SportsPulse: USA TODAY Sports Jeff Zillgitt breaks off Game 7 of the Eastern Conference finals, where LeBron James added another chapter to his legacy by guiding the Cavaliers past the Celtics in Boston.

Since LeBron James completed a virtuoso Eastern Conference playoff run, which is considered the most impressive in his career, there were three prevalent arguments for why that was not good is time to reconsider his position against Michael Jordan in the GOAT argument.

The first, of course, uses Jordan's 6-0 record in the NBA Finals as a conversation endorser over James, who is 3-5 and will play a pretty significant role this time underdoging the Golden State Warriors. People who fall into this camp will never be influenced, and therefore will not participate in the conversation, no matter what James does for the rest of his career.

The second group claims that James's place in history is not yet written His career is ongoing, and therefore we do not have the full perspective of his achievements, which is accurate but an excuse We've got the ability as humans to re-evaluate things in real time.

More NBA

And the third group just wants us to avoid the comparison with Jordan because, as they claim, we should just sit back and appreciate James for what he's doing in here And now is, somehow implicit A sporting argument is that we can not enjoy what he's doing in his 15th NBA season by hitting each other for the eighth time in a row.

I have only one answer to all these people: what are we going to talk about?

At a time when the same two teams will play in the NBA Finals for the fourth consecutive year, and the 2018-19 season will begin in five months. 25 of the league's 30 teams will be eliminated from the competition on Day 1. What could be more important? or relevant as the possibility that the GOAT discussion has shifted significantly?


Show thumbnails

Show captions

Dan Clouds on Twitter : @ Dan Clouds

Source link