Almond Ngan / AFP / Getty Images
A federal judge in Maryland investigates a case claiming that the Trump government intends to discriminate against skin color migrant communities by adding a citizenship issue to the 2020 census.
District Judge George Hazel ordered the proceeding to continue after Justice Department lawyers confirmed in a court case on Friday that they were still seeking ways to add the question, "Is this person a United States citizen?" – to the census. On Wednesday, President Trump pointed out that he wanted to find a way that was acceptable to the Supreme Court.
Last month, the Supreme Court voted to leave a lower court decision that dismissed the reason given by the Trump administration. In the majority opinion, Judge John Roberts said that the government's use of the Voting Act to justify the question "seems to have been invented".
Hazel's order means that the Trump administration is prolonging the legal fight to introduce citizenship If the census is questioned, one can find in court further evidence of how and why the government has tried to accept it.
The President was asked on Friday why he had left the White House for a weekend at his New Jersey golf club. "They need it for the Congress, for the classification," he told reporters. "They need it for remedies."
Census data sheds light on how $ 880 billion a year is spent on schools, roads and other public services. The constitutionally determined number of employees of each person in the US also determines how many congressional seats and votes have been allocated to each state for a decade.
However, the population used is the total number of residents, not just the US citizen
The government has pleaded to collect evidence for Maryland-based claims to be put on hold while the government continues to look for one new reason is looking to add the question. But Hazel ordered to start immediately with the discovery of the legal process in which both sides seek information and conduct interviews. Court documents show that officials of the Justice and Trade Departments have to meet under oath if the discovery process continues as planned.
"The remaining claims of the plaintiffs are based on the premise that the emergence of the citizenship issue was fraught with discriminatory motives," Hazel wrote in a letter in which he explained his command. "Notwithstanding the justification that the defendants now find for a & # 39; new & # 39; decision, the discovery will remain relevant in the context of the origins of the issue." Rights of race and language minorities. However, the plaintiffs argue that Trump's officials are trying to give the Republicans and non-Hispanic whites a political advantage when new constituencies are drawn into a citizenship question for the 2020 census.
"We have four or five ways to do this do, "Trump told reporters. "We are working on many things, including an enforcement order."
Opponents of the inclusion of the citizenship question in the census point out that an enforcement order can not replace a court decision.
to override a Supreme Court or other judicial decision or circumvent the Congressional process of determining the content of the census, "said Thomas Saenz, President and General Counsel of the Mexican-US Defense and Education Fund, which has some representing the groups that have sued the Trump administration for the issue
Meanwhile, the clock is ticking, with around 1.5 billion paper shipments to be printed for the 2020 census, including some 137 million questionnaires for mailboxes by mid-March Ministry of Justice and Department of Commerce officials overseeing the Census Bureau said earlier this week that the printing of paper forms without the citizenship question has already begun.
Trump suggested that officials print the question as an "addendum." . "Such an unusual step with the Frag However, the "once a decade" arc is not described in the Census Bureau's detailed operational plan for the 2020 Census.