قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Kavanaugh played against Union Drive in 2012 with Trump Casino

Kavanaugh played against Union Drive in 2012 with Trump Casino



Six years before President Donald Trump nominated him for the Supreme Court, Judge Brett Kavanaugh supported Trump Entertainment Resorts' successful efforts to prevent a union action in one of its casinos.

Kavanaugh was one of three Republican-appointed judges who unanimously voted unanimously in 2012 to lift an order from the National Labor Relations Board, which would have required the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino in Atlantic City, New Jersey, to sign up with the United Auto Workers to negotiate.

The casino has closed since then. But workers' representatives point out the case ̵

1; as well as cases in which he assisted management at Sheldon Adelson's Las Vegas and SeaWorld hotel after an orca killed a worker – as proof that Kavanaugh was enforcing labor laws and the already-contested ones [19559006] "Kavanaugh, along with Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch – and Roberts for the ride – will be covering the most radical, anti-employment Supreme Court in my lifetime," said Wyoming University Law Professor Michael Duff, a former NLRB attorney, headlined the names of current members of the Supreme Court

Kerri Kupec, a White House spokeswoman for Kavanaugh's confirmation test, said, "Judge Kavanaugh's 12-year record in employment cases reflects his reputation as a fairer and independent arbitrator of the law, based on text and precedent, so probably decided for both employers and employees alike.

By BLAW: Killer Whale, NFL Under the Supreme Court Security Candidates Ceses

The Atlantic City Casino controversy dates back to 2007 when the UAW hosted a media event with a group of supporting federal and state legislators Six days later, workers voted 324 to 149 to join the UAW

in 2012, the year of the appeals court's ruling Trump Plaza was owned by Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc., whose future president, according to investment firms, held 9.5 percent of Trump Plaza.

Trump Plaza called on the union to reject the election and said it was been corrupted by the press conference and other support actions by politicians I think the union council wanted them to organize. The Labor Code does not prohibit politicians from supporting or rejecting union campaigns, or unions announce that they have majority support. But under the NLRB precedent, behavior that makes the NLRB itself biased may be grounds for devaluing a choice.

Related: Trump's Deregulators from Kavanaugh Encouraged Pick for SCOTUS

An NLRB judge dismissed the company's arguments. So did a group of two NLRB members, including a Republican appointed by President George W. Bush. They wrote that regardless of whether anything was wrong at the UAW election campaign, given the lack of evidence that many employees knew about the event, as well as the UAW's large profit margin, the company did not provide the required proof to overthrow.

In 2010, after a group of three Democratic NLRB members ruled that the Trump Plaza violated federal law by refusing to negotiate with the UAW, the company brought its case before the DC-based federal appeals court of Kavanaugh has been a judge since 2006.

In allegations in 2012, a firm lawyer accused the UAW of making a "complicated joke" that could create a "drag-along effect" where workers do not vote against the union because they think it will win anyway.

Kavanaugh pushed back the demands from both sides, but addressed his most vehement comments to the NLRB attorney, saying that it was "common sense" to refuse to present these news to the press conference Rence would not be widespread, and this could be a reason to return the case to the Agency for review.

circumstantial evidence

"If we are skeptical, if we find the conclusion unfounded, that only a few people knew we should send it back, right?" He asked. Kavanaugh agreed with a colleague in the case that the NLRB had falsely "ignored the substantive evidence", dismissed the Trump Plaza verdict and ordered the agency to rethink the case.

The case remains open, although the Trump Plaza closed in 2014, according to the NLRB, which rejected further comments. The UAW declined to comment.

Former NLRB leader Wilma Liebman, one of the deputies thrown out of the Trump Plaza case, said it was frustrating that Kavanaugh and his colleagues were defeating the workers' union's victory over a pre-fight election stunt held by the local media had not been the actual choice of unionization.

"To thwart the results of this election through such theatricality, the objectives of the Labor Code are simply missed," Liebmann Board of Directors said in 2011 doing legal work for the UAW in a non-related matter.

Traditional Dependence

Kavanaugh, she said, does not seem inclined to grant traditional tribute to agencies such as the labor bureau. "He does not seem friendly to the NLRB," she said.

Steven Swirsky, a lawyer on the management side and former NLRB lawyer, said that the court's ruling in the Trump Plaza case set precedents over the importance of an unstressed voice. "If your goal is to protect the processes, it's important to protect them," he said.

In one case in 2015, Kavanaugh voted with the majority of the court against the NLRB in a dispute with Adelson's Hotel and wrote that management had a first-amendment right to petition the police to issue citations against union activists on its property

In a dissent from 2014, he argued that the labor protection agency had exceeded its legal authority to punish SeaWorld Florida LLC when a killer whale pulled a trainer by the hair in a basin where she was drowned.

Paternalism

"When should we, as a society, paternalistically decide that the participants in these sports and entertainment activities must be protected from themselves – that the risk of significant bodily injury is simply too great, even for eager and willing participants?" Kavanaugh wrote

With a 2: 1 vote, the court upheld OSHA's citation

Former NLRB member Marshall Babson, who now represents an employer as a lawyer, said Kavanaugh's skepticism about quasi-legislative action by agencies benefit both Liberals and Conservatives.

"To the extent that he has another voice to limit the authority's authority, perhaps it will make Congress wake up and do something of what they should do," Babson said.

– With the support of Greg Stohr and Shahien Nasiripour


Source link