قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Kavanaugh's tedious paper trail could slow down the confirmation process

Kavanaugh's tedious paper trail could slow down the confirmation process



President Trump's decision for the Supreme Court has given members of the congress a pile of material to help them judge the judge.

Judge Brett Kavanaugh responded to a questionnaire from the Senate Judiciary Committee, which examined his career as a lawyer and lawyer, His work in the executive, education, membership of society, and more.

110 pages, plus attachments, his response released on Saturday is an opening glimpse of a long paper trail that lawmakers will consider when deciding whether to confirm it. The appointment of the Supreme Court could shift the court to the right for the years to come.

But his many years in the judiciary and executive service is part of the problem of having him confirmed by the Senate.

Democrats call for the Conservatives to appeal judges long paper trail before they even start meeting with him, let alone cast their votes on a lifelong appointment that could shift the court to the right.

The documents extend far beyond the judge's nearly 300 judges

The Democrats demand access to paperwork from Kavanaugh's tenure as a staff secretary in the White House of George W. Bush, for election representation in the Year 2000 and Kenneth Starr's Special Advisory Center Probe by Bill Clinton. The result could be at least 1

million pages. The scavenger hunt has become a game of high-stakes political strategy. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell intends to confirm Kavanaugh for the start of the Supreme Court meeting on October 1, and to bolster a Republican election pick-up in November. But the democratic search for documents could complicate this timeline.

McConnell spent the closed-door GOP policy lunch this week, outlining the schedule, the senators said. Since Republicans have only a slender majority of 51 seats, they are under pressure from conservatives to confirm the candidate, who could overturn the court's decisions for an upcoming generation. He replaced retired Judge Anthony Kennedy, often referred to as the "swing voice".

"We've already started hearing from our Democratic colleagues that they want to see every paper cut Brett ever encountered, Kavanaugh's desk," Republican No. 2 Senator John Cornyn of Texas told reporters.

But the top Democrat in the Judiciary Committee, Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, said in light of the "disturbing events" this week: namely Mr. Trump's Helsinki summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin – it's all the more more important to thoroughly examine the candidate of the President.

"It is ultimately the Supreme Court that will have the last word on whether a sitting president is above the president's law," she said. "We – the Senate – and the American public need to know where Judge Kavanaugh stands … and that starts with access to Judge Kavanaugh's documents from his time in the White House and as a political official."

A particular problem in the documentary struggle is the years Yale-trained Kavanaugh spent at the White House as a staff secretary for Bush – a work that touches almost every note that makes it to the President's desk – as well as his work during the Clinton's trial and

Kavanaugh served in the White House office under Bush from 2001. He told lawmakers at a hearing in May 2006 for his current work that he provided advice on ethics and separation of power, the nomination of judges and laws dealing with torture reform, and a federal bailout to limit insurers' losses in the event of a terrorist attack.

Kavanaugh described the position of bar secretary as "an honest brok." For the president, "who sought to ensure that the president has received a range of political views on matters of the day in a balanced manner Democrats say his role as a politician is more substantial than this.

The Senate Judiciary Committee negotiates, How Much Information Is Used For The Validation Process The task is scary and involves a whole bundle of papers that have to be gathered from the National Archives, the Bush Library and others, and reviewed by lawyers' stables, and the talks are still in its infancy

Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, R-Iowa, said this was his 15th hearing before the Supreme Court, promising the "most transparent and thorough trial of all." [196592002] But he warned even delaying it. "I will not allow taxpayers for one of government-sponsored fishing expedition, "said Grassley.

He quoted the number of records reviewed in recent Supreme Court confirmations: 173,000 pages of documents for Elena Kagan's endorsement in 2010 and 182,000 pages for Neil Gorsuch's confirmation last year. The quote was undoubtedly draft and showed what the Senate considered appropriate in the past.

The Republicans say that withdrawing the trial could backfire against the Democrats if they push the votes too close to the midterm elections.

But Democrats appear ready to take that risk. They find that the more information about one of Trump's candidates in the district court, Ryan Bounds, became known, the less support he had. McConnell baffled senators this week as he withdrew limits out of respect.

___

Associated Press author Kevin Freking of Washington contributed to this report.


Source link