Following repeated allegations by President Trump that he had "no collusion" between his campaign and Russia, he was assisted by Special Adviser Robert Mueller, and the President on Friday requested the New York Times and the Washington Post to release the Pulitzer Losing prizes they had received for stories about the US
The President tweeted: "So funny that the New York Times and the Washington Post awarded a Pulitzer Prize for their coverage (1
A summary of Müller's findings published last Sunday by Attorney General William Barr said:" The Special Counsel's investigation did not reveal that the Trump campaign or anybody was involved in it conspired with or collaborated with Russia, to influence the US Presidential elections in 2016. "
MARC THIESSEN: THE TRUMP RUSSIA KALLUSION HALL
Many media report that the Trump campaign worked with Russia to house Trump in the Oval Office.
The Graduate School of Journalism at Columbia University presented the Washington Post and the New York Times last April with the Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting work on the history of Trump-Russia.
That same month, I saw how my former Columbia classmates were looking forward to Trump's impeachment. The occasion was an alumni podium discussion titled "A Year of Trumps: Lessons for the Press.
. However, this should be a moment of honesty and introspection for journalists – and a confession that they make mistakes and their prejudices influence their work.
The podium discussion in Columbia took place one day after the announcement of North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un that he would stop the nuclear and missile tests and close the site where the previous six nuclear tests of the North were conducted. Kim gave the announcement in response to a historic diplomatic initiative by President Trump.
Nobody knew what would happen next, but everyone should have realized – even someone who had never attended a single high school journalism class – that this was the case was a significant development and a big news ,
Dean Steve Coll, Journalism School, asked the alumni panelists – including the director of the New York Times Washington office, Elisabeth Bumiller, the Wall Street Journal investigative reporter, Michael Rothfeld, and the Washington-Washington reporter of Washington, Kimberly Herkins, the week's biggest news.
The group rated the top stories as a continued Mueller investigation, the legal problems of former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, and the long-standing allegations of adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who claimed she had a consensual one-night stand with Trump years. Trump denies having an affair with Daniels and denies any misconduct in payments she received to keep silent about her claim.
I looked around the Jamail lecture hall on the third floor to make sure I was in the right place. What happened next was appalling.
For about 90 minutes, Coll, the panelists, and the audience raved about speculation as to when Müller would release his report and how soon the House of Representatives could initiate impeachment proceedings against Trump. There was no claim to objectivity. There was only one room full of Anti-Trumpers who pursued each other with the imagination of the President's passing demise.
Most speakers had the clear assumption that President Trump had committed to his innocence. Most obviously believed that the collusion charge was correct.
Not once did anyone point out that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
For someone like me who never believed the Russian collusion story was hard to see. Even more insulting were the dismissive references to Trump supporters as "people who do not read East Coast newspapers" or "these people from the belly of the country".
This unintellectual crowd had turned the discussion into something that ought to have been The title of "Getting rid of Trump in every possible way."
And when the news of North Korea's diplomatic efforts that day did not come to the news topics of the Columbia Journalism School, I almost got up and went out.  This year's Alumni Lecture is called "Election Coverage 2020: how to avoid a repeat of 2016". In addition to Coll and Bumiller, Tom Namako of Buzzfeed and Morgan Radford of NBC will join the panel in April.
Let's hope there is a more intellectual and balanced discussion about how their bias has led them to miss the biggest story of the decade.
Do not look for the Columbia Journalism School to retire the Pulitzer Prizes that were awarded to The New York Times and Washington Post. That would be too much expected.
However, this should be a moment of honesty and introspection for journalists – and a confession that they make mistakes and their prejudices influence their work. They must admit that they have inaccurately reported on the 2016 elections and the fake Russia Collusion story. You must apologize to the American people for deceiving them.
CLICK HERE TO OBTAIN THE FOX NEWS APP
. The best scenario would be for Trump hate journalists to acknowledge their bias and deceit and to commit to fairer reporting.
However, I have my doubts. Many media appear to be focusing more on how to prevent President Trump from being re-elected in 2020.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE OF KRISTIN BIANCO