Congress is producing an unusual barrage of bills, resolutions and new sanctions proposals to supportrelations with NATO allies and prevent Russian interference in the interim election.
However, it remains uncertain if any of their efforts will yield results. Legislators are struggling with internal party unions and their own attacks on their proposals as they seek to go beyond a symbolic rebuke of Trump's interactions with the Russian president and exert influence at home and abroad. And while many Democrats are eager for quick votes, some Republicans do not favor them at all.
While Trump and Putinlegislators appear in both parties ̵
Still The past few weeks have been one of the few moments in the Trump era in which Republicans and Democrats have jointly championed the role of Congress as a counterweight to the government.
"You're watching Congressional action since then At the Helsinki Summit, you'll find Democrats and Republicans, who both stand up and say no," said Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., In an interview on C-SPAN with The Associated Press and the Washington Post.
For starters There is a bipartisan push by Senator John McCain, R-Ariz, Senator Tim Kaine, D-Va and others to "expressly ban" the President from NATO without the approval of the Senate.
Other senators are debating measures to prevent interference in the midterm elections. Senator Lindsey Graham, RS.C., and Senator Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., Call protection of the electoral system a "national security priority."
Graham said it was "extremely important that Congress acknowledge the threat our electoral system comes from Russia and acts decisively."
In addition, the legislation of McCain and Cardin would require the approval of Congress before Trump Sanctions May Reverse According to the Law of Sergei Magnitsky Prohibiting Travel Visas and Freezing Assets
Russia's resentment over the Magnitsky Act of 2012 played in what Trump originally called Putin's "unbelievable offer" at the summit Allow US poll of Russians accused by the Ministry of Justice to hack the Democrats emails. In turn, Putin asked for the investigation of Americans involved in the Magnitsky Act.
McCain called this a "perverse proposal," and Trump has withdrawn from it.
With some 100 days left before the midterm elections, some say The Congress is not acting fast enough.
A bill approved by McConnell is a legislation by Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., And Senator Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., Who tries to warn Putin of further interference by Hard new sanctions imposed on Russia when it tries to intervene.
The move is coming slowly through the Senate Banking Committee, but some legislators in the House of Representatives and Senate have voiced concerns overcrowding and could cause problems for Allied nations doing business with Russia.
Rubio says he is ready to adapt the legislation to address concerns, but the goal is that Russia understands that there will be a prize for further voting. He added that the legislation was only introduced months before the Helsinki Summit and should not embarrass or attack the president.
"I am very concerned about their ability to interfere with our policies," Rubio said in an interview. "We want them to know what the price will be to make that choice."
The legislation would probably see overwhelming support, say the legislators of both parties. But a vote is not planned.
Some symbolic measures against Russia did not manage to get out of the starting gate.
Already, the Senate has a symbolic resolution by Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., And blocks Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., To reaffirm the findings of American intelligence that Russia has intervened in the 2016 elections , Twice in the past two weeks, the Republicans objected to the move, preferring a more strategic approach that goes beyond symbolic resolutions.
Democrats of the House of Representatives were similarly thwarted by framing new sanctions on anyone who had interfered with US elections and strengthening the constituency security funds for the Republican states blocking these votes.
Major Republicans are swirling more federal spending on electoral security. Senate Appropriations Committee GOP Chairman Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby said Monday that he was worried that federal funds would come with "attached" strings intervening in election operations, believing it should be left to the states
The US learned "a lot about Russian interference." "I think we are much better prepared today than we were a few years ago."
But the spokesman added that Congress has more to do.