Abolition of the ICE!
That was the seemingly radical message that Chardo Richardson, a Florida House representative, published in an online statement four months ago, confirming a call for the abolition of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency
. Immigrants are some of the most courageous and hardworking people humanity has to offer, "he wrote in an introduction to the immigration platform of the Brand New Congress, an advanced grassroots organization." We can only benefit from their presence. "
Until that At first point, the idea was widespread in the social media, among the political candidates Mr. Richardson was a bit of a lonely voice, but in the months since then ̵
By Massachusetts to Hawaii, progressive candidates who face the immense obstacles not sure about was the elimination of a federal agency Twitter has peppered with hashtags of support. Deb Haaland, a Native American who stunned the political establishment of New Mexico earlier this month with a first victory in the house, supports the idea. A candidate from Florida, Matt Haggman completed a campaign advertisement promising "close ICE". Cynthia Nixon, who runs for governor in New York, called the immigration office a "terrorist organization."
"We should abolish ICE," Richardson said in an interview this week with the conviction of a politician who believes he's a profitable one Idea has. "ICE is terrorizing our communities."
Political strategists point to the inherent risk in the movement: that Republicans will use it to portray Democrats as extremists who are weak at border control. "The other side uses the slogan to convey to the country that this is a debate on open borders," said Cecilia Muñoz, former director of the White House Domestic Policy Council under President Obama.
Nonetheless, the idea gained momentum as a call of the extreme left, and Ms. Ocasio-Cortez annoyed victory over an establishment Democrat gave him a new political currency. Then, on Thursday night, just hours after hundreds of immigration protesters on Capitol Hill chanted "exterminate ICE", Kirsten Gillibrand became the first sitting senator to directly assist in the elimination of the agency.
"I think you should get rid of it, start over, reinvent, and build something that actually works," said Ms. Gillibrand, New York Democrat, on CNN. Later, she shared the news on Twitter.
It was a strong gesture that came from a prominent Democrat who is also considered a potential presidential candidate in 2020 and who could inspire more high-profile politicians to support the idea. (Mayor Bill de Blasio of New York City added his support on Friday morning.) Remarkably, Senator Gillibrand had supported Ms. Ocasio-Cortez's opponent, Democratic man Joseph Crowley, in the primary.
The call to abolish the ICE remains largely rhetorical, activist position with questionable feasibility. Top leaders of the Democrats have not taken the position, and only a handful of other politicians who have stayed there have accepted it so far.
But the persistent dislike of the crisis at the border makes the move to abolish the ICE an important political issue for the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Driven by their ideology as any concrete political calculus, a small but increasing number of progressive candidates are pushing for the proposal.
Some Democrats refer to other progressive proposals that were once similarly dismissed by party leaders, but have since entered the mainstream Democrats, such as Medicare for all and tuition-free public college. The hope among grassroots activists is that progressive energy will give these people political cover to accept an abolitionist ICE policy that thrived on the sidelines.
"ICE operates through tactics of fear, violence and intimidation, with questionable legality and tears separating families," said Stephanie Taylor, a founder of the Liberal Progressive Change Campaign Committee, in a statement. "We applaud the growing number of progressives calling for an end to this terror."
Your ICE proposal, this Progressive Hope, could also help encourage voters in the summer primary and parliamentary elections in November. Some of those who support the position said in interviews that they were particularly encouraged by the victory of Mrs. Ocasio-Cortez.
But as the movement gains in strength, it has also attracted attention from the right, which has helped it claw The Democrats
In a Wednesday interview with Politico, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, called Democratic Party as "self-proclaimed socialists" who wanted "open borders".
Kellyanne Conway, The White House Advisor has also tried to use the Progressive Rally Against Democrats.
"Any Democratic candidate could now be asked, perhaps," Do you agree with the Democratic Party's new face that we should abolish immigration and customs and enforcement? "Ms. Conway said Wednesday in Fox News.
However, there are indications that the proposal resonates in the halls of Washington. This week, Wisconsin MP Mark Pocan said he plans to introduce a law to abolish immigration. In an interview, he said he had received support from other members of the Democratic House, such as Pramila Jayapal of Washington, Earl Blumenauer of Oregon, and Jim McGovern of Massachusetts.
"I think you will find more support for this because it really starts addressing the core abuses by the administration," Mr. Pocan said.
There is little agreement on whether Americans support the complete closure of ICE operations, but recent data shows that President Trump's nativist push is pushing both legal and illegal immigration contradicts public opinion. A Pew Research Center poll published Wednesday said that about 70 percent of Americans want legal immigration to remain at least at current levels, but more Americans support their increase than their decline. A survey of American voters at Quinnipiac University found that 50 percent of Americans think the Trump administration was too aggressive in the deportations.
One potential problem is that the abolition of the ICE could further divide the Democratic Party. The message goes to the center and beyond into the presidential campaign 2020. The elimination of a federal agency is a position that leaves little room for compromise, and moderate Democrats who do not support the proposal are risking the wrath of the far-right extremist extreme that the party establishment already considers slow to accept their ideals.
Strategists and legal experts believe that this position could be difficult, especially if it continues to be a party political issue.
"We need to think about immigration policy from a very different perspective, but I think it's possible," said Sameera Hafiz, a senior political strategist at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center.
Proponents of the abolition of ICE are loud, their reputation German: emagazine.credit-suisse.com/app/art … = 263 & lang = DE It was reinforced by social media, but they offered few concrete plans, and Mr Wisconsin 's Mr Pocan said that his bill would create a commission that would examine ICE to determine which of its roles should be executed by other agencies ] At this point, however, the problem is still largely the far-left province, and even progressives disagree on the opt-out proposal.
"I do not know if the abolition of ICE will solve anything," Veronica Escobar said. a Progressive candidate for Congress in the 16th district of Texas on the Mexican border. "The fact is that ICE do some things necessary to keep the land safe. "
Wife. In particular, Escobar mentioned ICE's work on child rape and trafficking, a point she repeated in a long Facebook post.
The barriers to the removal of ICE do not deter groups such as Brand New Congress from abolishing the agency in its November 2017 immigration platform and encouraged young social activists such as Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and Mr. Richardson of Florida to run for the Federal Office ,
The group's educational material cites the enormous fiscal burden of immigration enforcement and also claims that other government agencies can carry out surveillance work on immigration enforcement with clearer oversight
. Ocasio-Cortez & # 39; victory has only spurred efforts.
"As long as Progressives continue to win elections and push the issue further and refuse to let go of the issue of abolishing ICE, it will be a bigger problem for the Democrats," said Sarah Smith, who runs for Congress in Washington. "This is just another problem where we need to get them to listen to us."