قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Entertainment / Logan, Veronica and the crowdsourcing problem: NPR

Logan, Veronica and the crowdsourcing problem: NPR



Jason Dohring and Kristen Bell as Logan and Veronica in the new season of Veronica Mars on Hulu.

Hulu


Hide caption

Caption switch

Hulu

Jason Dohring and Kristen Bell as Logan and Veronica in the new season of Veronica Mars on Hulu.

Hulu

[SpoilerWarning:Containsinformationonthenewseasonof Veronica Mars which fell on Friday. Do not say that you have not been warned.]

I confess at the beginning that I was skeptical of the film by Veronica Mars which was crowdfunded by fans. I wrote then: "The film feels more commemorative than creative – it's more of a gift than an extension or even an extension of history on a shelf."

Creator Rob Thomas agrees, or so he suggests in an interview with critic Alan Sepinwall published today:

The film was purposely nostalgic and fan-service. It was a fan-funded movie. It was like making a list of all the things we thought the fans wanted to see and trying to create a mysterious storyline that would get us to those desserts.

In other words, as Thomas goes on. More specifically, the project began with the collectively understood wish list of the fans, and the story was rebuilt to fulfill those desires. That's probably why the changes in Veronica's once-evil friend Logan felt so unnatural – not because it seemed impossible that he could have grown, but because it felt like he had been ground to the point where he, as I said then, would become a cartoon prince. (His only remaining fault was – and I'm sorry I can not let that go – that his Navy whites did not fit, making him look like he was wearing someone else's clothes, I can not let go!) The fans paid for a fantasy, and that's a nice idea, and they got it, and they loved it, and that's a good thing.

[Do not say you were not warned of spoilers more than once.]

But of course, this crowd-sourced campaign ultimately killed Logan.

Of course, I exaggerate. But what Thomas explains in the interview with Rolling Stone is that he did not think it credible that Logan would suddenly be the dark figure he was during the regular show. Not after such a revision in the movie. Thomas wants to write real Noir, he says, and with a nice, stable relationship in the center you can not write a real Noir. Once this relationship became the imagination of the people who wanted to see Logan and Veronica, it could not be assumed that the relationship would continue until the show ended. It is less that nothing can remain gold; it is more than nothing Gold is Noir, which makes sense both in the language of television and in the language of French.

This is a problem essential to the invention. One must remain unfulfilled until the end . It's alright to have a happy, completed graduation at the end of a story, but you can not have one in the middle of a story. By giving the fans the happy ending they wanted, Thomas forced them to work only as the end of the story. But he did not really want it to be the end of the story.

That's why Logan had to die. A living cartoon prince is not in the series that Thomas wants to do, but the trauma of losing your cartoon prince does it. Excellent pieces about the new season of Caroline Framke and Libby Hill, among others, wrestled with the strange way that the show begins to address Veronica's unhealthy appeal to Logan just to seemingly drop her off and make the couple dream again to treat. There is a promising sequence in which Veronica makes it clear that she is attracted to the same ugly behaviors that Logan tries to stop in therapy, but she is not pursued. It's frustrating to see the season, and sometimes it's a kind of lumpy and graceful arc. But it all makes some sense to realize that the story of Logan and Veronica this season is almost exclusively aimed at getting Thomas out of the hole he dug by giving the Logan / Veronica people that, what they wanted in the movie.

While reactions are still coming to a head, crowdfunding also runs the risk of contributors believing that they have become eligible investors. How do you feel today when you contributed to a movie because you wanted to see Logan and Veronica together and now you saw him die? In another show with intense fan preferences – Jane The Virgin for example, where there are people who are extremely Team Michael, and people who are extremely Team Rafael – you might find people who did not, to get a certain disgust what they wanted. But people who do not get what they thought they paid for do not convey the sense of betrayal in the consumption style.

If the film had not been crowdfunded or if Thomas Crowdfunding had not interpreted him as conducting a Wish List project, Logan might have remained a more complicated, elusive, sincerely bad idea in the long run on Veronica refers. And that would have been perfect for a longer noir story of a woman who could not free herself from ghosts. In other words, if he had not become so perfect, maybe he would still be alive today. (So ​​mean, talk about unhealthy, I know.)

Nobody who has funded the movie with crowdfunding is really responsible for it – it is a perfectly understandable impulse to raise one's own money Make way for creators to continue a project. Who could be against such luck, especially in this economy?

But as we move forward in this new environment and more projects are funded in this way, it is important for fans and creators to think beyond the fulfillment of desires and into the future. There are unintended consequences if you turn the creator / viewer pact upside down, what you want and what you do not want. You mess with it, and you may accidentally … you know, blow it up.


Source link