The defense team has held talks with prosecutors to solve a second series of charges against the former Trump campaign chairman before being convicted last week, but they have not reached a deal, and the two sides are now approaching a second trial next month , According to information from people who are familiar with the matter.
The plea hearings occurred when a Virginia jury spent four days balancing tax and bank fraud ads against Mr Manafort, the people said. This jury sentenced him in eight cases and arrested on ten others. The prosecutors accused Mr. Manafort of avoiding more than $ 16 million in taxes he had earned in the early 2010s through political consultations in Ukraine.
The plea speaks about the second indictment, by special advisor Robert Mueller, one of the people said. It is not clear what the questions were, and the proposed conditions of the pretext could not be determined immediately.
Representatives of Messrs Manafort and Mueller refused to comment.
The talks served to prevent a second, related trial for Mr. Manafort, scheduled to begin September 1
Prosecutors and defense lawyers have argued about how this case is to be described to the jury and what evidence can be presented at the trial. They will discuss these issues on Tuesday morning in front of US District Judge Amy Berman Jackson. Manafort was confronted with two alleged allegations in neighboring districts in two neighboring trials for refusing to bring the prosecutors together. From a defense policy perspective, such a move can force prosecutors to wage battles and share resources.
Discussions over the Washington case weaken Mr. Manafort's stance on Mr. Mueller's charges
Three other former Trump election aides, including former Manafort business partner Richard Gates, pleaded guilty to investigators and to lie to other crimes that were not at the core of Mr Müller's mandate to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 elections. Twenty-five Russians were also charged with hacking and other crimes. Moscow denies election blunders
The indictment in Virginia accuses Manafort of filing false tax returns between 2010 and 2014 and forcing several US banks to receive millions of dollars in loans in 2016 after its Ukrainian income was reportedly dried up  The prosecution has stated that the charge of tax fraud against Mr Manafort could result in a prison sentence of eight to ten years, but some other tax rates have dropped significantly.
US District Judge T.S. Ellis, who overseen the case of Mr. Manafort in Virginia, sentenced a retired professor of business school to seven months last year, after pleading guilty to hiding $ 220 million in foreign accounts and $ 18 million in federal and state funds Not to pay state taxes.
Unlike Mr. Manafort, the defendant had previously paid a $ 100 million fine to the US Treasury and co-authored the investigation.
Following the conviction of Mr. Manafort in Virginia last week, a juror said the vote on the other 10 points was 11: 1 in favor of a conviction. The jury, a self-proclaimed Trump supporter, told Fox News that the evidence was "overwhelming" and that the other jurors had tried to convince the lone holdout to change their voice.
Prosecutors have until Wednesday to report whether they intend to re-investigate Mr. Manafort over the arrested counts. At the moment, both sides seem to be preparing for the Washington Process.
In this case, the prosecutors accuse Mr. Manafort of not having registered in the US for his lobbying work for the Ukrainian government between 2008 and 2014 and plotting to shed millions of dollars in revenue from this work in order to avoid it US authorities hide.
In June, the prosecutors added charges that accused Mr. Manafort of trying to influence the testimonies of potential witnesses. This prompted Judge Jackson to send Mr. Manafort to prison while awaiting trial.
In a late-night filing, the prosecutor said she expected 10 to 12 days to present her case. Last week, they presented more than 1,500 exhibits they wanted to present to Mr. Manafort's team.
Mr. The lawyers at Manafort said they were not sure if they would defend themselves, but if they did, it could take three or four days. They said they were looking for experts who could testify on money laundering and foreign lobbying rules.
Write to Aruna Viswanatha in Aruna.Viswanatha@wsj.com