The federal judge, who oversaw the Paul Manafort trial, admitted one Thursday morning that he had made a mistake the day before to prosecute the prosecutors of Robert Mueller before the jury.
Appealing to the jury before the prosecutor's office called their first witness of the day, US District Judge TS Ellis said "was wrong on Wednesday when he struck the miller." Some witnesses testified that an expert witness from the IRS Courtroom should remain while other witnesses testified.
Typically, witnesses should not hear another's testimony in a trial, so they have no control over each other, but Mueller's team got Ellis' permission during the court's opening remarks last week to regularly bring the IRS agent to justice.
"This robe does not make me any different from human," said Ellis court on Thursday morning after telling the jury to forget what he was doing Mueller's team had said about the IRS witness. "You have to set this aside."
Mueller's team was frustrated by repeated ears Ellis during the Manafort trial – now on his eighth day. Before the court began on Thursday morning, they filed a written petition to formally protest how they had been called out over the witness testimony.
The Mueller team asked Ellis to explain to the jury that the prosecution had done nothing wrong from the first week of last week's hearing, which showed that prosecutor Uzo Asonye specifically requested that witnesses be excluded "with the exception of our expert and our [FBI] clerk. " The judge and prosecutor went on to discuss Michael Welch's name and expertise. And the judge unequivocally confirmed the exception.
"The court falsely accused the government of having allowed IRS treasury official Michael Welch, the government's expert, to stay in the courtroom during the trial, even though he was in fact on the first day of the trial explicitly approved, "the prosecutor's office complained in its application. "The court's condemnation of the government representative falsely suggested to the jury that the government had acted unlawfully and violated the court's rules, and that prejudice should be cured."
Ellis bred Asonye on Wednesday shortly after calling Welch to the stand. "It's my clear memory … that I did not allow experts," Ellis said. They will continue now, I will allow that, but I want you to remember it.
Asonye replied that the prosecutors "would review the protocol", but that was their belief that they had explicitly asked for permission to allow experts like Welch to stay in the courtroom despite the usual ban  "Well, let me clarify: I do not care what the transcript says," Ellis snapped, "maybe I made a mistake. But I want you to remember that, do not do that again. When I exclude witnesses, I mean everyone. Now it may be that I did not make that clear. "
The Judge's Sound He suspected that he was disturbed by the prosecutor's actions, though he eventually declared," It's no big deal. "
In their letter, Muller's team said the judge's act had left a "negative impression" on them. "The judge's sharp reference to the jury on August 8 was wrong. And while mistakes are a natural part of the process, the mistake here has affected the government, "wrote the team around Ellis. He told the jury he was wrong, and the prosecutor's office did not do anything wrong.
Before the jury on Thursday But after the session began, Asonye asked Ellis to deal with the issue, and the judge snapped, "All right, I'll take care of it."
The judge's strike against the Wednesday charge for testimony was just the last of a whole series of allegations he had recently put into Mueller's cadres, ranging from topics ranging from body language to exaggerated informality, to efforts to introduce visual images of Manafort's lavish lifestyle Exchange has clearly begun to focus on the prosecution, which has sometimes verbally protested in court, but before Thursday k filed a formal appeal.
On Wednesday, Ellis abused prosecutor Greg Andres for responding to questions from the court in terms the judge considered too casual, such as "yeah" or "yup."
"Be careful," he said to Andres. "This is not an informal procedure."
Andres relapsed a moment later, offering a "Yup" in response to another judge's question.
"Excuse me?" Ellison voiced his annoyance.
"Yes, Judge," answered Andres.
Ellis sometimes accused defenders, but that was rarer. On the other hand, the prosecution has done most of the hard work as long as the government is making its case, and the defense has the opportunity to call witnesses expected next week.
Muller Team Returns to Bank Fraud
The prosecutors returned to the bank fraud attacks against Manafort on Thursday morning and requested a mortgage assistant to file his 2015-16 application for a loan in a condominium Manhattan settled with his wife and one of his daughters.
Melinda James, an assistant to the Citizens Bank, testified that Manafort signed documents designating the Howard Street apartment as a second home for her daughter Jessica and her then-husband Jeffrey Yohai. Manafort also stated that he had no other mortgages on a wide swath of real estate.
But Mueller's team noted down documents that showed that Manafort had submitted tax returns to the property in New York's SoHo district for 365 days a year listed on Airbnb. The prosecutors also presented insurance and financial documents that represented debt that Manafort had on his other properties.
In her testimony, James said that while she was reviewing the Streeteasy website, she discovered that the property could be rented, although Manafort billed it as a home for his family. She explained that the bank and the credit insurers had made other calculations if they believed that Manafort had rented the apartment or had other mortgages on his property. English: www.mjfriendship.de/en/index.php?op…39&Itemid=32 1 Bogeyman, star prosecutor and former Advisor to Manafort Rick Gates Defender Jay Nanavati noted that Citizens Bank's loan had gone through a "months-long claim process" and that the person sending the bank insurance documents indicating that there were no other outstanding loans was Gates.
Gates also called the bank to ease doubts about a loan that the bank has expelled as a potential barrier to the ownership of Howard Street, James testified. He told the bank that they would not get ahead with this loan.
"Things did not work until you were called by Mr. Gates later that day, right?" Nanavati asked
"I think – if you pull it off the rails," James said.
Nanavati also noted that, even if Manafort's 2015 and 2016 Howard Street tax returns as a leased property for the entirety of In these two years, these returns would only have been filed following the filing and approval of Howard Street mortgage application Manafort.
However, Asonye pointed out that Manafort was copied to an e-mail where Gates allegedly misleading information put forward "no mortgagee" on Manafort's other properties. The prosecutor also said it was bizarre to think that Gates was unilaterally trying to outsmart the bank.
"As far as you know, Mr. Gates has received refinancing from this payout?" Asked Asonye.
"No," James replied.
"Who has the money?" Assonee asked
"Mr. Manafort," James said.
Airbnb "ing Manafort's Condo
The prosecutors also named senior Airbnb manager Darin Evenson to testify that between January 2015 and April 2016, the Howard Street home was located on the popular site called "Amazing Full Floor Loft in Soho".
However, there were a few breaks in its availability, Evenson said. One of them was the apartment that came from the apartment on February 26, 2016, a few days before the mortgage. The apartment came back to the square a month later, the Airbnb official said.
Evenson, a retired Navy Seal, acknowledged that the company had no indication that Manafort itself was ever considered a "host" on the platform. Instead, Manafort's son-in-law, Yohai, was named as the contact.
Manafort and his wife Kathleen finally closed the $ 3.4 million loan on March 4, 2016 – less than four weeks before he was named Trump Convention Manager of the Republican National Convention campaign.