Taxi driver and The late director Martin Scorsese lit the flames of outrage in October. The Oscar-winning filmmaker voiced his less positive opinion of Marvel Studios' films when he spun for his new film for Netflix The Irishman .
He told Empire Magazine that Marvel films are "not a movie theater". This sparked fury among fans of films like The Avengers, Black Panther and Captain America .
psychological experiences for another person, "said the director. Martin Scorsese ” class=”wp-image-1351231″/>
Scorsese has now written an opinion article published in the New York Times that explains his thought process behind these biting words. The article, published on November 4, was titled "Martin Scorsese: I said," Wonder movies are not a movie. " Let me explain it.
Martin Scorsese does not want to live in the Marvel Cinematic Universe
Scorsese wrote in the NYT work that he was trying to watch the Marvel films. But he said, "They are not for me." The famous director claimed that the action films are "closer to theme parks than films I've known and loved all my life." I can not identify her as a cinema.
But Scorsese claimed that Marvel fans used this special label – "no cinema" – as their "proof of hatred on Marvel." He argued that this was not the case.
"People with considerable talent and craftsmanship," he wrote, make these films. "The fact that I'm not interested in the films themselves is a matter of personal taste and temperament.
The Irish director has not grown up with a love for superhero films.
Scorsese suspected he might see it differently if he had grown up in the era of Marvel franchise success.
"But I grew up then and developed a flair for films – for what they were and what they could be," he wrote. When he was an aspiring filmmaker, Scorsese explained, films had a different overall purpose than they do today.
"Cinema was about revelation – aesthetic, emotional and spiritual revelation," wrote Scorsese. "It was about characters – the complexity of people and their contradictory and sometimes paradoxical natures."
Scorsese compared Alfred Hitchcock in a surprising way with the Marvel films.
Alfred Hitchcock Vs. Marvel Studios
"I suppose you could say that Hitchcock was his own franchise," he wrote. "Every new Hitchcock image was an event." As an example, he used Hitchcock's icon rear window [
"It was an event created by the chemistry between audience and image itself, and it was electrifying," Scorsese recalled to the Marvel films as "theme parks." But like Scorsese in New York Even Alfred Hitchcock films – traditionally regarded as high art – could take you.
"Certain Hitchcock films were also theme parks," wrote the director of The Wolf of Wall Street. He described the legendary horror film Psycho as "an experience I'll never forget". The audience was "surprised and enthusiastic, and they were not disappointed."
Scorsese still prefers older thrillers to today's blockbusters. They contained an emotional depth that he believes is missing from Marvel.
Yes, Hitchcock used set pieces and twists. But he argued that these films would be "nothing more than a sequence of dynamic and elegant compositions and cuts without the painful emotions at the center of the story."
Scorses recognizes the impressive technical and artistic aspects of many Marvel films. But it's what's missing, what's striking.
"What does not exist is revelation, mystery or real emotional danger," he wrote about the box office hits. "Nothing is endangered."
The directors of comic-based films can not be authors, says Scorsese.
Honestly, Scorsese's updated statement could be even sharper than his original comments. The sequels of the franchise he called "Remakes in Spirit". He lamented the fact that "everything in them is officially sanctioned because it can not really be otherwise".
For these large studio films, executives conduct market research and test the audience over and over again. That way, they know that the end product will reach as many eyeballs as possible. But it inevitably curbs the artistic risk a filmmaker can take.
According to Scorsese, Marvel Studios' films lack "something essential to cinema: the unified vision of a single artist" is "the riskiest factor of all".
Marvel's takeover at the box office rules out independent film
For Scorsese, however, it's not just about his personal taste or the strict limits of creativity. It's about smaller, independent films that need a chance to fight.
"It's a dangerous time in the movie show," he worried. "There are fewer independent theaters than ever before."
Most filmmakers want their films to be in theaters. But, as Scorsese wrote, franchise films crowd "in most multiplexes on the screens." He sees no bright future for young and critical filmmakers.
"For anyone who dreams of making films, the situation is brutal at the moment and inhospitable to the arts," wrote Scorsese.
Well, the opinion has been clarified .