قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Entertainment / "Mission: Impossible" – Tom Cruise was pushed for a dark plot

"Mission: Impossible" – Tom Cruise was pushed for a dark plot



[ThisStoryContainsSpoilsfor Mission: Impossible – Fallout ]

With Mission: Impossible – Fallout author and director Christopher McQuarrie completed a mission he reluctantly accepted

After Cruise 2015 Mission: Impossible Rogue Nation reached 682 million US dollars worldwide, Tom Cruise persuaded McQuarrie to become the first director to succeed with Fallout . McQuarrie, who has worked with Cruise on nine films over the past twelve years, has not made this decision lightly and the terms have been agreed to create the feeling that a new director has replaced him. The experiment worked, and Fallout reached the franchise's biggest opening weekend with $ 61

.5 million and a glowing 98 percent Rotten Tomatoes score.

McQuarrie and Cruise started a script Fallout that was only 33 pages long, a move that allowed the team to be flexible and find the movie on the way. This flexibility also allowed them to follow paths that were both intriguing and ultimately inappropriate for the film.

A typical example: McQuarrie and Cruise have conceived an act in which hero Ethan Hunt would have adopted the identity of extremist John Lark for an even longer part of the film, a move that would have led the IMF agent into dark streets Pursuing his target and forcing him to do some "horrible things," McQuarrie notes. The extended plot was eventually scrapped as the director considered the film too intellectual and robbed him of the trademarks of Mission: Impossible .

The director also filmed a scene in which Hunt and Rebecca Ferguson's Ilsa shares a kiss, a moment he has cut out of the film for intricate reasons, which McQuarrie explains in an extensive spoiler-talk. Read it below.

From your perspective, what are the keys to Fallout is the most emotional mission: Impossible entry yet?

In previous films, There is a tendency to project on Ethan Hunt. People speculate about what Ethan thinks. We do not know it. As a result, Ethan is a kind of cipher. From the beginning, I was determined to push the audience into Ethan's mind and express his deepest fears. This brought the audience to a place where they are emotionally more connected to it, because they knew more about Ethan than the people around it. That was the key number one. The second part took the Ethan-Julia story and brought it to a more crystalline resolution than the one we delivered in Ghost Protocol. Tom and I thought that Ghost Protocol was a closure for this story. But because it was so ambiguous, it was not enough for many people. Wherever Tom went, he was asked if he was asked about it. So I knew that I had really good emotional material to deal with as soon as Tom sought closure for this story.

During Rogue Nation press, she mentions how you have an idea for his follow-up during production. Apparently, Tom was immediately excited by the idea. Was this the nightmare scene?

At Rogue I went in to tell Tom the idea for the next movie, and I said, "Hey, I have this great idea." He immediately turned around and said, "Oh, you mean I have to get Solomon Lane (Sean Harris) out of jail in the next movie because I need him for the mission?" He and I thought exactly the same lines and we were already thinking about what the next movie was. I do not suspect anything about which project, if any, Tom and I will do next. So, when I tell Tom that, I do not enforce my claim; I have no pride in authorship. That's an idea for Tom to go or go. I am not worth my ideas. If you're worth anything, you'll have more [ Laughs ]. It really was not until the movie was done that Tom said he wanted me to do that [ Fallout ]. And I hated to do it for several reasons, not least that I had just done one; It was very hard. The A400 stunt was a really complicated trick, and I could not imagine what was left after five mission movies. I just did not know what else Tom could do, and I could not imagine developing a sequence that was big enough. The other reason that worried me was that I knew that fans of the franchise had always expected a different director. And when I told Tom that this was a precedent, he said, "The precedents must be broken, I want you to direct the film." So I said I would do it, but I'll come back, on condition that I'm a different director because I wanted it to be a whole different movie. That was when we first talked about it being a more emotional movie – a little less fun and a little less than Ghost Protocol and Rogue Nation. It has also been argued that it is darker, more emotional, and more about Ethan than a character. It was very calculated, because it was not the kind of movie I had just delivered, and it would go a long way to giving the impression of another filmmaker.

You also mentioned during Rogue press that you have many leftover ideas for Tom and the next filmmaker (who eventually became you). Could you include some of these ideas?

Almost all of them. In fact, the stuff that did not make it into the movie was not an action stuff. Tom and I had talked for a long time about a HALO jump; We had talked about a helicopter sequence for a long time. I knew early on that we would make this motorcade with Lane, which then turned into the Parisian hunt. So, these things were already there. The stuff that did not make it into the movie, and there are remnants of it in the movie … when they go to the bathroom, the whole idea was to accept the identity of John Lark. Ethan has to accept Lark's identity without the mask. That was the plot of the whole movie: Ethan assumes the villain's identity, but looks like himself. And he must continue to convince people that he is the villain who forces Ethan to do darker and more terrible things to reach his destination, from which the first lane burned out of jail. That would eventually lead Ethan to a very dark path that Tom really embraced and that I followed for a long time. But as I clung to that idea, I realized that the movie was not moving forward. It was more about this idea and much more intellectual. It happened at the expense of all the other characters, and the film just got very long before it returned to the things that were committed in a Mission: Impossible . So I let it go, and as soon as I let it go, the whole England segment of the movie came together.

Was there ever a point where Ethan made the hard choice and actually killed? an innocent as "John Lark" to keep his cover?

I'll hold back a detailed answer to that, because the lesson I've learned is that everything we throw out comes back. For example, if Lane says to Ethan, "You should choose your mission to accept it … have you ever decided to do it, have not …?" – That was a scene we cut out of Rogue Nation. There was a confrontation between them earlier in the movie and for many reasons we had to take them out. In the end, I was thankful that we did it because it was in the wrong place. And then in Fallout came back to work. I'll say that I wrote a scene that brought Ethan to a very dark place, and when I presented it to Tom, he said, "Well, what about it?" Tom took the scene even darker and I was quite surprised. I said, "Do you really want to go there with Ethan?" Tom replied, "If we decide, let's do that." So it taught me something about the limitations of this character and the limits of this franchise are even more limitless than I thought.

Created the idea for the "Wolf Blitzkrieg" scene from Solomon Lanes Glaskiste in Rogue ?

Actually no. We call such scenes "mousetrap". And in the early stages of Rogue Nation we had wanted to open the movie with a mousetrap. We never really got it to work, and we really had a problem with it, because many creative people were involved and many rules prevailed in this scene. We tried to be smart, and the scene always collapsed under its own weight. But this idea came together in Fallout simply because I wanted the audience to know for a minute what it would be like if the villain actually did win, because you never feel that in those movies. All these films, even Bond films, the doomsday scenarios never play out. And rightly so; The movie can not be restored. But I wanted to make the beginning of the movie about Ethan's worst nightmares. I wanted the audience to experience them and take them off hook before the film starts. That was my way of giving you a taste of what might happen. It's not like Dr. Delbruuk fooled (Kristoffer Joner). Whether you find out or not, that something is going on, that's not what I'm looking for in the scene. What I'm looking for in the scene is in the first one and a half minutes of the scene where you think, "Oh my gosh, that really happened … Ethan really failed," you're faced with this horror. You can feel what it would be like if Ethan messes up. That should put you in his shoes in these one and a half minutes.

You've talked a lot about how Rogue Nation taught you that you can not control a Mission: Impossible movie. The more you try, the more it gets in your way. They were also open to a 33-page script to start production. Probably a finished script dominates the movie more than anything else, so I'm curious to hear a bit more about this approach, and is that something you'll use in other movies / genres – or is it just for Mission ?

It's an approach that I'll refer to rather than use. Something I've said many times about writing: There are no rules until you write them. You start with a clean page, and you quickly convince yourself that I can not do that because that happened or I can not do that because I want that . What Mission taught me is just letting everything go. What has to happen? What has to happen next? What is the most compelling thing that can happen next? As you just said, the finished script rules. In mission, the finished script is not. The finished script limits and limits actually. By discovering all I really need to know is where is the location and what assets must be on that day including vehicles, props, sets and actors. Everything that happens in this scene is malleable and can change as long as it matches what was shot. It does not have to correspond to what was not shot. What was not shot is completely malleable. So if we make a discovery that day, we can change it, but of course we can change it so much. If you have already shot the scene that comes before, you must honor it. What Tom and I did is we've developed a pretty solid set of muscles in terms of how to shoot a scene so that the scene can be manipulated so it can be quickly re-shot. For example, all information in a mission: Impossible movie – whenever possible – is in a car, phone box, or limited set of some sort, so we can go back and reload the stuff. We can change it when we really need it. And all the characters we find these characters in when we record them, we cover the scene so that I can pick out whole parts of the scene when they are no longer in the movie. That's how we can explore. The biggest and most important thing in this movie was in the early stages, locations. I did not really care what happened in those places. I just wanted the locations to look like a good-looking spy movie.

By this time, Rogue Nation looks like a summer movie. There are some colder scenes in the movie, but the Morocco segment of the movie, as well as the underwater sequence, produce a warm feeling that you have now differentiated over Fallout . Did you intend to make a colder climate movie – in contrast Rogue – or did the locations of the stunts / sequences decide that for you?

Without question it was the locations. I actually wanted to make a warmer film [ Laughs ]. Of course we landed in New Zealand during the winter. What I loved was that we were in Paris in the spring and we should be in London in the summer. And then Tom broke his ankle. So, the whole hunt, which was shot in January, should have been shot in August. All this is appropriate. The only scene I wanted to be cold in was the scene in which Ethan wakes up in the opening of the movie. I said [Cinematographer] Rob Hardy that I wanted to make the room look cold, and of course it is of course that the scene looks blue. Hardy is a contrarian by nature, and he does not like the tropics at all. He is not one of the people behind the wheel just because the bike is round. He said that he saw this before and did not want to. He said, "It will look cold, but the light will be warm …", which I thought was a rather strange statement. When we shot the scene, the room did not look cold. The room looks, if anything, almost candle-lit. Of course, the place we were in was an abandoned building, so it was pretty cold. Tom, who was lying on the bed, was very cold and we brought red radiant heater. Just before we went to the turning, I let the crew leave the radiant heaters in the recording. And the radiant heater, even if it's bright red, tells you that the room is cold. The added benefit is that Tom wakes up from this nightmare in that weird red light. Well, when we went to Milford Sound to shoot the wedding, we had to shoot the whole scene in an hour and have a certain day to go. Usually the weather is nice, but it is also winter in New Zealand. It was sunny all day long; it was really beautiful. And when we got there, the clouds had rolled in and it was very cold. It gave this opening scene that dull feeling. Of course you can see the breaths of all the characters, and we resisted that first. But then I realized that this is a nightmare. There is something wrong right out of the opening frame, even if you do not quite know what it is. Well, we accepted it. And I think that's what you feel. All of these were circumstances. It was not an attempt to make it look cold. Tom and I are always looking for warm color palettes because we know that we want to sell this movie as a summer movie.

Apart from Ilsa Shadowing Ethan, my favorite scene expanded on a device you launched in Rogue . When a plan is set up, Ethan and his team would imagine (rather than explain) the worst scenario in the plan. When the Solomon Lane Extraction Plan was set up, Fallout did augment the Ante from a character standpoint as Ethan's inner conflict, morality, and need to protect innocent people at any cost, was flaunted. Was there a definite point where you realized that you can make these fantasy scenes so characterful in this movie?

Well, it's interesting that the two things you quoted are my two favorite scenes in the movie. 19659003] We both have a good taste …

[ Laughs ] I think so. The whole sequence with Ilsa (Rebecca Ferguson) and Ethan – she follows him to London – is my favorite piece in the movie. And one big reason, why is that all that has never survived. It never makes a Mission: Impossible movie. Interestingly, there was never a problem. People, for whatever reason, really responded to this scene. The other scene you're talking about is called the "What if?". You need to know what's going to happen so you can enjoy it when things go wrong. And if we know it before, we do not have to explain it to you; the scenes become wordless. I did not foresee this scene in the movie, and Tom said what he would like to see is what should happen. It was very unusual that I did not even think to write it.

So I went back to write it and thought how in each of these someone explains it, so we know it does not really happen. What if I just omit the explanation? How would that feel? Of course, I designed it to leave an eye, a solid tracking shot of Ethan. After all, I knew instinctively not to use a sound design, but to use a score. I thought the music would be so raging, a shrill howl, something very disturbing. When [composer] Lorne Balfe played this piece of music for me, it was one of the first things Lorne wrote before there was even a movie. This play is about the wedding, the Ilsa and Ethan scene, but all the high strings are taken out. It also plays on the Ilsa-Luther (Ving Rhames) scene and the scene at the end. It became this music – high strings and low – that represented Ethan's burden and Ethan's remorse. It plays in all these moments in the movie. Eddie Hamilton, the editor, suggested that I sound design in Ethan's "What if?" And I said, "Why?" He said, "People, when they hear the music, they'll know right away that this is not really happening." I notice, "On the contrary, if you include sound design, they'll believe it happens, and if you discover it's not happening, they'll feel cheated, and when people find out, they want them to find out, before we retreat to White Widow's liaison. "This goes back to the scene at the beginning of the plutonium movie. We'll take you right to the edge of a darker, more catastrophic movie and remind you of what might happen. We let you feel what Ethan's fear is before we bring you back to reality. These were all these dreams: a constant reminder of Ethan's worst fears, which were conveyed so that you feel it instead of explaining it to you.

Every time I heard this tune, the movie had me in the palm of my hand.

It's effective composing. It's an excellent score. Interestingly, it is completely original. Much of the film is a manipulation of Lalo Schifrin's original score, and I am particularly proud that I think that the most emotional in the film is entirely Lornes music.

There are moments throughout the movie where Ethan is asked how he will do something and he answers with lines like, "I'll find out" or "I'm working on it." Were these moments meta-comment by yourself, as you often do not know the details? What's next?

What we're constantly talking about is that it's not unlike Mission: Impossible Mission: Impossible Mission: Impossible to see. What the team experiences, we often experience as a filmmaker. One is a reflection of the other. Whether that was conscious or not, that's very important to make these films. We will come up with something! The number of times I gave instructions to an actor and they say, "What do I answer?" I'll say, "I do not know what you're saying, but the way you answer it will inform. I'll create the thing you're responding to."

What happened during mid-production Break the most important addition to the script, based on the footage that was put together at that time?

London. Tom broke his ankle the first day as he shot the foot and we did not know what he meant with Benji (Simon Pegg). We were not sure if we had St. Paul's Cathedral. We did not know anything about the scene in which Hunley (Alec Baldwin) appears. That was totally to win. There were outlines of ideas, but they were not very dramatic. They only have many loose ends tied. They tied story points that we thought would need to bind them, but that was not really convincing. When Tom broke his ankle, I was able to find out the stuff.

When such challenges arise, including a broken ankle, a mustache, and a pregnancy, have you ever been trapped into thinking the universe is plotting against your movie or has always prevailed optimism?

Tom and I learned that we made nine films together in 12 years. Disaster is an opportunity to excel. If something goes wrong, it forces you to be more creative, and you finish the film over and over again, looking back at that thing and saying, "Boy, if that did not happen, imagine what the movie was like on plan "If Tom had not broken his ankle or if the weather had gone our way on a particular day, you would learn to embrace that stuff. They accept it as part of the process and just take it for what it is. Chaos is a very important part of the process – at least for us. It is an ingredient. It's not something we enjoy. I'm not one of those people who invite or create chaos. When the time comes, I know it's the biggest gift in the ugliest packaging.

In Fallout Julia rescues herself instead of returning to the camp and waiting to be rescued. They also avoid the usual trope where the ex-spouse of a spy or agent is upset. Ethan keeps track of what he thinks he did to Julia, and yet she has not stopped living. She went on; She is really happy. Can you speak of your talent in all your characters and how you did not make Julia a victim?

The simple rule was: women can not be virgins in need. And I almost took that too far – to the point where I almost did not have Ilsa in the situation she was doing. I then had the voice of a hyper-responsive internet in my head and said, "We really loved Ilsa in the last movie and you made her a maid in trouble." I thought to myself, "Hold on, everyone is in danger of the movie." It was not that she ended up on the net that she did; She had to free herself. And that made the difference. What I was particularly proud of when I stepped back out of the film is not four women; there are actually five. There are Erica Sloan (Angela Bassett), Julia, The Widow (Vanessa Kirby), Ilsa and the Parisian policeman (Alix Benezech). All the women in this film own the scenes they are in, and they all throw Ethan off balance. They are not people who somehow find Ethan dependent. They do not look to Ethan to protect themselves or solve their problem. His game is dropped by each one. That's what I like so much.

I'm curious about the final scene and how Ethan and Ilsa do not kiss each other again. When it came to Rogue Nation and Edge of Tomorrow I remember that you said instinct on the set made every decision. With Rogue I did not really want them to kiss, but in this movie, I persuaded myself how those two got through the Wringer. Maybe it would have been a bit strange for Ilsa to follow Julia's forehead and kiss with one of her own. However, instinct has again decided how Fallout played out its final scene?

Yes, it did not belong there. There was another scene that happened, and it happened instinctively. It was not written to the script. This part of the scene, I thought, was very effective. How they got into the scene was not, and it weakened Ilsa's character. It seemed to strengthen her, but it weakened her. We have discussed this scene for a long time. I finally realized that the only reason I have this scene in the movie is for aesthetic reasons, not because it makes them a stronger figure. It made Ethan's character more in her money – nothing to do with the kiss. We finally deleted it from the movie and it was not long before the photo of Ethan was shown. What people felt was that the relationship with Julia, whether you knew what it was or not, was not resolved in the context of our film. Why is he emotionally attached to this other woman if he has this other unresolved emotional relationship with Julia? Ethan just got confused. His wishes became confusing. His dreams and his fears became confusing. He felt a bit selfish. So there really was no way to have the kiss in the movie, just because of the construct of the Julia story. The Ilsa story has to wait for the dissolution of the Julia story, and at that time there is no time for her to have that moment. And at the end of the movie, I felt like I was not ready to define their relationship. I feel better because their relationship has not yet reached their endpoint. I want to see more of Ilsa. And once their relationship is resolved, there is no more tension.

Do you know what Ilsa said to Julia in the last scene?

I do not know what Ilsa said to Julia, and I did not ask it.

How many minutes of deleted material are you expecting on the Blu-ray at this time?

There are no deleted scenes. We have put together a deleted "film role". I firmly believe that the movie you see in the movies is the director's cut. If I can not defend it for the theatrical release, it does not belong in the movie. And yet, there were some really nice photos and some very nice moments with great locations. So, Eddie Hamilton and I created a little gift box. You can either view it with a comment explaining the process we use to do things, or you can just listen to it with music. A few minutes of things we did not want to cut out of the movie, but we had to. It's really a way to show people who are in the process that something can always go. You'll see a lot of those shots that are breathtaking, and while you want to see them in the movie, that's the discipline of filmmaking. There is a quote from Antoine de Saint-Exupery, who wrote The Little Prince, "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to remove."

Did Sean Harris make it harder for Solomon Lane to survive? [BecauseHarrisdidnotappearinseveralfranchisefilmsMcQuarrieHarrisagreedtomakeaquickstatementofpromisebefore Rogue Nation. ]

[ Laughs ] Not first, but because it was a very long shot, I think he probably wished someone would just kill him and put him behind him.

Mandatory Edge of Tomorrow Question: Have you ever thought about Rebecca? Ferguson would look like an exoskeletal suit?

[ Laughs ] I do not have. That's a damn good question. This is definitely worth considering if we ever shoot this movie.

Tom hat kürzlich gesagt, dass es 33 Jahre gedauert hat, um die Geschichte für eine Fortsetzung zu schreiben, mit der du vor acht Jahren intensiv befaßt warst. Seitdem hat sich viel verändert, aber hast du letzten Endes etwas dazu beigetragen, Top Gun: Maverick 's Geschichte und / oder Drehbuch?

Ich weiß, was es ist, und ich habe meine zwei gegeben Cent

Mission: Impossible – Fallout


Source link