A few days ago I looked at how well the first free agents Manny Machado and Bryce Harper fit into all 30 teams. What did not concern me was the question of which player I would prefer.
When the Nats' denied offer was leaked, many assumed that the super agent was behind it. Baseball officials and rival agents know the Boras game book ̵
Unlike last year, the tone at this week's GM meetings indicated that the teams are ready to spend this off-season for free agents.
Free agents willing to raise money for the big stars who will be appearing in trading rumors all winter long will keep you updated on the latest promotions.
Discussions on the many Facebook Message Boards I'm waiting for would not be the right answer either. Both are the epitome of the spoiled, lazy modern player and would be cancer in the clubhouse of any team trying to win. At least I read on. For whatever reason, people get very upset about things in social media.
There is no team in the majors that would not question Machado and Harper if they could afford it. You are so good. In fact, they are obviously good enough to cause widespread contempt, which is about as much of a compliment as you can get.
Let's start: If I lead a team, I would like to have one of the two players as a foundation piece. In the history of the big league, there are 45 players who have scored at least 580 runs in their 25-year season. This is Machado's career, seven times more than Stan Musial at the same age. Harper has created 682 runs, which take 22nd place in the ranking of 25-year-olds. He is in front of players like Shoeless Joe Jackson, Rogers Hornsby, Tris Speaker and Lou Gehrig.