قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Sports / MLB proposal would eliminate 42 minor league baseball teams

MLB proposal would eliminate 42 minor league baseball teams



The Professional Baseball Agreement (PBA) between Major League Baseball and Minor League teams expires at the end of the 2020 season. But if a new MLB proposal becomes a reality, more than three dozen cities with affiliated minor league teams will lose those teams in a year, and thousands of minor league players will also be unemployed.

The MLB proposal is just an idea at the start of a presumably lengthy negotiation, but both sides are farther apart than at any other PBA since 1990. At the heart of the negotiations, MLB is aiming for a dramatic improvement in the minor league baseball stadium Institutions and the control over the organization of the minor leagues in relation to affiliations and the geography of the leagues. These areas have been under the control of MiLB for over 1

00 years and would dramatically restructure the direction and operation of MiLB.

The MLB has put forward a proposal that, if adopted, would reduce the number of minor league baseball players over 100 years to 160 teams – excluding the complex league teams that are 100% owned by MLB – to 120 from 2021

The proposal is described as a preliminary offer subject to change. But if the proposal or a version of it is adopted, this will lead to the most dramatic restructuring of the minor leagues in more than half a century. The proposal not only eliminated more than 25 percent of MiLB teams but also dramatically overhauled the remaining leagues, with some leagues much smaller, others much larger, and teams nationwide changing classification levels.

Baseball America has been reporting for more than a year on the negotiations of the new PBA. This involved several discussions and interviews with owners and officials of MLB and MiLB. Because of the sensitive nature of the ongoing negotiations, almost all demanded anonymity. The owner group of Baseball America includes owners of minor league baseball teams, but reporting on this story was done independently.

"We are engaged in Major League Baseball through a successor agreement to the PBA. It's early in the negotiations and that's the highest thing I can say, "said Pat O & # 39; Conner, president of MiLB.

"We are in the early stages of negotiation, where each side presents the others with the concerns and concerns that affect them. From the point of view of the MLB clubs, our main goal is to improve the minor leagues we serve Believing that the standards for potential MLB players are inadequate and improving working conditions for them. MiLB players, including their compensation, are improving their transport and hotel accommodation, ensuring a better geographical association between the clubs of the major leagues and their affiliates Companies, as well as for a better geographical positioning of the leagues, in order to reduce the player traffic.

Before the start of the 2021 minor league season, minor league baseball and major league baseball must agree to a new PBA and both sides must ratify it.

Since 1903, there has always been an agreement between both en MLB and MiLB In 1990, a controversial PBA hearing resulted in MLB receiving a ticket tax from the MiLB teams and eliminating the MLB's payments to MiLB for player transactions and the requirements for significant improvements to the facility, before and since then were new PBA Agreements and renewals are generally uncontroversial with relatively few adjustments.

These PBA negotiations are already controversial: MiLB has long recognized the need for improved asset quality standards, which has not changed significantly since the 1990 PBA MiLB, however, quite satisfied with the current regime.

The MLB is ni with the current structure happy. According to MLB Owners and Front Office Officers, the current system, where MLB teams and MiLB clubs negotiate a two-year player development contract every two years, leads MLB clubs into space and geography linger in unwanted situations. For the past ten years, MLB owners have in some cases bought MiLB teams to avoid getting them into one of the worst stadiums in minor league baseball.

From MLB's perspective, this is about a quarter of all current stadiums MiLB clubs are far below the level of facilities they consider necessary for their minor league players. The MLB has essentially placed an obligation on MiLB to find a way to ensure that these stadiums reach all the standards that MLB considers acceptable in the near future. If the MiLB is unable to do so, the MLB proposes to reduce the number of affiliated minor league teams in order to work with the 75 percent of the MiLB clubs that the MLB considers capable of meeting the requirements in the future to meet their facilities. The MLB would work with MiLB and others to ensure that the remaining 25 percent of the clubs have some sort of baseball team, but they would no longer belong to MiLB clubs.

The MLB also wants to completely revise the PDC process to ensure that MLB clubs can be guaranteed by MiLB affiliates that geographically meet their needs. To this end, they want to cancel the current two-year PDC process and replace it with much longer-lasting MLB MiLB franchise agreements. This would give the MLB clubs much more security, but would also remove the bargaining leverage that MiLB teams currently have every two years.

And the MLB wants the MiLB to participate in the increased costs associated with rising player salaries. From MLB's point of view, there are several ways to achieve these goals, but their original proposal is one way to reach those goals.

The reason for the disagreement is a preliminary proposal that the MLB has offered to reduce its number of player development contracts (the affiliation agreement by which MLB teams provide players and staff with MiLB teams) from 160 to 120 This reduction would completely eliminate the four non-complex rookie-level and short-fogged ratings in the Foggy.

The proposal also rearranges the off-season leagues. While there would still be Triple-A, Double-A, High-Class A and Low-Class A, these four levels would be completely redesigned to make the leagues geographically much more compact. In Triple-A, the Pacific Coast League would move from 14 to 10 teams. The International League would grow to 20 teams. The 14-member league of low class A in the South Atlantic would be transformed into a league with six teams, and it would create a new league in the mid-Atlantic league.

The Northwestern league of the short season would switch to the year-round ball.

Following MLB's suggestion, some teams are being asked to switch from Class A to Triple-A. Others would be asked to switch from Triple-A to Class A, and there would be other less dramatic moves.

The proposal establishes assessments for the various levels. Triple-A has a value of 20 million US dollars. Double-A has a value of 15 million US dollars. High Class A is valued at $ 10 million. Low Class A has a value of $ 8 million and short season / rookie teams a value of $ 6 million. A team that moves from low class A to triple A has to pay $ 12 million for promotion. A team that was asked to switch from Triple-A to High-Class A would receive $ 10 million in compensation for the decline to a lower level. Price teams are currently out in the open. And while the ratings of the MiLB teams used to be largely tied to their classification, this is not really true on the open market. A low-income, low-income High State A Florida State League club has a selling price significantly lower than a low-income, high-income club.

Not all current year-round teams would survive in this proposal. Some short-season clubs are asked to upgrade instead of cut-out partners throughout the season. The proposal even proposes that two independent league clubs – in St. Paul, Minnesota, and Sugar Land, Texas – be merged.

  Baseballs_JohnMcCoyGetty.jpg

A Full History of the Working Agreement Between Major and Minor Leagues

From the beginning to the Golden Age, look at how MLB and MiLB work together – which has not always gone smoothly.

What would happen to the 42 current teams left over? without PDCs in the proposal? MLB proposes to set up the so-called Dream League.

As part of its overhaul, MLB would postpone the draft to August, reducing it to 20 to 25 rounds. Players who are not on loan have the option of playing in the Dream League (or in independent leagues). The Dream League would be a joint venture of MLB and MiLB. But essentially, it would be a quasi-independent league where the teams would pitch teams of non-retired players.

MLB teams would be limited in the proposal to setting up five minor league clubs in the United States. These are four year-round teams and a complex rookie partner. In addition to their 40-member squad players, each MLB team club would be limited to 150 players who have a Minor League contract for MiLB squads. Note that the proposal does not include roster restrictions for international players playing in the Dominican Summer League.

According to the current proposal, some teams would have to remove more than 100 players from their current MiLB rosters. The Yankees are currently hiring eight US Minor League members, which means they currently have up to 285 players under contract. Under this proposal, they would have to drop up to 135 players to meet the new restrictions. At the moment, there are no restrictions on the number of teams and thus the number of players a team can set up. According to this proposal, all MLB teams would be limited to the same number of teams and players.

The draft's postponement to August would likely have a significant impact. Since there would be no rookie-level teams with a short playing time and no complexity, conscripted players would probably not play any official games during their convocation year. instead, they would probably attend some scrimmages and instructional league games in August and September. Next spring, college players would likely switch to low-class A in their first full seasons, while high school players would come across international signers for a year or three in the complex leagues.

The draft is currently held at the end of the year Most of the state's high school baseball seasons and last month's college baseball season. If the draft were postponed to August, he would probably redesign the Summer Showcase, as high school graduates would still have two months to complete their studies to try to impress the Boy Scouts and revise MLB's proposal.

would create a seismic shift for minor league baseball. As negotiations are still at an early stage, it is unclear whether this proposal is a dramatic opening salvo aimed at reducing MLB's share of MiLB support spending, or a clear one Attempt to drastically reduce the size of the affiliate leagues. The MLB was able to withdraw its claims at any time in order to obtain smaller concessions from MiLB.

Regardless of whether the proposal of the MLB or a similar move is adopted, this would be the most dramatic revision of the minor leagues since its restructuring in 1962.

MLB teams are responsible for paying the wages and benefits of players and coaches Minor League teams are responsible, while Minor League teams are responsible for Minor League staff, travel expenses and other expenses. In a short-term or beginner-level club, the salaries of players and coaches – and the associated insurance for employees – can make up a significant proportion of the team's total spend.

Many people contacted stated that they had stated this. Expect MLB to increase salaries for players in smaller leagues in the near future. The expectation is that minimum salaries will be raised by 50 percent and reducing the total number of affiliates (and players) will help fund these increases. MLB is also currently involved in class action lawsuits by sub-league players claiming that they should have been paid for their time in spring training and extended spring training.

Owners of the retired minor league teams would expect compensation. It is likely that a number of local authorities would also take legal action to try to recover the money they have spent over the last few years upgrading their facilities to affiliated clubs that have been removed from the proposal.

Group of Haves (the remaining 120 teams with PDCs) and Have-Nots (the 42 teams that were left out of the new PBA), but it would likely have negative implications for all affiliated minor league clubs, as it probably does The ratings for all minor league clubs would lower teams.

Values ​​for affiliated clubs are dramatically higher than for independent minor league clubs, even in cases where the market and revenues of the Indy Club are comparable. The reason is largely related to the warranty of a PDC. While the number of independent (and summer college league) teams is theoretically infinite, there are a limited number of PDCs that bind teams to MLB teams. And in the last 30 years, this number has never dropped.

Teams have frequently swapped partners, but as long as a team has a PDC, membership of an MLB club is guaranteed.

The proposal of MLB Because the new PBA is limited to five years, compared to the seven years that PBAs traditionally had in the past. This proposal could also be a sign of future intentions. If MLB downsized the minor leagues by 42 teams in these negotiations, there is no guarantee that the next round of PBA negotiations will not look like the numbers are going to decrease further. Without the guarantee that a team can always have an MLB partner, the value of even the most successful MiLB teams in this uncertainty is likely to fall on the price.

The full details of how the Dream League or Leagues work is not yet clear. In the proposal, the teams would be responsible for paying the players and the coaching staff as well as the training staff, but there is also awareness on the part of the MLB that a form of subsidization would be required.

The MLB could possibly help teams identify players, but it seems teams are responsible for winning their own players. The expectation is that these players will receive very modest salaries to attract the attention of MLB scouts. The MLB clubs could then purchase the contracts of Dream League players in the season for $ 5,000 per purchase.

A rough estimate states that switching from affiliated baseball to this Dream League would lead to higher labor costs ranging from $ 300,000 to $ 400,000 comp and staffing.

Since markets are unlikely to bear the increased costs of the Dream League for most of the Appalachian and Pioneer league clubs, teams in these leagues should instead be formed under the auspices of amateur teams Summerwood Bats and organize the MLB. In this way, the MLB could assure cities that, while they no longer have teams affiliated with the MLB, they still have some sort of baseball that is somewhat linked to the MLB / MiLB umbrella.

The two sides have made October out of negotiations during the MLB playoffs, but they are expected to meet again in November. This could create an exciting momentum at this year's San Diego Winter Meetings, which are usually attended by Major League and Minor League owners.

This year is more than solemnly disputed. [19659047]
Source link