قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Mueller testimony: Special Adviser faces Congress for two blockbuster hearings

Mueller testimony: Special Adviser faces Congress for two blockbuster hearings



After weeks of negotiations, twists and turns of Muller's appearance and two summonses, the former Special Envoy will testify at 8:30 am to the House Judiciary Committee and at 12:00 pm to the House Intelligence Committee.

] The testimony of the former Special Representative comes closest to a moment of disruption, as is the case for Democrats in their investigation of the President. It is a possible turning point for the House Democratic impeachment commission to reset Mueller's conversation on the special-rights investigation and convince the public – and skeptical Democratic colleagues – that the House should conduct an impeachment investigation against Trump.

Even If there is no bomb-like revelation, the Democrats believe that Mueller's recitation of the key points of his investigation and what she revealed about the president can move the needle.

"It is important that the American people heard directly from Mueller what the report found, said House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler on" New Day "Tuesday CNN." Anyone else who has done what the report has revealed 'is being prosecuted.'

But if Muller's testimony does not change the conversation, it could mark the beginning of the end of democratic aspirations to sue the president.

] Ultimately, the direction Mueller's testimony takes may be from the lawyer himself Mueller is reluctant to join Capitol Hill and is largely a mystery to the public, despite the central and oversized role he played in Trump's presidency

Millions of viewers who send in will see the impressive image of the special lawyer sworn in for his testimony rd and his questions answered to him for the first time about the president and his own investigations.

The Reluctant Witness

Mueller and his team have said almost nothing in the two years since being appointed Special Adviser, preferring to allow the special The attorney's charges and then the 448-page report make the biggest one Part of his speech. It's been six years since Mueller stood in the light of a congressional hearing, and Wednesday's testimony is likely to be much more contentious, with each word being exponentially scrutinized.
Mueller has talked to a small group of aides at his supervisor Wilmer Hale, a law firm, and he intends to keep his testimony to the limits of the report, a spokesman said, agreeing with a letter from the Justice Department to be released on Monday was sent to Müller to limit his testimony to the document. Mueller will make an opening statement, but his written statement to the committees is simply the report itself.

Some Democrats have tried to lower expectations before hearing Mueller, hoping they will Even if he has recited the report has a lasting influence.

  Robert Mueller and his quest for justice

"Every single witness can really move the country in a certain direction", said Californian Democrat Adam Schiff, chairman of the House of Representatives secret service. "People are quite enthusiastic about their views on Trump and Russia, and in general only about their views on this president." If the president's racist portrayal last week was not enough to change attitudes, I do not know Bob Müller Will say. "

Democrats are aware, however, that Muller's words are of considerable importance. Mueller completed his investigation in March and Special Counsel's report was released in April. When Mueller finally spoke in May, stressing that the investigation did not free Trump from the disability and that he could not consider whether to accuse Trump of the Ministry of Justice's policies, he led a considerable number of House Democrats to call for impeachment [19659003] Trump's Republican allies in the Judicial and Intelligence Committee Muller are expected to press on a number of topics in order both to question the legitimacy of the Special Representative's investigations and to reiterate that Müller's investigations are not a criminal conspiracy between Trumps found team and Russia.

"I think he will stick to what the report says, he'll show there was no conspiracy or agreement, there was no disability charge," said Georgia Rep. Doug Collins, the supreme Republican in the justice panel. "And it's up to the Democrats to make it clear to the American people what they've been wasting their time and money on since the report was published."

The president himself has said he could see a "bit" of Müller hearing, and it's always possible that he – and his Twitter account – will respond in real time to the special lawyer. In the days leading up to the hearing, Trump made phone calls to aides and allies and expressed annoyance at having to watch the man whose investigations he has repeatedly referred to as "witch hunts" and "jokes."

What to expect

First and foremost is the Judiciary Committee, where lawmakers expect the potential for more fireworks, as the Committee is concerned with the obstruction of justice and the second volume of the Müller- Report focused.

Democrats in the committee say they plan to go over the 10 episodes of disability that Müller documented in his report. In particular, they will focus on five incidents, including Trump's efforts to sack the Special Representative, to persuade then Attorney General Jeff Sessions not to reuse, and to encourage witnesses such as Paul Manafort and Roger Stone not to cooperate in the investigation. 19659003] In his investigation, Müller said he relied on the Department of Justice's guidelines that a sitting president can not be charged. But Muller also said if his investigation could have cleared the president he would have done it, but it could not relieve Trump.

The news committee, which will convene in the same room after the approximately three-hour judicial session, will shift focus to Volume One and Russian electoral influence. There, the Democrats will try to accompany Müller through the numerous contacts between Trump's team and Russians to find that they were extremely problematic and disturbing, even if they were not criminal.

Müller's investigation did not reveal any criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, but it turned out that Trump's team had many ties to Russia and was to benefit from Moscow's hacking efforts.

Republicans in both committees may focus less on the report than on the team that created it, and on some of the issues raised in connection with the FBI investigation into Trump. They are expected to brief Müller on the anti-Trump text messages sent by members of his team and the use of an opposition research dossier to obtain a Democrat-paid foreign surveillance order.

Hearing Months in the Making

Muller's testimony before Congress was dubious in several places. Congressional Democrats hoped they would bring Müller to their committees as soon as he completed his investigation. They argued that Müller must defend herself against what she considers to be misleading narrative by Attorney General William Barr about the report and his decision, which the president had not committed.

First, the Democrats insisted on gaining access to the complete, unedited Müller report and the underlying evidence. After the Ministry of Justice resisted this effort, they turned their attention to the Special Adviser.

Weeks of negotiations followed, and the Democrats believed that they were close to reaching an agreement in May. But Müller did not want to testify before the Congress because he feared a political circus. In his last week, he spoke publicly as a special adviser, where he said he did not want to testify, and told Congress: "The report is my testimony."

But the Democrats were not convinced. They continued to call publicly for the appearance of the Special Representative and negotiations with Müller. Eventually, they agreed that on July 17, he should appear publicly before the Judiciary Committee and the Intelligence Committee if they issued a summons to enforce his testimony.

That still was not the end of the drama about Müller. Democrats argued with the Ministry of Justice and the Special Representative's team about whether Muller's deputies would appear after the Special Representative in a closed session. Junior members of the Judiciary Committee were furious that the agreement would not give them time to ask questions.

And so another turn was included in the Special Representative's appearance: His testimony would be delayed by a week, and he would hold a session of extra time at the Judiciary Committee so that all members can ask questions.

The proxy interview was also canceled, but Müller also wanted his former Chief of Staff Aaron Zebley to appear with him. Only a few hours before Muller was to appear on Tuesday, there was another shift in the hearing: Zebley was in some way to join Müller as a lawyer, protesting the Republican opposition to the short-term change.

Source link