قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Müller has not charged Trump – but his report is a brutal indictment

Müller has not charged Trump – but his report is a brutal indictment



Recent emails

Receive breaking news and special reports. The news and stories that mattered provided the day of the week in the morning.

9th April 2019, 8:00 GMT

By [19]

Jonathan Allen

President Donald Trump has evaded the lawsuit – but especially Attorney Robert Mueller's report is a brutal indictment of his election campaign and his presidency.

The first volume of the two-part, 448-page report describes how Trump and his allies solicited, encouraged, accepted, and accepted the American-sponsored aid as part of a multi-frontal attack on American democracy ,

The other contains extensive evidence that the President had obstructed justice through a behavioral pattern described by Müller as a "pattern of behavior," to which FBI Director Jim Comey had also attempted to remove Mueller, praise public witnesses, and to condemn and limit the scope of the investigation.

In summary, Müller's findings show three actions by Trump and his subordinate. Critics say that they are rattling the foundations of the American system of government, from the sacrosanct nature of democratic elections to the notion that no one, not even the president, passes over the law.

The story, even if most sympathetic, is one of a president who exercised almost every power that was customary in his office and in his persona – including hiring and shooting, bully pulpit, party loyalty, private intimidation and disinformation – to cover up the links between his campaign and Russia He could save the public humiliation of having won an election that was not quite up to par.

Of the marquee reports that Congress has written over decades of presidential scandals, the Mueller report is highlighted by the volatility of the CEO and the degree to which his subordinates' submissiveness, albeit marginally, subjected.

"If, after a thorough investigation into the facts, we had the confidence that the President ident did not appear to be obstructing, we would say so," wrote Mueller, "but based on the facts and applicable legal standards, we can not

Just over an hour before the report was published, Attorney General William Barr was selected for his job following his letter A president could not hinder justice, the report said there was "no collusion" between Trump and Russia – a phrase that Miller painstakingly explained in the report has no legal implications, but it is a popular art term for a Donald J Trump.

Some of Trump's allies on Capitol Hill were content to read Trump without reading the report The clear winner was – relieved because he was not prosecuted. [19659007] "We know the conclusions of # MuellerReport : No collusion, no further charges" Rep. Dan Crenshaw, R-Texas, tweeted, "It's over, we know the shoot, and we know that many people still say the president is guilty, I'll read the report completely, no shooting, just facts."

But Democrats saw Mueller's report as delineating the powers of the executive and legislature when it comes to judging the actions of a president.

Trump's own employees, including Barr and Mueller, did not go forward with an indictment – in fact, Mueller wrote that he had found that the Department of Justice prevented him from doing so. However, he also pointed out that the Congress, which does not report to the President, has its own powers.

"The obstruction of justice, whether criminal or otherwise, is deeply troubling in the President of the United States," said US Secretary of State Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff, D-California, on Thursday. "And it's clear that a special lawyer Mueller wanted Congress to consider the implications and consequences. "

Rep. Jerry Nadler, DN.Y., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said that Muller had set up a" Roadmap "for Congress ,

It's Hard To Fath Just as a lengthy public report is better for Trump than the topmost explanation of a clean health certificate he received a few weeks ago from Attorney General William Barr. The details of Müller's findings will be much more widely discussed in public. The special lawyer has already been invited to Capitol Hill to testify about his conclusions.

The Democrats will undoubtedly use their power in parliament to pull as much of Trump's political grief as possible while advocating the case of simply advocating small democratic values.

And while the political barrier to the removal of Trump is probably insurmountable – it would take 20 Republicans and all 47 Senate Democrats to overthrow him – the behavior that was recorded by Müller over that of Mueller According to experts [19659007] Kim Wehle, law professor at the University of Baltimore, who has studied Clinton as part of Independent Counsel's Kenneth Starr team, said Trump's case is "infinitely more serious" than the one she worked on.

"Here we have a hostile alien power, and the evidence is overwhelming that it was our goal to attack ours a free and fair process," she said.

Frank O. Bowman III, a professor at the School of Law at the University of Missouri and author of the forthcoming book, "High Crimes and Offenses: A History of Dismissal for the Age of Trump." The Müller report indicates that the president committed criminal offenses.

"The question of dismissal concerns not the violation of a penal code but the question of whether a president is involved in a pattern of activity that contradicts his duty to ensure that the law is faithfully executed and instead seeks his authority to undermine the institutions and norms of the justice system to help themselves, "he said. "The second half of the Müller report argues for such a conclusion in relation to Trump."

Bowman said that Trump's behavior was haunted by President Richard Nixon's failure to follow Trump's subordinates' orders – most likely with the Nixon example in mind – can ultimately save the president politically.

"The fact that they have rejected does not change the unconstitutional indictment," he said. "The fact that he has been so cautious so often will make it easy for Republicans in Congress to dismiss his otherwise offensive behavior."

If this is the case, the question arises as to whether Muller's findings make Trump unsuitable for the post. The jury always wanted him: voters. However, the special adviser's report is an indelible proof of the President's weakness in seeking Russian help and deceiving the nation.


Source link