Jared Kushner, adviser to the White House, has heard that Russia's intervention in the 2016 presidential election was no more than a few ads on Facebook. As another Trump government official said, President Donald Trump has repeatedly condemned this.
But none of these claims are true.
In his first public commentary since the Mueller report was released last Thursday, Kushner downplayed Russia's intervention campaign – an interview with Time magazine during the Time 100 summit in New York City. He went so far as to say that investigations into Russia's interference in the country were more damaging than Russia's attack on American democracy.
"You see what Russia has done by buying some Facebook ads to try to sow dissent and do it and it's a terrible thing," said Kushner. "But I think the investigation and all the speculation that has taken place in the last two years has influenced our democracy much harder than a few Facebook ads."
Here is the video in which Jared Kushner plays Russian disruptions as "a few Facebook ads" and says that he thinks, "The following investigations were much more harmful to our country." pic.twitter.com/JkiIjQng48
̵1; Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) April 23, 2019
Kushner is mentioned in Müller's report. A lot of.
Kushner is hardly an uncontested source in relation to Russia's intervention campaign. He was at the infamous Trump Tower meeting in June 2016 between a Russian lawyer who had promised Hillary Clinton as "part of Russia and his support for Mr. Trump," and suggested a secret return channel for direct communication with the Kremlin , is about US intelligence. He was often mentioned in Mueller's report for these and other activities that have not been fully explained.
Regardless of what Kushner said on Tuesday, it is not that Russian intervention did not go beyond a handful of Facebook ads. According to information released by the House Intelligence Committee last year, Russian agents actually purchased about 3,500 Facebook ads during the 2016 presidential campaign and spent more than $ 1 million a month to reach about 10 million users. Meanwhile, Russian agents also bought ads on Instagram and created thousands of bot accounts on Twitter that propagate almost exclusively propaganda to help Trump damage Hillary Clinton.
In addition, Kushner's remarks on Tuesday completely ignore the kreml-staged hacker campaign Democratic goals – hacks that have led to WikiLeaks publishing tranches of e-mails online during key campaigns of the 2016 campaign. Trump mentioned WikiLeaks about five times a day in the last weeks of the campaign, but recently claimed he knew "nothing about WikiLeaks … it's not my cup of tea."
Kushner added: "The Mueller report was one thing It was conclusive that there was absolutely no coordination or coordination with the Trump campaign, anything the President has said, and I've said it for two years, is
In fact, the Mueller report says that the Trump campaign "expected the information to benefit from information stolen and released by Russian efforts." What a "comprehensive and systematic" intervention campaign Kushner's name is mentioned 263 times.
A White House spokesman claimed that Trump had repeatedly denounced Russian interference.
While Kushner had downplayed Russia's interference in New York City, the spokesman for the Trump administration Hogan Gidley falsely believes in the White House that Trump has "repeatedly denounced" Russia's interference  But as Maggie Haberman of The New York Times referred to in the above tweet, Trump did nothing like that. Indeed, during his notorious press conference with Vladimir Putin last summer in Helsinki, Finland, Trump said he had accepted Putin's word that the Russian was not interfering with the conclusions of his own intelligence services.
"My people came to me, Dan Coats came to me and some others said they think it's Russia," Trump said. "I have President Putin. He only said that it is not Russia. I will say that. I see no reason why it would, but I really want to see the server.
The White House quickly tried to reject Trump's comments, but it was far from the only time that the President sounded skeptical of the conclusion of the intelligence services that Russia intervened on his behalf. In contrast, Trump repeatedly and forcibly denounced the investigation against Russian interference, including even after Mueller had finished his work when Gidley was asked if Trump the Russian Would accept help again in 2020. In particular, he did not say "no" and added, "I do not understand the question." Gidley's comments came two days after Trump's personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, received an opinion. Sunday morning news shows that "there is no point in taking information from Russians," and completely ignores the fact that the information in question is due to crime acquired against American citizens.
The news is moving fast. To stay up to date, follow Aaron Rupar on Twitter and read more about Vox's Political and Political Reporting .