قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Müller's case is a slam dunk and he's too slimy to be freaked out

Müller's case is a slam dunk and he's too slimy to be freaked out



The long-awaited indictment of Roger Stone finally fell on Friday and landed on Stone like the proverbial ton of brick. As someone who has been prosecuting scooters Libby and others on similar charges and defending charges against similar charges as alleged here – false statements, obstruction of the judiciary, and manipulation of witnesses – my point is that Stone should start fixing his business , Without pardon by the President (always the wildcard option with a POTUS like Trump) Stone is convicted and receives a very high prison sentence. This is so close to a slam-dunk case that a prosecutor will ever bring.

There are several types of defense mechanisms that are normally used to defend such a case, and none of them are possible here.

"Actually, I did not say what the government says I said / the government did not understand what I said."

This defense can often work when the wrong statements are based on a field representative interview Just make a note of the interview and do not write it down. In these cases, defendants can plausibly argue that they either did not understand the agent's questions or that the agents did not properly understand their response or did not remember their memory. Any ambiguity in the question or answer can be exploited. But that does not work for Stone because the entire Congressional hearing was literally transcribed. The questions and answers were under oath and were in no way ambiguous or open to interpretation.


Source link