This article was originally published in The Guardian and appears here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.
The issue of climate change information published by NASA to the public is under the Trump administration with a Fear "within the agency claims has led to an online retreat on the subject.
Laura Tenenbaum, a former science communicator at NASA, said she was warned by the term "global warming" in social media because of her focus on climate change.
"NASA says it's the same, but that's not true," said Tenenbaum, who left NASA in October after a decade with the space agency.
"They have stopped promoting or stressing communication in climate research, they have minimized it, and the people in the agency are worried that Trump will cut off funding for climate research because there is fear and anxiety, and the result was chaos. "
Tenenbaum said that about a month after Trump's inauguration last year, a" laborious review process "was introduced via every blog post, Facebook post, and tweet. He was from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California pushed out.
"I was told by the media reports that climate change is a sensitive issue because of Trump as president," she said. "There was confusion about what we should do now, we have a president who does not believe in climate change, everyone was in a mess, it was chaos."
Planned blog posts on coal-fired power plants converted into solar panels, "Reasons "To be positive about NASA" and an interview with Gavin Schmidt, an experienced NASA climatologist, were either stopped or due to disruptions of Laut Tenenbaum, the staff of the University are nervous, which could provoke the new government.
The numbers show that there has been a marked decline in the climate information produced by NASA since the election of the Trump administration. In 201
In January 2017, the month of the Trump inauguration, there were 53 Facebook posts that NASA is not approaching this total since the release of 21 times in March and 31 times in April
This decline in posts has too dwindling interactions with the public on Facebook. In January 2017, there were more than 61,700 interactions – defined as likes, comments and shares – on the climate side. Since then, this has fallen dramatically, in April there were only 7,000. In April 2016, there were more than 100,000 interactions under the Obama administration.
NASA's "Earth Right Now" blog, for which Tenenbaum wrote, also saw a decline in activity, with only two originally produced posts since Tenenbaum's last entry in August 2017. Tenenbaum said she had been warned with the media and then she was offered another job at the agency before taking a leave of absence and then resigning.
The NASA Climate Change website and the Facebook page are still clearly showing their results. Like other scientific organizations, the world is warming and the seas are rising.
A NASA spokesman said that "there have been no political changes in how we communicate science to the American public."
"NASA Communications has We have not been given a policy to change how we communicate about agency research, including climate change," he added.
"The frequency of blog posts on climate.nasa.gov has always varied according to availability of staff and other factors including mission activities (launches, expeditions on the field, etc.)."
There were some fears within NASA about Trump's aversion to climate science – which he used to call "bullshit" "dizziness" inspired by China – and his government's efforts to combat global warming.
The White House's proposal to cut funding for NASA's earthworks, the satellites used to measure climate, soils, forest fires, and weather events such as hurricanes, is also a bone of contention.
An agency scientist who did not want to be named said, "Some people are fearful, some are defiant, and some put their noses on [the] whetstone and keep coming up with it."
NASA has not yet the controversy surrounding the Environmental Protection Agency, whose administrator Scott Pruitt denied basic facts about climate science, modeled scientific panels to involve more industry representatives, and oversaw the removal of climate change information from the EPA website for a "review," which took more than a year.
Kate Marvel, climatologist at Columbia University and NASA Goddard The Space Research Institute, which said it speaks in person, said nobody told her to "shut up".
"Physics does not change just because the administration has changed," she said. "It's my job to understand how the planet works, and I'll continue to do that."
Jim Bridenstine, NASA's new administrator and former Republican Congressman, has previously expressed doubts about mainstream scientific science
But he appeared to be shifting his position during a televised meeting with NASA workers earlier this month to have.
"I do not deny the consensus, I fully believe in climate change and that we contribute to people" This is a greenhouse gas and we are adding it to the atmosphere in volumes we have not seen before, "said Bridenstine are responsible for that. "