Save the planet? Maybe not. Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson's Earth Day Post told us why Save Earth is a pointless call. On Earth Day on Sunday, the famous scientist went on Twitter to correct the popular sentence:
The eternal cry for "Save the Earth" is strange: Planet Earth survives massive asteroid strikes – it becomes everything We will do it, but life on earth will not do it.
Tyson has one point: Planet Earth is still strong after 4.5 billion years and has adapted to natural disasters that have destroyed entire species and groups of animals (RIP dinosaurs). The semblance of Homo sapiens even existed. While scientists have predicted various ways in which life on earth will eventually end, Tyson suggests that present-day life must be saved on Earth
Earth is quite resilient and adaptable, despite great threats during its lifetime. Scientists generally agree that the Earth has already gone through five mass extinctions and that it is currently going through its sixth, the difference between this and the previous five being that humans cause latency and extinction. When planetary scientist Carolyn Porco commented on Twitter, " Save Earth " is an acronym for saving the (viability of) the oceans and surfaces and all life on this planet.
Science communications Expert Aaron Huertas also picked up on the catchy environmental slogans . "Admittedly," The relatively stable biosphere in which human civilization evolved does not have the same sound, "Tweeted he.
For now, Earth could survive for at least another five billion years, with the torch finally extinguishing the sun – just before a big catastrophic event, like a volcanic apocalypse or some other asteroid. People could take another billion years before the sun gets too hot to be habitable on Earth, Science X reported. But to put it this way, humans would have to mitigate the risk factors that are destroying human civilization accelerate. These risk factors include habitat destruction, unchecked population growth, and economic activities that contribute to global warming. A study reported by National Geographic suggests that the extinction of species is 1000 times faster in humans than if there were no humans.
According to the 2014 report "Human and Nature Dynamics" Analysis of the Collapse or Sustainability of Societies:
The two main solutions are to reduce economic inequality in order to ensure a fairer distribution of resources and resource use drastically using less renewable resources and reducing population growth.
More to follow …