قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / New leak claims Trump made Iranian nuclear deal "despite Obama"

New leak claims Trump made Iranian nuclear deal "despite Obama"



  US President Donald Trump

Image Rights
AFP

Donald Trump has abandoned the Iranian nuclear deal to defy Barack Obama, as evidenced by a leaked note written by the former British ambassador to the United States ,

Sir Kim Darroch described the move as "diplomatic vandalism," according to Mail on Sunday.

The memo was written after Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson appealed to the United States in 201

8 to abide by the nuclear agreement.

Under this agreement, Iran agreed to limit its sensitive nuclear activities.

In exchange for the lifting of crippling economic sanctions, he would also allow international inspectors.

However, President Trump did not believe that the agreement had gone far enough.

Following the return of Mr. Johnson from the United States to Britain, Sir Kim wrote that President Trump apparently gave up the nuclear deal for "personality reasons" because the pact had been agreed by his predecessor Barack Obama.

The British ambassador is said to have highlighted the divisions among the US presidential advisers and the White House has no "everyday" strategy What to do after leaving the contract?

The paper reports that Sir Kim wrote a memo to Mr. Johnson, stating, "The result illustrated the paradox of this White House: you were given exceptional access because all stayed away from the president, but the content of the administration is fixed diplomatic vandalism, apparently for ideological and personal reasons, was Obama's business.

Image Rights
AFP / PA Media

Caption

Mr. Trump had said "we would not be." to deal with it "" Sir Kim Darroch

"Moreover, they can not formulate a" day-after "strategy, and contacts with the State Department this morning do not suggest a plan to reach partners and allies, be it in Europe or in the region."

The recent revelation came despite a warning from Scotland Yard to the media to leak leaked diplomatic memos.

They warned that journalists who published further details of the former ambassador's communications may violate the Official Secrets Act.

In a case published a week ago, the then British ambassador described the Trump administration as "awkward and awkward."

  • What is the Official Secrets Act? Response from the US president, who described Sir Kim as "a very stupid guy" he would not deal with anymore.

    The government reportedly initiated an internal Whitehall investigation into the publication.

    But Sir Kim On Wednesday he resigned as US ambassador and said it was "impossible" to keep going.

    Following his resignation, the police initiated a criminal investigation into the causes of the leak. Scotland Yard Deputy Commissioner Neil Basu said there was a "clear public" interest "in bringing those responsible to justice.

    But editors and high-ranking politicians – including the two men, the vying for appointment to the next Prime Minister – criticized his warning not to publish any further details.

    Foreign Minister Jeremy Hunt said he had defended the right of the press to release leaks "to the limit" when they "judge that they

    His rival Boris Johnson said It was right that the person responsible for the leak was "hunted down and prosecuted." As a backlash, Asst Commissioner Basu added that the Met had "no intention" to prevent the publication of stories in the public interest ,

    However, he added, "We have also been notified of the publication of these specific documents, as we now know you could be a violation of the OSA [Official Secrets Act] could also constitute a criminal offense and not involve any defense of public interest."] The newspaper spokesman said it was in the public interest and revealed "important information" about the United Kingdom's attempts to prevent President Trump from abandoning the Iranian nuclear deal.

    He added, "What could be more in the public interest than a better understanding of how that position was achieved, what can have serious consequences for world peace?"

    In response, a spokesman for the Foreign Office said "completely unacceptable leak" of "sensitive material" and urged the source of the leak to "face the consequences of their actions".

    He added that it was "nothing new" that Britain and the United States differ in their approach to preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.


Source link