Home / Business / NTSB steps in Tesla Off Crash Probe for breach of disclosure requirement

NTSB steps in Tesla Off Crash Probe for breach of disclosure requirement

The National Transportation Safety Board withdrew Tesla Inc. from its role in investigating a fatal accident with one of its vehicles and said that the electric car manufacturer had not agreed to disclose information during the investigation was in progress.

"While we understand the demand for information that parties face during an NTSB investigation, uncoordinated publications of incomplete information do not lead to traffic safety or serve the public interest," said NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt in a statement

the decision Wednesday evening in a call to Tesla's Elon Musk,

The unusual move followed company's public allegations blaming the driver of a Tesla Model X who died in a March collision, apparently infringement of agency records. The NTSB carefully monitors the integrity of its investigations and requires participants to abide by the rules, what information they can post and what cooperation they expect. These so-called investigative parties must sign legal agreements setting out their responsibilities.

"It is regrettable that Tesla's actions did not comply with the party agreement," Sumwalt said.

Tesla shares tumbled 1 percent to $ 297.80 at 2:12 am in New York after plummeting by as much as 2.4 percent following Bloomberg's report on NTSB action.

Tesla stated in a statement released late Wednesday that he wanted to leave the probe.

Earlier: Tesla Retires from NTSB Crash Probe Autopilot Data Flap

"Tesla withdrew from the NTSB's party agreement because it requires that we release any information about autopilot to the public, a requirement which we believe fundamentally affects public safety, "the company said via email. "We believe in transparency, so an agreement that prevents the disclosure of information for more than a year is unacceptable."

Tesla said that while it will not be a formal probing party, it will continue to provide technical assistance Englisch: www.socialistgroup.eu/gpes/sessiond…01&place=STR Having more of an NTSB investigation can lose access to the information discovered in the investigation and the ability to keep the official records of the incident, said Peter Goelz, a former Managing Director at NTSB, who is now Senior Vice President at O & # 39; Neill & Associates, a lobby and public relations firm in Washington, is.

Will not Hinder

"By leaving the process, you are truly leaving the game in a critical element of the investigation," he said. "It will not stop the investigation, and it will not hinder the investigation."

The dispute between the security agency and the automaker goes down in company statements about Walter Huang, a 38-year-old, back in his Model X last month using the driver assistance system known as the Autopilot.

In a March 30 blog post Tesla said the model X driver's hands were not on the steering wheel for six seconds, a fatal accident. A spokesman for NTSB said the agency was dissatisfied with the company for disclosing details during the investigation.

Musk and Sumwalt telephoned on the weekend and had what a spokesman for the agency said back then, a constructive conversation. Musk promised to follow the NTSB rules so the company would not comment on the investigation.

Related: Tesla retreats to Model X driver for alleged autopilot death

But this week, Tesla responded to a local TV appearance of Huang's family [19659024] The "only" explanation for the crash was that he "the Road does not pay attention, even though the car makes several warnings. "

The company's statements violated the agency's record for parties to an accident investigation for the cause of the crash, Goelz said.

"The NTSB is a trusted investigative body, and its processes can be challenging and frustrating, but they are ultimately fair," Goelz said over the phone. "Mr. Musk and his company and, frankly, the future of autonomous vehicles would have been better served if they had followed the rules and continued to fully participate in the investigation."

The Action, the company of the Removing the probe was limited to the most recent fatal accident. Tesla is still a formal participant in the NTSB investigation of a January collision with a Tesla Model S, which used the autopilot when he parked a fire engine on the freeway near Los Angeles

Tesla's bid to defend autopilot is significant. The NTSB's investigation into the March 23 crash involving Huang contributed to a large sell-out of the company's stock. Muscovy claimed almost 18 months ago that the system would eventually enable Tesla vehicles to self-drive, and much of the value of the $ 50 billion company is associated with the view could be an Autonomous Autopionier [19659004] The Authority has in some cases kept airlines, aircraft manufacturers and unions in the hands of investigators in cases where they either made unauthorized statements or did not produce information expected by the NTSB.

Small agency

Because it is relatively small. Www.bakom.ch The security authority has pre – emptive authority, which in rare cases uses it to force companies involved in investigations to provide information.

NTSB rules do not prohibit investigators from publishing general information about their products. The Agency's often repeated rule of thumb is that factual information that could have been published before an accident can be erased afterwards.

What the NTSB bans is releasing information about the accident itself.

In December 2010, the security agency removed American Airlines, now part of the American Airlines Group Inc., from an investigation into a runway accident in Jackson Hole, Wyoming , American had taken one of the two crash-proof recorders of the plane and downloaded its contents before handing it over to the agency.

In 2014, United United Parcel Service Inc. and its pilot union out of the race inspected a cargo plane crash that killed two people in Alabama. The security agency then said that the company and the union "had taken action against the investigation by providing comments and analyzing results before the NTSB met."

"When a party spreads information about the accident, it may reflect the bias of that party," said NTSC Vice President Christopher Hart. "This will penalize the other parties and make them less willing to participate in the process, which can undermine the whole investigation."

Source link