A Former Tesla Engineer Approved on Monday Before leaving the company and joining a competitor, he uploaded Tesla files to his personal iCloud account and created .zip files with the " Business secrets "of the autopilot. However, former employee Guangzhi Cao denies Tesla's claim that he was involved in a theft of trade secrets.
"Despite the vague implication in Tesla's complaint (and the above statement of facts) that his trade secrets are in danger and that Tesla must learn what Cao has done with Tesla's intellectual property," … the truth in this case is that Cao has done absolutely nothing with Tesla's intellectual property, "said a joint statement by Cao, which responds to the allegations of the electric car manufacturer against him.
This week, Cao has confirmed Ledge Tesla's allegations that he has classified a number of the company's intellectual property rights as true, but he claimed it was incorrect to call his actions trade a theft. Cao also admitted that he had not told Tesla that while he was working in the company, he had recorded the company's source code in his personal accounts, but the company had never asked for it after referring to Xiaopeng Motors (also known as XMotors or XPeng) had gone. a Tesla rival based in China. Cao created the .zip files at the end of 201
Tesla filed a lawsuit against Cao in March This year, he claimed to have uploaded more than 300,000 files and directories with source code for the company's autopilot to his iCloud account, "repeatedly logged into the secure networks of Tesla "to clear its browsing history, and recruit another Tesla employee for its current account, said The Verge.
"Without immediate relief, Tesla believes that Cao and his new employer, [XPeng]will continue to have unrestricted access to Tesla's marquee technology, the product of more than five years of work and over hundreds of millions of dollars of investment they do not own "the lawyers of the company wrote according to Verge.
Cao's inclusion this week is indeed in line with part of Tesla's allegations – yes, he has uploaded a lot of company source code into his personal account, but no, he did not use that information for his new employer. In fact, Cao has voluntarily offered to hand over Tesla forensic copies of his personal electronic devices and their entire contents for investigation.
"This is a legal dispute over routine off-boarding issues from employees that could and should have been resolved by Tesla, either through its own personnel or information technology policies," Cao wrote in the Joint Statement, "or alternatively by a pre-scribal , which raised concerns raised by Tesla in a public appeal in first instance. "