People who study genetically modified foods most intensively believe that they know a lot about nutritional science, but they know it least. This emerges from a published in January in the journal Nature Human Behavior peer review. 1
The survey, conducted by four universities, surveyed 2,000 people in Europe and the US on how much they know about GM food, what their opinion was and how intense it was.
Then a series of true or false questions were asked about the science, starting with basic questions such as whether the core of the earth is hot or cold on genetics issues, such as "Does not have a genetically modified tomato genes ? "
The results showed that the more people reported to fight GMO, the lower the test result. 19659006] "Many people are upset about genetically modified foods," said Sydney Scott, a marketing professor at Washington University in St. Louis, one of the schools that conducted the study.
"We need to get people to recognize gaps in knowledge before we try to teach them new things and have meaningful discussions," she added.
Opponents of genetically modified foods do not attach much importance to the study.
"The really flawed science is that the Food and Drug Administration is not rigorously testing genetically modified foods," said Alexis Baden-Mayer, political director of the Anti-GMO Organic Consumers Association.
She said her organization wanted a "thorough scientific review of genetically modified foods using date test practices."
Scott said Baden-Mayer got a point and stressed that it was in the study about the correlation of scientific knowledge and consumer behavior was not just about the science of GMOs. However, she said, consumers will often find out less about the facts if they feel passionate about it, "especially if they feel that they are questioning their moral values."
It's very unnatural in a way that they find almost morally disturbing, "said Scott.
Researchers from the University of Colorado Boulder, the University of Toronto and the University of Pennsylvania also participated in the study The National Science Foundation has been paid primarily by grants from the National Science Foundation.
They plan to continue further studies on what the findings might look like in other controversial science topics such as immunization, nuclear and homeopathic medicine.