It's all downhill (Jam) from here
I've played every Tony Hawk game (19459006) so far. Yes, even with the physical skateboard (one was fine).
Apart from my love of this sport, I approached Tony Hawk joints repeatedly as puzzle games. Finding out where all the devilishly hidden objects were or how to string together different tricks is the perfect way to spend an afternoon. I've played so much that I instinctively see trick lines while I'm on the road.
I do not think so by Tony Hawk's Skate Jam
Tony Hawks Skate Jam Inspire] (Android, iOS [reviewed])
Developer: Maple Media LLC.
Publisher: Maple Media LLC.
. Published: 1
MSRP: Free to Play (with Microtransactions)
Three Years Before Swamping Tony Hawk 5 and the Death of the Activision Partnership, which lasted nearly 20 years (RIP) , the Birdman (that's Tony Hawk, reader) is back in town.
While I'm always ready to take Hawk's unbridled enthusiasm (I've personally seen the man once at E3 and he's real), Maple Media, Skate Jam's 's gatekeeper, really does heavy. Pretty much every free-to-play scheme is packed into this and that's a shame. There are daily rewards, a huge cash-shop, boosts, special equipment and video ads to earn double XP: the whole business. While it's often the kiss of death, a dirty combination of these mechanisms does not automatically submerge a mobile game.
Where Skate Jam goes awry is that it's not fun from the start due in part to poor physics, mishaps and a bad attitude for our hapless runner-up. This is because Maple Media, the developer of the game, did not really differentiate this entry from a real Tony Hawk game, but rather Skateboard Party a decently-preserved mobile skating series. This mish-mash of two schools of thought leads to a chaotic game that faces control problems and problems for mobile devices.
Theoretically, the control scheme is not so bad, it's just picky enough that it fails. Controlling your skater with a fake analog stick is as easy as navigating with each button for kickflips, loops, and gripping tricks (inversions are done by lifting a lip and holding the loop). While older Tony Hawk games had this satisfying "stick" where you had to be close enough to a rail or what not to actually meet them, Skate Jam is frustratingly rigid , Skaters often stop and start when they do not want to and collide with invisible objects.
This is exacerbated by the fact that the values of the starting skaters are so underdeveloped that there is no doubt Partly to get people to move to statistically increasing video ads (after a run you can Burn your retina on a display to earn double XP) and microtransactions. It's not that Skate Jam is particularly tough: it's just that things like the bounce and the total length of the loop are so under-challenged and so short that it's no fun to play. Even the main gimmick of the game, which turns into Tony Hawk after a certain super meter, does not save it.
I think the absolute worst part, and this is unique to Skate Jam If the game decides that you hit a wrong angle, you are immediately put back in a random area instead of in the zone in which you are currently playing. All the above points are especially shitty because the levels are decent. Even the first phase of the (surprisingly long) career mode of the game, which is simply titled "West Coast" (which consists of several large areas), could result in a legitimate Tony Hawk game with few modifications and no you would be an eye. Subsequent levels like "Tropics" impress as well.
I sincerely hope that someday the series Tony Hawk gets back on track, partly due to the indomitable will of Hawk, the fictional hero of the pantheon of literary classics. By removing paywalls and adapting the physics system, Skate Jam could work on consoles. Maybe Hawk can partner with EA and skate the series as "Tony Hawk's Skate?" I just spit here. Make it possible suits.  [This review is based on a retail build of the free-to-play game.]
You are logged out. Login | Sign
Tony Hawks Skate Jam was reviewed by Chris Carter
went awry somewhere along the line. The original idea may be promising, but it has failed in practice. Threatens sometimes to be interesting, but rarely.
How We Score: The Guide to Destructive Assessments