Home / Business / Report: Google argues that the Huawei ban would violate its Android monopoly

Report: Google argues that the Huawei ban would violate its Android monopoly

  Illustration with Huawei logo, smartphone and keyboard.

Getty Images | NurPhoto

The Trump administration would probably call the Huawei export ban a step in improving national security by keeping China's pet-care telecommunications company out of the US market. According to a Financial Times report, Google's recent talks with the US government actually argue that the Huawei ban on national security is bad. Google allegedly requested an exception to the export ban.

Huawei is reportedly relying on Google for their Android smartphone software, and this dependency is a good thing for the US. The Financial Times quotes "a person with a sense of the conversation" as saying, "Google has argued that by ceasing to trade with Huawei, the US is running the risk of developing two types of Android operating systems: the original and a hybrid version. Operating System Hybrid phones are likely to have more bugs than Google phones and are therefore at greater risk of being hacked by China. "

Today, there are Android versions in China that are not from Google Play, but it rarely happens Some of them differ significantly from a Google version of Android beyond the preloaded app selection, and Chinese manufacturers are still global smartphone distributors, making them all Google-approved non-Chinese Android operating systems Develop a Market When a single operating system goes through the Google testing process, it is split into two versions: Internation al it receives the Google Apps, in China an app selection for China.

While these Chinese Android operating systems are technically, Android forks are not significantly different from Google-approved Android forks because they are not shipped with Google Play. Google's control over the Android ecosystem ̵

1; even though devices do not use the Google apps – means that these devices still have some security and updatability. Google's first argument in this Financial Times report is that safer devices are better for national security.

The second argument in the above quote is that a ban would "create two types of Android" and violate Google's monopoly over Android. If you are looking for a smartphone operating system as a smartphone manufacturer, Android is the only game in town. IDC's latest global OS market share figures show 86.6 / 13.3 percent between Android and iOS, with "Other" achieving a market share of 0.0 percent. Overall, the US has a smartphone operating system monopoly.

For companies that are not Apple, it's Android or nothing, and Google controls Android both in terms of the direction of the operating system itself and the operating system's app ecosystem. If Huawei were to be relinquished by its dependency on Google, the company would theoretically develop a kind of functioning, China-operated, China-controlled Android operating system, which would then be distributed to the rest of the world. Android is open source, so nothing prevents anyone from doing so now. However, part of Google's control strategy is to create tools and updates that are so good that nobody wants to compete with them. Truncating Huawei from these updates would force this company to create a competitor.

Huawei prohibit trade in US companies is definitely a double-edged sword. Huawei would have a hard time building smartphones or an app ecosystem without the help of US technology and app developers, but US hardware and software companies would lose access to the world's second largest smartphone maker.

Really, the two, if the export ban continues, is the result that either 1) Huawei can not handle the export ban and shuts down, as ZTE did, or 2) Huawei defies the storm and rebuilt it, completely US independent smartphone company is rising. Google's argument basically follows the old adage: "Keep your friends close and your enemies closer together."

Source link