Home / Entertainment / Scarlett Johansson says she should be able to play "every person, every tree or every animal".

Scarlett Johansson says she should be able to play "every person, every tree or every animal".

  Scarlett Johansson, smiling.

Scarlett Johansson at the world premiere of Avengers: Endgame .

The Revolutionary Glamor of the US Women's National Team

  • In 2008, Nadal revealed Federer's biggest mistake. There is nothing to reveal in 2019.

  • Tennessee celebrates Nathan Bedford Forrest Day. Here is the original report from the congress on Fort Pillow

  • Midsommar : Real villains are not murderous pagans. They are students.

  • Scarlett Johansson, who was confronted with an Asian character in Paramount's live action Ghost in the Shell was featured in the upcoming Tex Gill biography Rub & Tug which she withdrew from the role, has further considerations about what parts should be filled. In an interview with As If, the actress complained about political correctness in the arts and said, "As an actor, I should be able to play any person, tree, or animal, because that's my job and the requirements my job. "

    Johansson's comments have been picked up by the Daily Mail and have already caused enough uproar so that the actress has released a statement that the article "was edited for click-bait and was largely taken out of context". The context is missing: The interview is not a standard profile. Instead, Johansson and the contemporary painter David Salle worked together on a photo shoot of the actress, in which he showed his work. Johansson and Salle then talked about the project. Part of the context that Johansson refers to is probably the shoot itself, in which Salle Johansson asked "to play with the idea of ​​living in a tree," says photographer Tatijana Shoan, which is why the idea was cast as a tree to become was immediately at hand. But if the interview is not confused beyond recognition, her statement seems a bit misleading. Johansson writes: "The question I answered in my conversation with contemporary artist David Salle was the confrontation between political correctness and art," as if Salle had addressed the subject. But as published, this section of the interview shows how Salle tries to get Johansson to talk about the mechanics of her craft while directing the conversation directly to political correctness in the cast. Johansson was asked about her acting role models and brought the method actors of the 1950s to the point and described them as follows:

    With actors such as James Dean, Natalie Wood, and Marlon Brando, they displayed a kind of liberation, a kind of apologetic showcase of emotions. You can even see it in the lyrics of the time with playwrights like Tennessee Williams and Arthur Miller. They wrote these wonderfully dirty, complicated and ugly scenes that actors and audiences could experience. It was a time of true courage.

    "It was a time of true courage" seems to be the moment when the wheels jumped the track. Here is the full exchange on the subsequent casting, which certainly gives the impression that Johansson was the one who led the conversation:

    Do you think that fashion or generation is still important today?

    You know, acting goes through trends.

    Do we see a theatrical trend today?

    Hmm … We live in such a strange time, which in many ways has no identity. I do not know if there is a performance trend, but there are certainly trends in casting at the moment. Today, much emphasis is placed on what acting is and who we want to portray on screen. The question is, what does it matter?

    Right. Who is allowed to play which roles?

    You know, as an actor, I should be allowed to play any person, tree or animal, because that's my job and the demands of my job.

    Yes. Do you just have to represent yourself, your gender, your ethnicity, or can you actually play beyond those categories?

    Many social lines are currently being drawn and much political correctness is reflected in art.

    Are you bored? Are you annoying? Are you bucking? Are you firing? I know it's complicated, there's probably no answer.

    You know, I have a feeling that this is a trend in my business and that it has to happen for a variety of social reasons. Sometimes, however, it is unpleasant when it comes to the arts, because I think that art should be free from restrictions. What do you think about that, David? They literally create art all the time.

    "Without Identity", Johansson incidentally described her character in Ghost in the Shell . Be sure to read the entire interview, but if the context is missing, it's not clear what it might mean. Johansson made clear in her statement what she was trying to say:

    Personally, I believe that in an ideal world, every actor should be able to play everyone, and that art in every way should be immune to political correctness. That was the point I raised, though I did not come this way. I recognize that there is a widespread discrepancy in my industry that favors Caucasian, cis-gender actors, and that not every actor has the same opportunities granted to me. I support and continue to have diversity in every industry and will continue to fight for projects where everyone is involved.

    We face another round of unconvincing defenses for problematic casting, though in this case the fact that Johansson does not play a tree or a person of a different gender or ethnicity in a particular upcoming movie should make the news cycle relative keep short. That's a good thing, because when Johansson's next movie, Jojo Rabbit, comes out in October, let's talk a little bit about the casting. This is where her co-star writer, screenwriter and director Taika Waititi talks about his role in the film, an adaptation of Christine Leunens's novel Caging Skies and his general theory of occupation that is not quite as color blind as Johansson:

    Source link