قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Sports / Scherzer finishes second to Cy Young

Scherzer finishes second to Cy Young



This is not news to anyone who reads it, but still, here it is.

Max Scherzer is really a damn good pitching.

I know! A really hot take, right? He's just one of the most accomplished jugs of all time after winning three Cy Young Awards (only four pitchers won more). In 2018 he was also only the 17th thrower, who struck in a single season 300 thugs. Given the current status of Major League Baseball, with pitchers throwing fewer innings each season, it is possible that this will be the last for a while.

The National League Cy Young Awards followed in a row In a season with 300 strings, it's a halfway decent three-year track (I know I'm only going limb out here). How come that it stacks all the time?

There have been some incredible three-year peaks for pitchers in baseball history. To find people comparable to Mad Max, I wanted to focus on pitchers that have thrown in at least somewhat similar epochs. Walter Johnson or Christy Mathewson can not be found here.

The cut-off is the year 1

956, when the Cy Young Award was first introduced. It seems fitting that the first place I went to was the list of players who won the prize several times, and they make up the bulk of the list. In fact, only two of the listed players have not done so.

Where does Scherzers fall 2016-18? WAR is the simplest and easiest way to compare players who have played decades apart, so this list will be used. Keep in mind, however, that other factors can affect the perceptions of each historical pitch.

NOTE: bWAR refers to the version of the Stat of Baseball Reference. For consistency, this article does not use fWAR, the version of FanGraphs.

15. Tim Lincecum 2008-10, bWAR: 18.5

Lincecum is an impressive performer due to his strong Cy Young squadrons, although his numbers are not among the others fit legends on this list. He led the NL in outliers for the first three years, but although he played half of his games in the pitching-friendly limits of San Francisco, he never led the ERA league.

14. Nolan Ryan 1972-74, bWAR: 19.9

It's hard to believe that Nolan Ryan never won a Cy Young, but as one of the most famous dominant pitchers ever, it seemed strange to leave him from the list. This is an occasion to mention that during that time, at a time when picking was not nearly as frequent as it is today, it was an average of 360K per season.

13. Steve Carlton 1980-82, bWAR: 21.3 [1969008]

Carlton's best season came almost a decade earlier, but his best multi-year peak came in the early '80s. His success was mainly due to his longevity, as he was not nearly at the top of the ERA league. He knocked most of the punches twice and got away with two Cy Youngs in three years. His 1980 season alone is almost equivalent in WAR for his next two seasons.

12th Max Scherzer 2016-18, bWAR: 22.2

Scherzer's overall WAR score keeps him lower on this list than Nats fans had hoped, but his number is still impressive. Scherzer won Cy Young in a row and spent most of the third season as the clear favorite for another. At a time when Clayton Kershaw dominated the headlines as the best pitcher of his generation, Scherzer led the league three times in a row in both the clippings and the WHIP games, winning games for a competitive ball club. His "high" ERA is the only thing that keeps him from going up the list.

11. Jim Palmer 1975-77, bWAR: 22.5

Obviously, pitcher wins are not valued as they used to be, and that's not why Palmer was there, but he led the League each with over 20 wins on of these three seasons. The successive Cy Youngs and the unbelievable durability are characterized by the fact that in this track not many other statistics disappear from the page.

10. Clayton Kershaw 2013-15, bWAR: 23.2

Despite his postseason problems, Kershaw will almost certainly go down as the best, most experienced launcher in the last 15 years, if not longer. His & # 39; 13 – & # 39; 15 is particularly notable since he won two Cy Youngs (and could easily have had another, since he, Arrieta and Greinke both historically had large seasons that same year), his ERA twice Below 2.00, the jugs' elite club held and participated in beating more than 300 fighters in one season.

Injuries are probably the only reason he did not have multiple peaks that were even better than this one.

9. Johan Santana 2004-06, bWAR: 23.5

Santana rode in the mid-2000s to a short-lived but dominant climax. He led the league in the first three seasons, ERA twice, and won two Cy Youngs. His sums were not quite as colorful as those of others here, but in an era dominated by sluggers, he stands out as an elitist pitcher with one of the largest singles places in history.

8. Greg Maddux 1994-96, bWAR: 25.4

Maddux is considered the most successful "smart" bowler of all time. He never had the pinnacle of Clement or Feller, but the consequence struck the opponents with intelligence and precision.

It's a bit unfair as fans often overlook their ridiculous values. Maddux won four Cy Youngs in a row, two of them in this three-year summit. Although he did not beat a lot of clubs, he had an ERA of 1.56 and 1.63 in 94 and 95, and his ERA + of 271 and 260 in those years were two of the top 5 singles seasons in MLB history. In Every Era

7. Tom Seaver 1971-73, bWAR: 26.0

The Seaver Summit lasted several seasons, but its best was in the early years of the decade. He only won a Cy Young on this track, but finished in the top five every three years. He scored an average of 20 wins and led the league twice in the areas of ERA, strikeouts and WHIP.

6. Sandy Koufax 1963-65, bWAR: 26.1

Koufax won three Cy Youngs in four seasons, and we also include the year in which he also won the NL MVP (1963) , At this stage, he hit twice twice, and his highest ERA was 2.04. This is an all-time timer for a summit and that's why he's in the Hall of Fame.

5. Gaylord Perry 1972-74, bWAR: 27.2

Perry won the Cy Young in 1972, and although he did not get so close to the prize in the following two seasons, he always won another 16.4 WAR was combined in & # 39; 73 and & # 39; 74. His numbers do not jump apart, although he has won 64 games in the three years. Its high war value is the result of its consistency and consistency, which is more than just a dominance in statistics.

4. Roger Clemens 1996-98, bWAR: 27.7

It's easy to joke about steroids when it comes to Clemens, but honestly, the numbers he sets up are wild. It would have been easy picking out any number of three years, but this one is outstanding. He twice won more than 20 games, led the league twice in the ERA, led the league three times in a row and led in 1997 a WAR of 11.9. Oh, and he also won Cy Young's opponents.

3. Pedro Martinez 1998-00, bWAR: 28.8

When I sat down to compile this list, I assumed that Martinez's turn of the century would be the clear number one would. He falls to third, but do not let that take you away from his really ridiculous numbers. His 99s season is the stuff of legend, and then he went out in 2000 with 11.7 WAR.

In the middle of the steroid era, Martinez twice finished the top 5 in MVP voting. And it was not crazy. That says everything you need to know.

. 2 Randy Johnson 2000-02, bWAR: 28.9

It's fitting that Martinez and Johnson are so high on the list because they both dominated the same era of baseball and both in the MLB Hall of Fame of the MLB The same class was recorded.

Probably the most physically impressive bowler of all time, many hitter have described how really awful it was to see The Big Unit out of the box of the dough. This is particularly true for this track, where he won three of his four consecutive Cy Young Awards. He scored an average of 21.3 wins and 351 rashes per season.

Allow me to emphasize myself once more. 351 rashes. On average.

As a reminder, only 17 pitchers have ever achieved this mark, and Johnson has worked four years in a row. In retrospect, it's no wonder he landed so high on the list.

1. Bob Gibson 1968-70, bWAR: 30.5

Gibson won two Cy Youngs and one MVP on this three-year track, including 20 or more games a year, but the real story is his 1968. In this MVP This season, Gibson had an incredible era of 1.12 ERA, which represents a modern record. His astounding numbers changed the game as Major League Baseball decided to lower the hill after its dominant season. So it should come as no surprise that he is number one with one point on this list.

I have a general philosophy: If you're so incredibly dominant that the sport needs to make immediate rule changes, then you're the number one on every list.

In the end, Scherzer was only twelfth In this list, which is based on WAR, a more subjective view could easily bring him a few points. Palmer and Perry were both volume-driven, and there are very strong arguments in favor of Scherzer's summit, which is stronger than that of Kershaw, Santana and even Seaver.

Gibson, Johnson, Martinez, Clemens, Koufax and Maddux are equally unassailable owners of the biggest three-year highs in modern times, but if you like its price hardware, consistent dominance, the propensity for amazing things (such as no punches throwing and hitting 20 thugs in a single match) and historic strike combine Overall, Scherzers season 2016/18 has an argument for seventh to twelfth place in the last 70 years of Major League Baseball.

It was an incredible run, and probably none compared to another DC athlete (not called Ovi). It's one of the most impressive peaks ever, and fans in the country's capital are lucky enough to see such a master as work every five days.


Source link