قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / SCOTUS could lay his hand on Roe v Wade by accepting an abortion case from Indiana

SCOTUS could lay his hand on Roe v Wade by accepting an abortion case from Indiana



WASHINGTON – JANUARY 22: Proponents of Pro Choice participate in protests outside the US Supreme Court building on January 22, 2010 in Washington, DC. Activists from across the nation gathered to commemorate the 37th anniversary of the Supreme Court ruling against Wade, which decriminalized abortion in all fifty states. (Photo by Mark Wilson / Getty Images)

Mark Wilson | Getty Images

The Supreme Court could signal on Tuesday that it is ready to take the groundbreaking pro-choice Roe v. Reconsider Wade again.

Conservative legislators in states such as Georgia and Alabama have fiercely fought over the last few weeks to impose restrictions on abortion laws in the hope of testing the 1

973 decision, which stated that women have a qualifying right to end their pregnancy.

Much of these laws were propelled by the ratification of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, the second candidate of President Donald Trump, in October. The addition of the judge gave the court a reliable conservative majority.

It is unlikely that the new laws will soon bring it to the Supreme Court. It could take two or three years for litigation to be heard by the lower courts.

Two laws limiting abortion were passed in Indiana in 2016 and signed by the then government. Mike Pence, now the Vice President, is ready for review. The judges met in a private conference on Thursday to vote on whether they should be heard. An announcement is expected on Tuesday. Four votes are required for the court to decide a case.

Under one of the laws of Indiana, abortions are prevented for reasons that are considered "discriminatory" – for example, due to the expected race or disability of the fetus. The other procedure requires ultrasound at least 18 hours before an abortion.

Both laws were blocked by the lower courts before their entry into force. Experts, however, believe that the Supreme Court is likely to comply with only the most restrictive abortion laws, if that is the case decides to officially review them.

"You have three pretty solid voices to sustain most of it, a very likely vote, Kavanaugh, and the Supreme Judge, [but] he could be taken off now and then," said Brian Fitzpatrick, a former Justice employee Antonin Scalia, who teaches law at Vanderbilt University. "I would put my bets on maintaining most of these laws."

While the five Conservative judges could avoid a complete overthrow of Roe or a subsequent decision that limited him, the inclusion of one of the laws of Indiana would signal that the court intended to form a hamstring several years of protective action. In Planned Parenthood v. Chr. Casey judged the court that laws that impose an "inappropriate burden" on women seeking abortions are inadmissible.

The possibility that Roe may be weakened but not eliminated is more alarming for some reproductive groups than for their direct reversal. These groups fear that adhering to restrictive abortion laws could have just as much practical impact without triggering the same political resistance as the direct takeover of Roe.

"We do not need an inversion of Roe v. Wade for states to close their last clinic and a large number of people have the right to abortion," said an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer

Another abortion law, which the judges are likely to review soon, was passed in Louisiana. In February, the judges voted 5: 4 for the temporary suspension of the law requiring that abortion doctors in the state require admission to a nearby hospital. The measure is almost identical to a Texas law passed by the court in 2016.

The decision of the court of February has led to intrigues. In 2016, Chief Justice John Roberts and the Conservatives rejected the court's decision to remove the Texas version of the law. In February, however, he joined the liberal wing of the court to block him and wondered which side he would stand on when the case returns to trial for full hearing next year.

Louisiana asked for court approval earlier this month Listen to the case, although this petition was not voted on Thursday.

If the court takes up the abortion cases in Indiana or Louisiana, they are likely to be heard during the term of office, which begins in October. A decision is expected to be taken in June 2020 – a fight for abortion will take place just months before the Americans vote in the presidential election.


Source link