قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Skeptics call on Matt Bevin of Kentucky to provide proof of electoral fraud Allegations: NPR

Skeptics call on Matt Bevin of Kentucky to provide proof of electoral fraud Allegations: NPR



President Trump smiles behind the Governor of Kentucky, Matt Bevin, during a rally at Rupp Arena in Lexington, Kentucky, on 4 November. Both Trump and Bevin have made unfounded allegations about electoral fraud.

Almond Ngan / AFP via Getty Images


Hide caption

Caption switch

Almond Ngan / AFP via Getty Images

President Trump smiles behind the Governor of Kentucky, Matt Bevin, during a rally at Rupp Arena in Lexington, Kentucky, on 4 November. Both Trump and Bevin have made unfounded allegations about electoral fraud.

Almond Ngan / AFP on Getty Images

The acting governor, Matt Bevin, decided last week to question the legitimacy of the elections.

"What we do know is that they really do have a number of significant irregularities," Bevin said Wednesday in front of the governor's mansion, "the details of which we are currently soliciting [1959048] and other information to help us will gain a better understanding of what has been done or it has not happened. "

Bevin declined to answer questions from reporters or provide details, except that" we know that thousands of Postal ballot papers were counted illegally ".

No election official in Kentucky, including Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes, has confirmed this claim in the days since Bevin's founding.

Critics and election specialists urge Bevin to submit or revoke evidence for the drama.

"Gov. Bevin really needs to give up or shut up, give us the evidence, or stop making these allegations of electoral fraud for which there is no evidence," said Josh Douglas, professor of suffrage at the university the University of Kentucky.

"I think it is a threat to the legitimacy of a democratic institution."

Next steps in Kentucky

Kentucky will revise votes in elections on the request of Bevin November 14.

This process is different from a recount; Instead of re-counting each of the ballots, the officials re-print the vouchers from the voting machines and check them. It is more of a clerical process and not uncommon. Douglas says it would be "extremely shocking" if it changed the underlying outcome.

Unless the reinterpretation provides substantive evidence that Democrat Attorney General Andy Beshear has not won, Bevin's options are slim.

Bevin has the power under state law to contest the election, which would cause the ball to enter the legislature's court. The Republican supremacy in the legislature could then use a committee to investigate evidence and determine a result.

External experts hope that this does not happen.

"This is a terrible idea," says Lonna Atkeson Director of the Center for Voting, Elections and Democracy at the University of New Mexico.

"And I can not imagine that the legislature would actually continue with such a company without having any serious information pointing to fraud or any other kind of abuse or serious election irregularities."

The window can close; Republican Senate President Robert Stivers said in an interview on Friday that Bevin should admit that next week's renewed campaign will not radically change election results.

"It is time to stop and go home, to say that he had a good four years, and congratulate Governor Beshear," Stivers said in an interview with Louisville's The Courier Journal.

Losers Have Doubt

Bevin is not the first politician to question the results of a race, and occasionally, though rarely, these concerns have been substantiated in reality.

Florida Governor Rick Scott hinted at "rampant electoral fraud," which was never confirmed in his Senate race.

Democrats have continued to blame election results in Georgia for election administration issues that they claim have suppressed turnout.

In North Carolina, the election for a seat in the House of Representatives was annulled due to a postal vote scheme.

Even after winning the elections in 2016, President Trump claimed that "millions upon millions of people" voted illegally in the 2016 elections, which is why he lost the national referendum on Hillary Clinton.

Trump has never provided evidence for this allegation, and a group that assembled its government to investigate electoral fraud dissolved less than a year after its foundation, without any significant result being achieved.

Overall, there were few signs of widespread electoral fraud.

However, Americans' confidence in the election has slowly diminished in the last 20 years – and Democracy observers are partly blaming political rhetoric.

Douglas of the University of Kentucky says the state's response to Bevin's claims will tell a lot about how the country could respond to similar allegations at the next election cycle.

"Say that Donald Trump is shown to have lost the 2020 election, will he face defeat, or will he assert massive electoral fraud?" Asked Douglas, "and how will our democratic institutions respond? I think the situation in Kentucky this year could say a lot about whether our institutions are able to beat such demands. "


Source link