قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Some questions for Cuomo after the debate on Wednesday: Gothamist

Some questions for Cuomo after the debate on Wednesday: Gothamist



  83018cuomo.jpg
Governor Cuomo at the Wednesday Cynthia Nixon debate (Craig Ruttle / POOL / EPA-EFE / Shutterstock)

Cynthia Nixon and Governor Andrew Cuomo struck for 60 minutes on Wednesday night and the Results did not disappoint! Well, maybe it was a little disappointing that so much time was spent in the single debate of the Democratic Gubernatorial Primary School on the issues of renaming the bridge and teaching children about the marijuana threat, but the Responses of the candidates gave on traffic, on health, on corporate personality and Shakespeare and helicopter – were a little enlightening!

The debate also sparked some follow-up questions for Cuomo, who has been governor for nearly eight years, and opened the debate on his "real" management experiences (but that was pr according to him as a tribute to Senator John McCain, "the flags in the state from New York will be on half staff, regardless of what Washington is doing. "We asked the governor's campaign to answer these questions, and will update the post when they answer" Know me by my enemies, "Cuomo said last night.

Cuomos Trumpian Subway Denials

For over a year – since about the time when the deterioration of the subway began to hurt its downstate poll numbers – Cuomo has a host of Arguments offered to obscure the public's understanding of who controls the subways.Therefore, it was hardly surprising on Wednesday evening when the governor asked whether the state was the K east of a planned fare increase, again trying to distance itself from the ailing transport system.

Following the first mention of his government's investment in airports and commuter rail, the governor claimed that the subway system was the city's responsibility. "New York City has always funded it twice as much as the state," he continued. "The state has now financed it four times as much as the city."

Both allegations – about property rights and current financing – are wrong, according to transit advocates and experts. "It's categorically untrue, and I have no idea where he got it from," said Richard Ravitch, a former vice-governor and MTA chairman credited with rescuing the subway system in the 1980s. He noted that responsibility for the MTA's decision lies with its board, for which Cuomo selects both the chairman and a majority of board members, adding that it is always "in abundance" that public power is the area of the state. "To say that the funding should come from the city budget is simply not a constructive proposal," said an angry Ravitch.

Constructive or not, the Governor's insistence that the city does not pay its fair share has already led to a lengthy battle for emergency repair and could greatly delay Andy Byford's widely supported Fast Forward Plan. It is also a substantially meaningless distinction to the subway-dependent New Yorkers who form the income base of the ailing system. According to City Comptroller Scott Stringer, nearly 70 percent of the agency's operating budget comes from city residents and businesses through a mix of fare increases and tolls, as well as other taxes that may be flowing through the state's budget. In fact, people who pay for and rely on ever-deteriorating subway services will continue to be misled about funding that system by the one person who, as well as anyone else, agrees to charge for the subway is. Why is Governor Cuomo doing this?

(Later in the evening, Cuomo suggested that the subway service decline steadily even before he took office, which is also wrong.)

Veto, which the IDC in the Bud could have pinched

During one of their many quarrels, Nixon asked the governor, "Have you allowed Republicans to glorify their own districts?"

"No, no," Cuomo replied.

Nixon probably referred to the US Senate resettlement card of 2011, which, according to a recent analysis, cost Democrats six seats in the Senate. Michael Li, chief adviser to the Brennan Center's Democracy Program, described the card as "one of the decade's most biased legislative plans, that's not a question."

"Basically, the districts in the backcountry are a little underpopulated, the districts in the city are very densely populated, then the color communities are pretty aggressively divided, and if you do that, you get a map where these Republicans get several extra seats "Li said, adding," If you had a clearer card, the IDC would be irrelevant. "

Governor Cuomo could have vetoed the card, but he did not argue that his other legislative priorities suffered and that a constitutional amendment was needed to reform the whole process for 2021.

Blair Horner The Executive Director of the New York Public Interest Research Group called this change "flawed" and said it would "do nothing" to prevent legislators from manipulating their districts.

"Of course the governor has no unilateral power and the assembly approved the card," Horner said. "But the question for him is, why did not you refuse it? The Republicans did not have a two-thirds majority in the Senate in 2012 [to override a veto] it's quite possible that the veto would have been maintained."

The one "gigantic" thing the governor could do now to fight corruption

Asked for the conviction of his top adviser Joe Percoco, who bribes companies with businesses in front of the state Governor Cuomo replied that it was a "painful situation" and ticked off his platform to clean up Albany. "No external income period, full financial disclosure, campaign financial reform," Cuomo said. "Because we have to take the money out of politics."

It's not impossible to take corporate money completely out of politics without a Supreme Court ruling, but John Kaehny, managing director of good-governance Reinvent Albany, says the governor can take a "big and radical move". make address status corruption.

"One of the biggest corruption risks we see is the fact that people who want to do business with the state of New York are allowed to make campaign contributions to state politicians," Kaehny said. "Many, many of the governor's biggest contributors are doing business or trying to do business with the state of New York, and one thing the governor could do is say I will not take those donations."

Why? Does the governor take this money on? Kaehny acknowledges that Cuomo could argue that this is a form of "one-sided disarmament," but the refusal is "a gigantic thing."

"In truth, the governor reluctantly or not at all tried to reduce the influence of money in politics, and in some cases he is actively unproductive," adds Kaehny, noting that Cuomo's first budget is the power of the prosecutor, CUNY and SUNY contracts to prefabricate the same type of contracts that Alain Kaloyeros, Cuomos right-hand-man for the Buffalo Billion initiative, has recently blamed for rigging

Instead of bowing to legislation to restore that supervisor, Cuomo prefers the creation of Inspectorates to oversee the institutions.

"If the governor was serious about cleaning Albany, he would support and not oppose [the legislation]so why not?" Says Kaehny.

Blair Horner, Managing Director of NYPIRG, said he was surprised that the issue of corruption in the debate had so little airtime.

"The public sees New York as this progressive state, and there are certainly examples of it," said Horner, who cites the state education system and its legal responsibility to take care of the homeless. "But it's a backward democracy, as found in America, so so few people choose."

Horner continued, "You put an accountant in jail, and yes, as the governor said, he took him there, but you had a governor who had to resign, another governor who was punished for oath pays two top advisers to this governor were convicted of corruption, God knows how many legislators and leaders of both houses, and they do nothing! It's amazing to me. "

And yet a smaller but also significant thing Cuomo Could Counter Corruption

Speaking to his former top adviser Joe Percoco, Cuomo emphasized that he has "zero tolerance" for any kind of corruption in public. So why even claim the appearance of a conflict of interest by holding Joe Lhota as chair of the MTA? In May, the Times reported that Lhota, in addition to full-time employment in the Transit Authority, operates on eight slates in Manhattan and Long Island, including a lucrative paid position at Madison Square Garden, in addition to the Chief of Staff at NYU Langone Health. Lhota's ranting earned him a $ 2.5 million private income in 2017 – nearly $ 1 million more than he did when he was not responsible for the MTA.

"The governor is basically rubbing a massive conflict of interest in the public face and he makes a joke about state ethics laws, and he shows that the state ethics committee is a total farce," says Kaehny, showing many, many relationships on MSGs comprehensive dealing with the state with the MTA, "and NYU Langones."

"It's grotesque," adds Kaehny.

The main election is Thursday, September 13th.


Source link