SpaceX increasing rocket production and rehabilitation will require new equipment, which can be difficult for any business, but it is a particularly difficult problem when dealing with huge missiles for interplanetary missions with large payload fairings as SpaceX's upcoming BFR (Big Falcon Rocket) wants to build its next missile facility, and certain members of Congress may not be pleased with this selection.
A new document from the Port of Los Angeles summarizes an environmental study conducted on behalf of a proposed customer and a SpaceX subunit subsidiary WW Marine Composites, reports Ars Technica. WWMC is attempting to use 240 land adjacent to Berth to design, develop and manufacture "prototypes and models of the first generation of specialized commercial transport vessels." All vehicles are prescribed as water transport vehicles because of their size, and the site would also support the recovery operations of Space Exploration Technologies – an obvious indication of the SpaceX drone vessels and their first stage booster recovery.
SpaceX's commercial space program and collaboration with NASA were at the mutual benefit of both organizations, but not everyone in Congress seems to see things this way. Congressman Mo Brooks has presented a new bill in Congress, the ALSTAR (American Leadership in Space Technology and Advanced Rocketry) law. The bill would state that Alabama's Marshall Space Flight Center is "NASA's leading rocket engine center, making it essential to maintain and promote US leadership in rocket propulsion and the development of the next generation of rocket propulsion capabilities."
There is no evidence that the two events are directly interrelated, they speak of continued tension between US commercial and government-funded spaceflights, and provide insight into why NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) is a major asset ) is not on schedule and well above budget. When Congress withdrew funds for the SLS, it determined which technologies, facilities and contractors were expected by NASA. This is far from beneficial for NASA, whose hands are tied in many details, including mandates that they continue to develop their spacecraft rockets and technology first developed in the 1970s. Brooks has also spoken out against SpaceX and has lately (and in total violation of the facts) pointed out that SpaceX would fly its demo mission for the manned Dragon capsule without life support.
While such problems do not explain all the problems with NASA and its manned space program, one reason why the space agency hampers is because some members of the congress treat it as a job program, some want to completely defuse it, and some indeed, it has to explore the cosmos. When SpaceX starts hitting more aggressive commercial targets and sets up a BFR years ahead of NASA, you expect these tensions to deepen.