قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / Spakovsky and Phillips: The federal court's bizarre ruling stops Indiana's efforts to cleanse the electoral roll

Spakovsky and Phillips: The federal court's bizarre ruling stops Indiana's efforts to cleanse the electoral roll



With presidential elections in 2020, less than a year away, American voters' registers are unfortunately no longer in shape. However, well-funded liberal organizations work to ensure that states do not clean their rolls. Her last victim is Indiana. A federal district court has temporarily suspended the state's efforts to compare its electoral rolls with those of other states in order to avoid double registrations as to why a voter may need to be registered in more than one state. For example: "Someone could move from Indiana to Kansas to accept a new job and immediately register on arrival in Kansas to vote in Kansas. But if her personal circumstances change before election day ̵

1; she misses a trial at the workplace, a family member gets sick, a better opportunity arises in Indiana – the person might decide to return to her former home in Indiana. "

But do not worry, said Judge Diane Wood, the Clinton commissioner who drafted the opinion. Those voters who are registered in more than one state "will only vote in one place, even if they have two open registrations." For real?

ADRIANA COHEN: A DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT WOULD MAKE GREAT CHANGES TO YOUR LIFE – FOR THE POOR

There are many cases of double voices in the Heritage Foundation's election fraud database. Some are more pedestrians, such as John Marotta, who was sentenced in 2011 for voting in Arizona and Colorado. Others, like Wendy Rosen, are a bit more colorful. As a Democratic congressional candidate in Maryland, Rosen was expelled from the 2012 race (and later found guilty of electoral fraud) after she was found to have illegally voted in several elections in Maryland and Florida.

More from Opinion [19659007] Or how about the very ambitious Pasco Parker, who was convicted in 2015 of illegal elections in Tennessee, Florida and North Carolina in the 2012 general election. He obviously wanted to make sure that he cast as many votes as possible for his favorite presidential candidate.

The Government Accountability Institute (GAI) examined electoral rolls in 21 states after the 2016 elections. Nearly 8,500 people were found who appeared to have illegally voted in several states. "The expansion of GAI's Conservative Matching Method to all 50 states," the report said, "would indicate an expected minimum of 45,000 duplicate high-trust matches." Recognize when a court restricts the possibilities of a state, if duplicate registrations are proven.

If you recently moved and forgot to tell the country you lived in to cancel your voter registration, you are not alone. A 2012 report released by the Pew Research Center found that "[a] approximately 2.75 million people are registered in more than one state." Judge Samuel Alito referred to the same study last year, in which he maintained the electoral roll Ohio advocates, "It's estimated that 24 million voter registrations in the US – about one in eight – are invalid or significantly inaccurate.

Such registry errors are not harmless, even if they occur unintentionally. They mean more work for already-pressurized election officials and taxpayers' money wasted on unnecessary election-related mailings. Duplicate registrations can lead to longer waiting times at polling stations as election officials search bloated lists of registrants.

Duplicate registrations also create a fertile ground for double voices – which is impossible to detect when a court restricts what a state can do with evidence of duplicate registrations.

CLICK HERE TO OBTAIN THE OPINION NEWSLETTER

To address this serious problem, Indiana participates in the Interstate Cross Check Program, whose member states compare voter lists to individuals registered in several states Find . In 2017 and 2018, Indiana passed a law that allowed the cancellation of registrations when the state confirmed by a number of factors that the same person was registered in more than one state.

and the League of Women Voters – organizations that have consistently argued against improving election integrity – to end the program.

The Constitution gives States primary responsibility for conducting elections that are subject to certain limited powers of the Federal Government. In 1993, Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act to establish guidelines for voter registration and list maintenance efforts to improve the accuracy of voter lists. In Indiana, they managed to get the court to misinterpret the simple language of the crime. The Court ruled that, despite the fact that you declare in writing that you are now resident and therefore entitled to vote in this State, registering to vote in another State does not amount to a written confirmation that the Registrant has moved. [19659003] By the beginning of 2020, we can expect more attacks on election integrity from the usual suspects. As attacks increase and courts hold false views, confidence in our elections fades. It is time to support states that are trying to improve the security of their electoral process.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE BY HANS VON SPAKOVSY

Kaylan Phillips is the Attorney General of the Public Interest Legal Foundation, a law firm of 501 (c) (3) public interest, dedicated to election integrity.


Source link