قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Health / Stanford Health Care receives poor safety rating from Watchdog

Stanford Health Care receives poor safety rating from Watchdog



A hospital guard has given Stanford Health Care the lowest rating for patient safety in the past three years, according to the ranking published on Tuesday.

The Leapfrog Group, a national organization committed to hospital transparency, gave Stanford a "C" rating of about 2,500 general acute care hospitals across the nation this week. Leapfrog awards assessments to these hospitals twice a year; Stanford received "B" in 2017 and the last six months of 2015 and 2016, and an "A" in the first six months of 2015 and 2016.

Stanford underperformed in gradings in Leapfrog's Spring 2018 Spring Issue in 15 out of 27 security criteria that mostly affect hospital infections, surgery complications and safety issues. By contrast, Stanford staff, doctors and nurses received good grades, and in most cases the hospital was good at avoiding mistakes. The full score can be found at https://bit.ly/2Hqenfr.

Ann Weinacker, Interim's Chief Quality Officer at Stanford, said Leapfrog Rating does not give an accurate picture of the recent progress the hospital has been addressing to patients' safety because of the data up to three years outdated.

"The main problem we have with Leapfrog is that the reported data is really quite old," said Weinacker. "We looked at much more real-time data on these issues … While the Leapfrog report is an indicator that lingers, ratings based on newer performance reflect the gains made by Stanford Health Care's new initiatives." [1

9659002] Leapfrog's website says the organization searches the data from Medicare & Medicaid Services, Leapfrog Hospital Survey, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the annual survey of the American Hospital Association.

Weinacker added that US News and World Report uses similar data and, more recently, Stanford ranked ninth in the nation and region best for patient safety. She said an initiative to improve the hospital between Stanford Health Care and the University's School of Medicine found that only one colon surgical infection was acquired in the hospital between November 2017 and February. An ICU for cardiac patients was recently without a hospital-acquired bloodstream infection for 30 days, said Weinacker.

"We look at every infection acquired in the hospital, look at each decubitus and try to understand how it happened. Is there anything in our system that caused it, and how can we protect the next patient from it "That contract?" she said, adding that many patients are treated in more complex situations than in a general acute care unit. 19659002] The ratings come at a time when SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, a healthcare union, is qualifying for the November election in Palo Alto, Redwood City and three other Bay Area cities where Stanford has medical facilities want. The measures would prohibit hospitals and other medical facilities from charging patients more than 15 percent of the actual cost of care. If adopted by the voters, the measures would come into force on 1 January. Violations would have to grant rebates or reduce bills to patients if they charge higher than acceptable fees.

The union said last year that state statistics showed that patients dying from intestinal bacteria during hospital stays contracted more than doubled in a three-year span, from 12 in 2011 to 26 in 2014.

Leapfrog gave "A" ratings to Sequoia Hospital at Redwood City and Kaiser Permanente Redwood City Medical Center. El Camino Hospital at Mountain View received a "C". No Bay Area Hospital received a "F."


Source link