قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Science / "Surviving the Foulest": Finally a scientific reason to stay on the couch

"Surviving the Foulest": Finally a scientific reason to stay on the couch



Nobody wonders if it's good to leave the couch to walk or run – raising your heart rate, burning calories and maybe even bringing a few years into your life.

But keep in mind that all this exercise may be a selfish act – a shortsighted chess game in an evolutionary chess game that has been going on for eons of time. And if you have not stepped off the sofa, you may have taken the first step to saving the species.

Finally, there is a study that, if properly read, can convey the belief in wasting a Sunday (or Monday) or Tuesday) afternoon. Think of it as a not entirely airtight refutation from the American Heart Association, the NFL, to Michelle Obama and the gentle but judgmental reminder of your watch that you've made only nine steps in the last hour.

There is evidence in the form of a scholarly work whose authors are now writing an angry e-mail to the Washington Post. An article in the Journal of Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences found evidence this month that species that consume less energy on average have a better chance of making another rotation around the circle of life.

CrossFit-averse people everywhere can thank Luke Strotz, a postdoctoral fellow at Kansas University's Institute for Biodiversity, who has spent years studying the fossils of mollusks and shells. His most recent study shows that there is a significant correlation between low basal metabolic rate (that is, the amount of energy an organism exerts peacefully) and the evolutionary endurance of a species. The newspaper, he told the Washington Post, gives us more insight into what causes species to die out.

"It's not an all and an end of extinction, that's not the case," Strotz told the Lawrence, Kan., Journal World. "But what this study shows for the first time is that metabolism and physiology are a component of extinction, and nobody has done that before ̵

1; no one has shown that before."

His co-author, Bruce Lieberman, an ecology and biology professor, called it "survival of sloth."

"Perhaps the long term is the best evolutionary strategy for animals to be cumbersome and sluggish – the lower the metabolic rate, the more likely it will become the species to which you belong survives. Lieberman said, "Instead of the" survival of the fittest, "perhaps a better metaphor for the story of life is" survival of the laziest, "or at least" the survival of the dreaming. "

The researchers studied the fossils of shells and snails in the Atlantic Ocean The animals in the study have shells that have a better chance of surviving the passage of time, and they have been rigorously studied and cataloged by scientists across North America

Strotz and his colleagues compile a database of approximately 46,000 copies of nearly 300 species and found that higher basal metabolic rates were "a reliable predictor of the likelihood of extinction."

The reasons remain a mystery He hypothesized that high metabolic rates, because they had a high mortality rate – and they had to grow up fast and reproduce young before they died from predation – were what Strotz called the theory, "Live fast, die young." He said More research is needed, even on other species.

But there are benefits to Strotz & # 39 Study that goes beyond the desire to never know what exactly a burpee is. Strotz says his research – and similar studies – can help conservationists understand which animals are most likely to die out due to climate change.

"This could be the canary in the coal mine for us," he told the post. "We can say that this thing is more prone to extinction … we can do our conservation efforts here."

There are, of course, some reservations that one should know before relying on a lifelong sloth for a tangentially applicable scientific study. Full transparency: mussels and gastropods are not human. They are invertebrates that live mainly in the ocean, and in another part of the wildlife. Besides, Netflix never asked a mollusk: "Are you still looking?"

And there are other variables in the extinction equation that can also be affected by pitch (see: giant comets, habitat loss, plague). 19659002] Strotz also said he talks about the average metabolism of a species, not an individual.

"We're talking about a species level, not an individual level, I had to tell a lot of people that I could not be a champion of the couch potato."

In the last few days he has articles about his work on the Seen all over the world, along with images of slippery stereotypes like Homer Simpson and "The Dude" from "The Big" Lebowski. "It was not exactly what he was planning as he spent months measuring thousands of mollusks and shells and thinking about extinction.

But despite his studies, the first to appear when someone googles" rotten mollusk ", says Strotz, he is happy that he was able to get a lot of sedentary people who are busy with the bigger questions about existence on Earth.

"Paleontology goes far beyond that, here is the newest, biggest dinosaur, "he said," we're starting to answer the big questions about the secrets of life. "


Source link