Earlier this week, a member of the Texas legislature introduced a bill that makes it a crime for a telecommunications company, such as Verizon or AT & T, to throttle Internet services in declared disaster areas, KUT News said.
This bill in Texas, HB 1426, does not specify the rules for net neutrality. The ban on network operators is only prohibited to restrict Internet access in disaster areas. Behavior like throttling in other scenarios is not prohibited.
Over 100 more net neutrality legislative proposals were introduced at the state level after the Federal Communications Commission reversed its safeguards in 201
"The fact that this is now bubbling up at the state level is a good sign," said Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future. "But in reality, we need the FCC to really get their work done and ensure that these companies do not act in ways that endanger the public."
Last week, the US Court of Appeals for Washington heard arguments from both The FCC and several petitioners alleged that the agency's abolition of network neutrality rules was unlawful in several respects. Some were more persuasive than others, the judge seemed. The public safety argument that goes in the same direction as this law in Texas, however, seemed the most important.
One petitioner argued that because of the suspension of the FCC, Verizon could legally lower the speed of the devices by the Santa Clara State Fire Department in California, making it more difficult for firefighters to provide emergency services. As a result of the suspension, the FCC would not have the authority to follow Verizon.