قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / The agency defends officers who used a stun gun on a handcuff man

The agency defends officers who used a stun gun on a handcuff man



GLENDALE, Arizona (AP) – Police officers at Phoenix Station defend their officials who were captured on a camera camera video, repeatedly calling a handcuffed man with a stun gun during a meeting on a police station Motel parking lot shot A complaint from the meeting in July 2017 alleged that a Glendale officer had kicked Johnny Wheatcroft in the groin during a fight while another officer had shot him in the testicles with the stun gun.

The Glendale police held a briefing on Monday to answer the excesses Force allegations after a video of the encounter surfaced on local television.

The police department acknowledged that their officers used stun guns on Wheatcroft and that an officer kicked him during a fight.

But the authorities denied the allegation that officer Matt Schneider shot the stun gun at Wheatcroft and instead said that officer Wheatcroft was wriggling in the thigh.

The Police Department refused to answer several Questi's

The agency said Wheatcroft did not follow the officers' instructions, and Wheatcroft's wife beat a policeman with a plastic bag full of soda cans in her head and pushed the policeman to the ground.

During the Briefing With reporters, spokesmen for the police department refused to answer a few questions, such as whether it was part of the agency's policy to use a stun gun on a person who was handcuffed.

Police say Wheatcroft and his family are passengers in a car that was suspected of traffic violation.

Agency spokesman Sgt. John Roth said the kick against Wheatcroft is permissible with regard to individuals defending themselves against officers.

Almost the entire deployment of Schneider stun guns was also allowed, though the officer was banned from using a stun gun for three days on Wheatcroft at a time when he was tied up and did not fend off officers, Roth said.

Marc Victor, a lawyer representing Wheatcroft and his family in the lawsuit, said at a press conference that the video was docile to Wheatcroft throughout the encounter. "That's outrageous," said Victor. "That's obvious."

The videos show officers asking for identification of passengers in the car.

When Wheatcroft asked why the officers needed IDs, Schneider canceled the possibility of bringing Wheatcroft to the police station. The officer also said he saw Wheatcroft stuffing something into a backpack and into the car seats.

An officer said Wheatcroft was going to fight. "I'm not doing anything, brother," Wheatcroft replied.

Finally, an officer put his stun guns on Wheatcroft's shoulder as he tried to make Wheatcroft lower his head. Another officer then used his stun gun on Wheatcroft. His wife and two children roared as they asked the officers to stop.

While Wheatcroft was sitting on the tarmac leaning against the car, Schneider fired his stun gun at Wheatcroft's chest. The police department said the chest was struck with the stun gun after the woman attacked the officer.

"Do you want it again? Shut your mouth!

The lawsuit read that Wheatcroft was screaming in pain as the police removed the tusks of stun guns from his skin and forced Schneider to place his stun guns on Wheatcroft's penis.

The suit quotes Schneider: "Keep fighting and you'll get it again! Want it again? Shut up!" Schneider told Wheatcroft he had finished everything.

Roth said that Schneider did not shoot an anesthetic cannon on Wheatcroft's testicles and instead hit him on the thigh while the officer pulled on Wheatcroft's shorts during a fight

The police said there was no evidence that Schneider had Wheatcroft's penis in one Stun gun provided.

The lawsuit states that Wheatcroft, his wife and their two children were traumatized by the encounter. They demand from Glendale an unspecified amount of money.

Wheatcroft was charged with grievous bodily harm and resisted arrest, but was later dismissed at the prosecutor's request.

The police department said the prosecutor's office had examined the case and rejected the officers.


Source link