قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / The botched Kavanaugh story of the New York Times is the latest in a series of errors from the Opinion section

The botched Kavanaugh story of the New York Times is the latest in a series of errors from the Opinion section



It was the latest in a series of sensational mistakes that embarrassed James Bennet since he was named publisher of The Times & Opinion in 2016, and has been the subject of controversy, criticism, and at least one lawsuit.

A Times spokesman declined to provide Bennet for an interview for this story, but defended the section "Opinion" by referring to his talented authors and the good work they have done in Making Life Difference People, ranging from the groundbreaking ongoing privacy project, to an editorial series on laws that value a fetus beyond the mother's life, to an article by Alysia Montaño in front of the camera that led to a number of companies changing their lives Contracts with women athletes to protect women during and after pregnancy, "the Times spokesman said in a statement to CNN Business." The variety and quality of this work is appreciated not only by readers but also by peers. "

But while the opinion has undoubtedly produced a great deal of work in the years since Bennet's inauguration, it has been Also responsible for some of the biggest black-eye journalists at The Times at this time.

The latter happened again over the weekend when The Times & # 39; Sunday Review, which falls under Opinion, published an essay based on an upcoming book written by two Times reporters and a previously unreported claim describing sexual misconduct against Kavanaugh, which he denied.

The claim in the book depended on the memory of a classmate from Yale who told The Times that he contacted the FBI and lawmakers during Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing. Yale's classmate, who is now a prominent lawyer, has refused to publicly comment, according to The Times.

The book "The Education of Brett Kavanaugh," however, contained an important detail missing from the essay published by the Times: The Focus on the Woman, who had been a student at the time of the incident. declined to be interviewed. In addition, her friends said she had not remembered the incident.

In addition to this omission of vital information, The Times & # 39; Opinion Desk also came under fire for a tweet that had been published to promote the story. The tweet said that "a jab at a party in a drunken dorm can seem like harmless fun."

On Sunday night, the Times had not only apologized for the "offensive" tweet but also attached a note from the editor to the essay, which was about the blatant omission in its original story.

"The book reports that the student declined to be interviewed, and friends say she does not remember the incident," the publisher's note says. "This information has been added to the article."

The weekend flub was one of a series of botched stories.

  How an Antisemitic Cartoon Ended in the New York Times
In 2017, the Opinion Section published an editorial that linked Arlington with a political plot Action Committee and a shootout in Tucson, Arizona in 2011 that killed six people and badly wounded Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. In fact, there is no indication that the shooter saw the advertisement, much less that he was motivated by it. The Times issued a correction, but Palin filed a lawsuit against the newspaper. Palin's lawsuit was initially dismissed, but revoked in August by a court of appeal.
In April of this year, the Opinion section of the international edition of the Times published an anti-Semitic caricature. The Opinion Department apologized and the Times editor, A.G. Sulzberger said the newspaper took "disciplinary" action in relation to the publisher involved.
And lately the Times has been abused by criticism and ridicule about the actions of columnist Bret Stephens. After being jokingly referred to as a "bug" by a George Washington University professor on Twitter, Stephens sent an e-mail to the professor and his examiner to complain. Stephens later wrote a settlement program, which was referred to as a bed bug for the dehumanizing Jewish people, the Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich faced. The poll asked if readers found the testimony of Christine Blasey Ford, who accused Kavanaugh of sexual assault, to be "credible." The Times later put it out and said it was "insensitive to the severity of hearing".


Source link