قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / Business / The California judge decides that coffee requires cancer warnings

The California judge decides that coffee requires cancer warnings



Posted: March 30, 2018 8:00 AM Updated: March 30, 2008 1:48 PM

LOS ANGELES (AP) – Coffee sellers must publish ominous warnings in California, as each cup contains a chemical (19659003) The culprit is a byproduct of the bean-roasting process, which is a known carcinogen and was the focus of an eight-year legal battle between a tiny nonprofit group and Big Coffee [19659003] The Toxika Education and Research Council wanted the coffee industry to remove acrylamide from its processing – as the potato chip makers did when she sued them years ago – or disclose the potential risk in signs or labels. The industry, led by Starbucks Corp., said that the level of the chemical in coffee is not detrimental and risks are overcompensated by benefits.

Judge Elihu Berle, judge at the Los Angeles Superior Court, said Wednesday that the coffee machines are not the (1

9659003) "While the plaintiff has submitted evidence that the consumption of coffee carries the risk of harm to the fetus, of infants, children and adults, the defendants' medical and epidemiology experts testified that they had no opinion on causation, "Berle wrote in his proposal. "The defendants failed to fulfill their burden of proof … that the consumption of coffee is an asset to human health."

The lawsuit was filed against Starbucks and against 90 companies under a law passed in 1986 by California voters who criticized cancer-causing chemicals from countless products and to lead to rapid settlement shakedowns.

The Safe Drinking Water and Poison Enforcement Act, better known as Proposition 65, requires warning labels for about 900 chemicals known to cause cancer or birth defects. It allows individuals, lawyers and lawyers to sue on behalf of the state and to collect part of the civil penalties for not issuing the warning.

"This lawsuit has mocked Prophet 65, confused consumers, and does nothing to improve public health," said William Murray, president and CEO of the National Coffee Association, adding that coffee was a healthy drink.

Scientific evidence of coffee has been paced for a long time Recently concerns over possible dangers of coffee have eased, and some studies have found health benefits.

In 2016, the World Health Organization's cancer agency excluded coffee from its "possible carcinogen list".

Studies show that coffee is unlikely to cause breast cancer, prostate or pancreatic cancer, and it appears to lower the risks of liver and uterine cancer, the agency said. Evidence is not enough to determine its effect on dozens of other cancers.

Coffee companies have said that it is not possible to remove acrylamide from their product without ruining the taste.

But lawyer Raphael Metzger, who brought the lawsuit and drank few cups of coffee a day, said the industry was able to remove the chemical without compromising the taste.

"I firmly believe if the potato chip industry can do it, the coffee industry may," Metzger said. "A warning will not be so effective because it is an addictive product."

Many coffee shops have already issued warnings stating that acrylamide is a carcinogenic chemical in coffee. But signs to be placed at the point of sale are often found in places that are not easily visible, such as under the counter where cream and sugar are available.

Customers in stores that issue warnings are often unaware […] Afternoon coffee drinkers in a Los Angeles Starbucks said they would look into the warning or give coffee, which drinks a second thought after the verdict, but the Joe's cup would probably win.

"I do not do it right now I think it would stop me," said Jen Bitterman, a digital marketing technologist. "I love the taste, I love the ritual, I love the high, the energy, and I think I'm addicted to it."

Darlington Ibekwe, a lawyer in Los Angeles, said a cancer warning would be annoying I did not want to stop him from indulging in three lats a week.

"It's like cigarettes, how, damn, now I have to see that?" he said. "Dude, I enjoy my coffee."

The defendants have a few weeks to challenge the verdict before it is final and could be exonerated in an appeals court.

If the verdict stands, it could be a tough phase of fines that could sweep consumers across the state's borders.

The judge may set another phase of the lawsuit against possible civil penalties up to $ 2,500 per person suspended every day for eight years. That could be an astronomical sum in a state with nearly 40 million inhabitants, though such a massive fine is unlikely.

California's oversized market could make it difficult to tailor warp packaging specifically to state-owned stores.

This means that even coffee drinkers with a cancer warning could drink their coffee. Cream and sugar would still be optional.

___

Associated Press writer Amanda Lee Myers of Los Angeles and AP chief medical writer Marilynn Marchione of Milwaukee contributed to this story.


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *