BIPA "does not contain any definition of what it means to be injured," the court said, and under "generally understandable" conditions, you have experienced this damage solely by violating the law. The court added that the whole point of the law is to give users better control over when and how companies collect biometric information. If companies can evade liability, as long as they do not cause material damage, your right to control your privacy "disappears" into the air.
The State Chamber of Commerce challenged the decision, claiming it would "open the floodgates" "to lawsuits that would harm the economy of Illinois.
That's not necessarily the case, but there's no doubt that The decision will have a significant impact, with Google, Facebook and others being confronted with lawsuits that accused them of violating BIPA by tagging faces in photos without asking the user, and Google recently became a case of photos The plaintiffs were accused of failing to prove that they were "exposed to specific injuries." However, that argument could not be upheld after the Six Flags ruling.