قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / The judge facilitates the requirements under the "exact match" of Georgia

The judge facilitates the requirements under the "exact match" of Georgia



A federal judge issued a ruling on Friday that removed the hurdles of electorate voters graded by Georgian "exact match rules" and facilitated their choices in the next week's midterm elections. The ruling could hit some of their voters during Tuesday's midterm elections to dissuade from the elections. The Democrats were particularly worried that the rule could violate the absence and early voters of their party.

They opt for a Democratic victory and a defeat for Georgia Secretary of State Georgia Brian Kemp, who is also the Republican governor

"Another day, another major defeat for Brian Kemp's repressive efforts by voters," said Rebecca DeHart, executive director of the Democratic Party of Georgia, in a statement.

Electoral voting is a key issue in Kemp's fight against Democrat Stacy Abrams, who would be the governing body of the nation's first African-American woman to win, and the pair are caught in a close race.

Kemp's office largely rejected the decision.

In a statement, Candice L. Broce, press secretary and staff secretary in the office, called it "a minor change to the current system".

Eleanor L. Ross, US District Judge from the northern district of Georgia, ruled that if the exact match rules were met, this could result in individuals having suspended application forms for voter registration "irreparable harm if they lose the right to vote."

Ross is a former President Obama, who took the position in 2013.

The law "Exact Match" marks the registration of a Applicant as "pending" if the personal information on the Voter Registration Form does not exactly match the information provided in the Department of Driver Services of the State or the Social Security Administration.

If the claimant is identified as pending, he has 26 months to give details.

The decision of Friday allows people who have marked their applications "to have a pending status due to their citizenship" to vote on Nov. 6 if they join a district registry office or a voting manager Proof of citizenship, including a state driver's license, even if expired, a state electoral card or a US passport.

Prior to Friday's ruling, no registrar was required to review information in pending applications filed for "exact match" outside of citizenship.

If on-the-spot proof can not be provided, voters can submit provisional ballot papers and forward the required information to a registrar before the Friday following the election.

In a separate ruling this week, another Georgia judge found that application documents violating this rule could not be withdrawn.

Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers Civil Rights Credentials Committee, one of the groups involved in the lawsuit, praised the decision, but emphasized that work was still needed on fair-election work.

"This is just the tip of the iceberg for the kind of obstacles that are set to voters – disproportionate minority voters," she said.

Broce said this in the decision earlier this week In the absence of votes, the judge had recognized that changing the last-minute election procedure would be a "terrible idea".

She said Ross admitted "in Friday's ruling" that Georgia already had a procedure to control citizenship in the polls.

She blamed Ros's decision to involve Poll Manager as a minor change to the verification process.

This story was last updated at 18:42 [19659033] (f unction (d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName (s) [0];
if (d.getElementById (id)) return;
js = d.createElement (s); js.id = id;
js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&appId=566538590082898&version=v2.9";
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore (js, fjs);
} (Document, & # 39; script & # 39 ;, & # 39; facebook-jssdk & # 39;));
Source link