A federal judge issued a ruling on Friday preventing the Trump administration from using billions of dollars in military money to build a wall on the southern border of the United States.
United States of America. District Judge Haywood Gilliam issued an injunction to a federal court in California, following a decision last month to temporarily suspend the use of military funds for the border wall.
President Trump Donald John TrumpSenate rejects the attempt to stem Trump's Iranian war powers Sarah Sanders: I will leave the White House with head held high The mayor of Atlanta endorses Biden for President MORE the start This year, it has declared a national emergency to provide the Ministry of Defense with approximately $ 6 billion in funds for the construction of boundary walls. Friday's decision prevents the government from using $ 2.5 billion in military funds for a border wall.
Gilliam, an employee appointed by Obama, also issued a ruling in a separate case that prevents the Trump administration from advancing border construction in New Mexico and California. 03 / 27.html Gilliam ruled in one of several groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Sierra Club, on litigation over the military funds and objected to the diversion of military assets within the scope of the National Emergency Ordinance.
The Trump administration had argued that the use of military funds under the National Emergency Ordinance was permissible because the need for funding was "unforeseen". And lawyers argued that if they were unable to allocate federal dollars to contractors by the end of the fiscal year, they might lose funding.
In his ruling on Friday, Gilliam wrote that the lawyers of the administration "did not submit any new evidence or argument as to why the court should deviate from its previous decision, and it will not."
"No new factual or legal arguments convince the court that his analysis in the injunction was wrong, [the groups’] probability of success on the merits have become an actual success, "it says in the decision.
The judge also noted that the groups that wanted to block the use of military funds for the Wall would suffer "irreparable damage" on the border wall, as this "would affect their ability to recreate in public lands along the border and otherwise enjoying it. "
Gilliam wrote that although he does not" minimize "the interest of the administration in border security," the balance between difficulty and public interest is in favor of the groups that face the wall oppose. Nevertheless, the judge refused to decide if the Trump administration violated the National Environmental Policy Act.
"Congress has clearly denied funds for Trump's xenophobic obsession with a wasteful, damaging wall," said Dror Ladin, an attorney for the ACLU arguing for the injunction in court, a statement said Friday: "This decision confirms the principle that the President has no authority to spend taxpayers 'money without Congress' approval. "
And Gloria Smith, the executive lawyer for the Sierra Club, said in a statement that the groups "welcome the court's decision to protect our Constitution, communities, and the environment today."
"We've seen the damage The ever-growing boundary wall has inflicted on communities and the environment for decades. Walls divide neighborhoods, worsen dangerous floods, destroy land and wildlife, and waste resources that should instead be used for the infrastructure that these communities really need.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra Xavier BecerraCalifornia Now Requires Background Checks for All Arms Munitions Purchases Hillicon Valley: House Panel Drives Electoral Security Law | GOP Senator targets YouTube with bill on exploitation of children | Hicks said that Congress Trump's camp after the release of Clinton docs & # 39; relief & # 39; Commerce is blacklisting five Chinese technology groups Four more countries join the general lawsuit against lawyers to block the T-Mobile Sprint's funding for its pet project. "
" All that President Trump has achieved is a constitutional crisis that threatens immediate damage to our state, "Becerra said in a statement." President Trump said he did not have to and that he would be unsuccessful in court. Today we have proven that this statement is true. "
Trump declared the national emergency to raise funds for the construction of the border wall after the government had been partially shut down within 35 days in a bill on state spending, a struggle that led to a weeks-long stalemate.
Updated at 22:51