قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / The prosecution wants to use an excerpt from "The Godfather: Part II" in Roger Stone's criminal case

The prosecution wants to use an excerpt from "The Godfather: Part II" in Roger Stone's criminal case



On a Friday afternoon, the prosecutor asked a judge for permission to show a four-minute clip from the 1974 classic mob movie. Stone, a longtime friend and supporter of President Donald Trump, referred to a figure as he tried to convince an employee to block a house committee that examined the Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

"Stone allegedly sent SMS to the presenter of the radio program, Randy Credico, as he was discussing Credico's potential testimony before the House Intelligence Committee, where the prosecution said that Stone had written a cover story in the Credico hiding the achievement of WikiLeaks in 2016 and urging Credico to follow his example under oath.

Former Special Adviser Robert Mueller accused Stone of the Russia probe earlier this year, with the trial scheduled to begin on November 5, almost exactly three years The prosecutor said on Friday that she also wanted to use a series of videos of Stone in court, during which he bragged during the 201

6 presidential campaign that he is in contact with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

.

In the videos, Stone makes allegations like, "I actually did with Assange

But while they want to bring in the Assange videos, prosecutors are trying to suppress evidence and arguments about Russian hacks against democratic goals and allegations that would have co-ordinated Russians with the Trump campaign.

Stone's lawyers said the Department of Justice must prove in court that Russia hacked the Democrats and transferred those files to WikiLeaks to prove that Stone had committed a crime. The prosecutors disagree and are trying to prevent this argument from being brought to justice.

"Stone is not accused of participating in Russia's hacking activities or having otherwise conspired with the Russian government," the prosecutor wrote.

"Evidence and arguments on these issues should be excluded from the trial, as they are irrelevant to the charges in question and pose a serious risk of jury confusion, prejudice and delay." Argument will only serve as a distraction. It just needs to be shown that the House Intelligence Committee – whom Stone allegedly lied to – was investigating possible Russian involvement in the hacks and possible ties to the Trump campaign.

But Stone's team demanded that they should be allowed to introduce evidence that WikiLeaks did not receive any stolen documents from Russia.

The House Intelligence Committee's investigation "was based on the assumption that the Russian state forwarded the stolen data to WikiLeaks, which in turn became the basis for the charges against the defendant," Stone's attorney's team wrote in a file. "To ignore this underlying foundation, this is a completely different case."

Stone's team argued that since his indictment contains the link with Russia's involvement in DNC hacking, he should have the opportunity to challenge it.

"The government can not use their Russian allegations as a sword and shield at the same time," Stone's team wrote.

Stone is accused of lying to Congress and manipulating witnesses. He was not accused of participating in the Russian hacks against Democrats or conspiring with the Kremlin.

Mueller brought the indictment earlier this year before completing the investigation and closure of his office.


Source link