قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / The Senate is planning to use a "suitcase nuclear weapon" to break through the nominations of the Trump administration

The Senate is planning to use a "suitcase nuclear weapon" to break through the nominations of the Trump administration



The Senate GOP plans to detonate a suitcase nuke in Washington next week.

The Senate Republicans and the Trump administration were angry, which they called unnecessary delays to confirm many of them nominees of the President for Justice and Executive. In 2013 and 2017, the Senate Democrats – and then the Republicans – used the "nuclear option" to lower the electoral threshold needed to end a filibuster of all nominees. Still in the way: A provision that allows senators to require the Senate to burn up to 30 hours of real time before voting to validate various candidates.

The Republicans said they are upset that Democrats are draining this time, which delays other deals.

What GOP senators have discussed would not be a full-fledged "thermonuclear strike" in the Senate. This is more of a "suitcase nuke". The Republicans would try to slow the time at stake after the Senate dropped a filibuster on subordinate candidates. The Republicans would hold a 30-hour debate for cabinet officials along with the Supreme Court and appellate nominees. However, the GOP plan would reduce the discussion time for subordinate leadership and district court nominees from 30 hours to only two.

If the Republicans in the Senate in 201

3 follow the script "Nuclear Option 1" and "Nuclear Option 2". In 2017, Republicans must put the Senate in a unique parliamentary position to set a new precedent – no change in the rules.

United States Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky to End the Debate – On a Plan to Limit Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo. This process vote to end the debate takes 60 years, but is likely to fail.

It takes 67 votes to end a filibuster on a Senate change, but only a simple majority to create a new precedent. The Senate spends much of its business on precedents, not so much on its existing rules.

McConnell may then call for a recast of a failed procedural vote, which will put the Senate in a unique parliamentary position. After a failed vote, no debate is available to end the debate. The Senate is effectively in a parliamentary dead end. After nuclear options 1 and 2, McConnell would likely ask the chairman whether the Senate needs 60 votes to end the debate on this type of resolution, with the chair advocating that this is indeed the Senate.

But next, McConnell would ask senators vote to override the verdict. The Senate would then vote on: "Should the decision of the chairman stand as a judgment of the Senate?"

GRAHAM DERIDES 'OLIVERSTEIN APPROACH & # 39; THE MUELLER REPORT

That would initiate another roll-call vote, with the Senate needing only 51 votes to pass the presidency – setting a new precedent. The Republicans would vote No against the chairman – the no votes would prevail.

After all this, the new precedent would be that the Senate would only have two hours of debate after the Senate voted for the interruption debate on lower-level nominations, but would end up having 30 years of debate on higher-level picks debate.

In short, this is the option for nuclear weapons or "suitcase nuke" in this case.

McConnell has set up on the ground, which is likely to be the failed procedural vote next week. This failed vote would be essential to carry out this maneuver.

The Democrats, however, have signaled that they are not on board. "This is just another step in [McConnell’s] limiting the rights of the minority and relinquishing authority to the government [Trump]," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., responded.

slightly more interested in the last week so far, "Blunt said about talks with Democrats. "We try to appeal to their better angels."

Blunt says the Democrats' habit of slowing things down, "goes back to Miguel Estrada," who withdrew his name from the consideration of the DC appeals court in the early 2000s, a longtime Filibuster of the Democrats.

Blunt said, "It's not a problem with the nominees. It's just a stand-up tactic that keeps us from doing other things. "

CLICK HERE TO OBTAIN THE FOX NEWS APP

." That's totally untenable, "said McConnell.

The Majority Leader noted that if a Democrat won the White House in 2020, Senate Republicans would continue to slow the nominees in return for what is happening now.


Source link