قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / World / The Senate responded to a clash around Saudi Arabia

The Senate responded to a clash around Saudi Arabia

The Senate seeks a brawl over Saudi Arabia's reaction to the assassination of Washington Post's journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Senators took a major step this week to end the US support for Saudi Arabia's military campaign in Yemen, which represents a sharp demolition of President Trump Donald John TrumpTrump and Xi agrees 90-day tariff break citing advances in trade disputes Trump increases air strikes as Taliban peace talks remain elusive Trump's New NAFTA Congress MORE faces a tough battle raided by Riad and Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman even in the light of reports that the prince personally ordered Khahoggi's death.

But now legislators need to find out what a final it is The law looks like they are preparing for a next step to bring the resolution up for debate ̵

1; and a potentially harsh ground drama. The war powers are fighting for a Senate that has repeatedly denied attempts to challenge the White House combat authority as unexplored waters.

"This is new territory, I mean, this has not happened in the past, and I want to do everything I can to ensure this is done in a dignified manner," said Sen. Bob Corker Robert (Bob) Phillips CorkerCorker: The Saudi Crown Prince is "out of control". Overnight Defense: Senate Punishes Trump with Yemen Voice | Mattis, Pompeo Briefing Can not Stop the Senate's Concerns with Saudis Graham Requests a Briefing from the CIA on Khashoggi | Pentagon identifies three troops killed in Afghanistan Senate blames Yemen's resolution on Trump MORE (19659004) (R-Tenn.), Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.

First, the senators must approve the resolution – sponsored by Sens. Chris Murphy Christopher (Chris) Scott Murphy Overnight Defense: Trump at G-20 | Describes Ukraine as "the only reason" for the cancellation of the Putin meeting | Senate passes resolution condemning Russian actions | Chairmen of the armed forces warn of defense cuts Putin greets Saudi crown prince with high-five at the G-20 summit Senate passes resolution condemning the Russian aggression against Ukraine MORE (D-Conn.), Bernie Sanders [19659011] Bernard (Bernie) SandersTrump's new NAFTA faces a tough fight in Congress Ocasio-Cortez: "frustrating" that the legislature is resisting Medicare-for-All while enjoying favorable state insurance. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren sends condolence to Bush's family MORE (I-Vt.) And Mike Lee Michael (Mike) Shumway LeeFlake again asks next week for a vote on the Mueller Protection Act. Senators discuss changes to the criminal justice law in the midst of the GOP opposition. Trump's court is taken hostage by Müller. MORE (R -Utah) – this requires Trump to remove or "touch" troops from Yemen within 30 days.

The followers, however, are confident that they can easily overcome this procedural hurdle, which only requires a simple Maj, after securing 63 votes.

After that, there is a heartburn among the supporters of the resolution and the leadership, who hope for an agreement that would prevent a cumbersome debate that might otherwise call into question the bill.

"I think that will blow up the minute, where you are too far away, "Murphy said, describing herself as open to" limited "and thematic changes.

Without an agreement on how to move forward, senators are predicting a marathon ground session that resembles the infamous "vote-a-ramas" that accompany the budgetary decisions, with each senator voting on each amendment can force each topic. This would allow any senator to raise political blinks and force hard voices that would otherwise be kept from speaking.

"Without consent, there is an unlimited voting right where we could be voting on anything from immigration reform to criminal justice reform," Sen said. John Cornyn John CornynFlake: Mueller's law has votes to pass , Senate Schumer calls for improvements to the new NAFTA agreement Flake, asking again for a vote on Muller's protection bill next week, MORE (Texas), the # 2 Republican of the Senate, and adding the "free votes" could be pretty "pretty be confusing ".

The Senators are trying to make their own proposals without there being any clear indication that, in any case, the plans have been able to conflict the votes needed to pass. Thirty-seven Republicans voted against the underlying resolution, although some might support competing proposals that would effectively replace existing law.

Corker, who is retiring after this Congress, is working on drafting a narrow amendment that would do so "teeth," but let Congress "express itself more fully."

"We are in the process of … developing an approach that we believe could better handle Saudi Arabia," he said, but largely declined to comment further on what was in his proposal becomes.

Several Republican senators voted to submit the solution last week because of the message they sent to the administration instead of their actual content. Instead, they are expected to try to replace their own bills.

Sen. Lindsey Graham Lindsey Olin GrahamFlake: Mueller Bill Has Voted in Senate Senators Discuss Changes in Criminal Justice in the GOP Opposition GOP Senator: "No Evidence in One Way or Another" Crown Prince was involved in Khashoggi's death , 19659004] (RS.C.) voted in favor of the discharge of the resolution of the Committee on Foreign Relations because he is "angry" about how the government killed Khashoggi's assassination in a Saudi consulate in Turkey and the absence of CIA director Gina Haspel in Briefing, a decision that was described by several White House senators as a misstep last week, has handled briefing.

"I have a replacement, which in my opinion is the better way. I talk to my colleagues about how we can send a message better, "Graham said.

Graham's alternative, which he presented as a stand-alone bill with Sen. Robert Menendez Robert (Bob) MenendezPro- Israeli organizations should finally be allowed to train against Iran Dems Trump lowers the refugee target to 30,000, he must owe it to Senate, not FBI, for Kavanaugh's travesty MORE (DN.J.), would require sanctions inside 30 days after that Khashoggi's death, including "any government official from Saudi Arabia or a member of the royal family" who was determined to be involved.

In addition, a report on the human rights record of the kingdom would be required within 30 days In order to counter the Yemen crisis, the law would suspend the sale of arms to Saudi Arabia and prohibit the US military from acquiring Saudi coalition aircraft

Graham responded to a photo of the Saudi Crown Prince and Russian President Vladimir Putin warmly welcomed At the summit meeting of the Group of 20 Friday, it was announced that in a tweet on Friday "the total vote in the Senate will increase, to pass the sanctions laws against the MBS. "

The opening speech of the Democrats should be based on the resolution as it is currently drafted. Murphy said it was "much more likely" that the Democrats would try to get the approval to vote on the resolution, and warned against watering down the resolution until it was little more than a symbolic shot at the Saudi crown prince was.

"There are all amendments that would be too weak to support, and I imagine supporting the other cosponsors. But, listen, I understand we have no legislative practice, so it all sounds absolutely fantastic. You may have to make difficult decisions about which changes to support without affecting the underlying bill, "he added.

Key members and leadership are seeking to conclude a deal that would curtail the ground drama, or at least require changes to Saudi Arabia as they seek to avoid a partisan train wreck. Two Senate advisors said they had not reached an agreement on Friday, and one predicted that agreement could be reached on Monday.

Cornyn said he hoped that once members understood what an open process of change would mean, they hoped they would vote in favor of a package and avoid the free for all.

Corker warned that without an agreement to limit the Senate debate, "all sorts of amendments" could be put to the vote.

"The question is whether we can limit [it] to things relative to Saudi Arabia and foreign policy," he said.

And there is still time, senators argue, for the government to endorse Senate support may be thwarted by squeezing Saudi Arabia to other issues than truce in Yemen before the Senate makes the next vote on its legislation.

Although the frustration with Saudi Arabia – both because of Khashoggi's death as a also because of the years of war in Yemen – on which Capitol Hill has reached a fever, the Government of the Government is a fever and Trump's have signaled to them that they are standing next to the ally.

"If we abandon Saudi Arabia That would be a terrible mistake, "Trump told reporters this month, adding," We may never know who was ultimately responsible for the murder. "Khashoggi. [19659002] The White House threatens to veto the Senate resolution and sends the Secretary of Defense James Mattis James Norman MattisTrump increases the airstrikes, while the Taliban's peace talks remain elusive as military action against Iran threatens MORE and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo Michael (Mike) Richard PompeoPompeo rips off Iranian missile test: Increased "escalation risk" Russia is trying to "starve" the port cities Ukraine, says former ambassador The Hill & # 39; s Morning Report – Markets trumps Trump, Xi negotiates with MORE to educate senators in an unsuccessful attempt to destroy him.

Murphy said The emerging Senate vote could be a "leveraged moment" for the government with Saudi Arabia and let them avoid "messy" ground combat in Congress.

"I think there are some Republicans who think the government would pull a rabbit out of hand to file an application to continue," Murphy said. "So let's see if the administration has anything to report. If this is not the case, the application is successful and we must agree. "

Source link