قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / The splitting of the Democratic health system pushes the aspirants to the Senate

The splitting of the Democratic health system pushes the aspirants to the Senate

  Bernie Sanders Elizabeth Warren "/> </source></source></source></source></picture>
                  Democrats must receive at least three seats to regain the Senate health service by 2020, but the general public remains suspicious of Medicare for All." Alex Wong / Getty Images </p>
<p>  The great democrats on the battlefield have nothing to do with Medicare for All. </p>
<p>  In states like Arizona, Iowa and North Carolina, challengers Mark Kelly, Theresa Greenfield and Cal Cunningham continue to focus on the House of Representatives Message from 2018: Extension of Medicaid, Protection of Obamacare and Repeal of Republican Repeal Efforts Incumbents such as Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (DNH), Doug Jones (D-Ala.) And Gary Peters (D-Mich.) Similarly agree and support proposals such as public health insurance, but reject the adoption of a single national insurance from the plan. </p><div><script async src=

Story Continued B elow

It is a remarkable split between the Democrats forging general electoral plans in key battlefield countries and presidential hopes, such as Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, for a national democratic preselection. And it could make for a delicate general election if either Warren or Sanders becomes the Democratic presidential candidate for Medicare for All, while the party's most likely candidates run on more moderate health platforms.

In an interview, asked if Medicare for All advocates could win his state, which is a critical battleground. Peters said they needed to "show and explain exactly how that would help people here in Michigan."

"I think people want to have the opportunity to take out private insurance," he added, noting that he A public option and a bill that reduces the age requirements for Medicare will support inbox.

Republican strategists are working tirelessly to bind endangered Democratic incumbents to Medicare for All, whether or not they support the proposal. Activist groups fighting for payer health care, however, argue that inclusive policies will stimulate the democratic base and that candidates who are too cautious and calculating will not give voters a reason to prove themselves in 2020.

"These strategies sell themselves as safe and incrementally they do not move people," said Kelly Coogan-Gehr, Deputy Director of Public and Local Advocacy at National Nurses United, the highest union fighting for Medicare for All. "The base is not moved by security. We talk to hundreds of people every day and they are not moved by the extension of the ACA or a public option. They want something much more comprehensive and they are ready to fight for it.

Democrats must receive at least three seats to win back the Senate in 2020. Recent surveys show that the party has a strong advantage in terms of health However, the general public remains concerned about Medicare for All and support for the elimination of private insurance is low.

Democratic strategists believe it makes sense for presidential candidates to criticize Medicare for All as they largely have some ideals for their health care and want to demonstrate brave ideas to eager democratic voters. However, some fear that risky promises of health care for single payers will take precedence over emphasizing Trump's deeply unpopular record.

"This election is a referendum on the incumbent president," said Brad Woodhouse, a seasoned Democratic Advisor and Executive Director of the pro-Obamacare advocacy group Protect Our Care. "It's a missed opportunity to see the consequences of Trump's second term in office failing to pinpoint American healthcare: another attempt to lift, massive cuts in Medicare and Medicaid, constant efforts to downsize Medicaid roles and exclude people from coverage. " This is at least as important as setting up your reporting plan. "

Woodhouse, former spokesman for the Democratic Senator campaign committee, said Democrats would need to maintain the sweep of Republicans' attempts to repeal Obamacare in 2017. The current federal lawsuit completely repeals the law on affordable care and tens of millions of people could get rid of their insurance. The Trump Justice Department has backed the lawsuit, which could go to the Supreme Court next year.

"[Sens.] Joni Ernst, Thom Tillis, Mitch McConnell, and Cory Gardner – they have not turned to the voters since they tried to lift health care," Woodhouse said. "And none of the most vulnerable republicans standing for re-election has separated from the lawsuit in Texas."

The lawsuit has become a focal point for campaigns in the Democratic Senate, with candidates also promoting their own work to defend and expand Obamacare.

In Arizona, Democrats moved to the Senate last year, focusing primarily on health care and beating Republican Martha McSally for their vote in the House of Representatives to lift Obamacare. McSally, who has been called to the Senate and re-enrolls in a special election next year, faces Kelly, who recently clarified in an interview with the Republic of Arizona that he does not support Medicare All.

"I think it leads us in the wrong direction, in the opposite direction we need to go to," Kelly said, pointing out those who would lose their private insurance under the plan and said he preferred a public option. "This health insurance is not always perfect, but there are many people who like the plan they have. I do not think we should take that from them.

Other high-ranking Democratic recruits have similar positions. In Iowa, DSCC-backed Greenfield supports a public option and supports Obamacare, according to a pollster. In North Carolina, following the launch of its June campaign, Cunningham told local media that he was open to a public option, but he did not support the abolition of private insurance. In Georgia, Teresa Tomlinson, the race's first female Democrat, stands for a public option.

And in Colorado, which looks set to become a Senate seat after the Democrats' Best Opportunity in 2020, newly-crowned Democratic leader John Hickenlooper spent his brief presidential campaign as a decided Medicare for All campaign. Most other candidates also support some kind of public health care. But Andrew Romanoff, the only top candidate in the Medicare for All race, told POLITICO that some Democrats are afraid of republican arguments against lone payers.

"It will not happen if we do not fight for it and many Democrats surrender without the fight," said Romanoff.

Democrats are similarly divided in Texas. Former Representative Chris Bell and activist Cristina Tzintzun Ramirez favor Medicare for All. In a statement, Ramirez called it the "gold standard to ensure that every American has comprehensive health care." However, two others, Amanda Edwards and MJ Hegar, are in favor of a public option.

"I did not necessarily go in that direction from Medicare for All because we basically do not want reporting, certainly not," Edwards said in an interview after starting her campaign in July. "I think there are different ways to try to achieve the desired goals of increased access to coverage and optionality."

While Shaheen backed an earlier version of Sanders' bill, she did not sign legislation in 2019 and has been pursuing a more moderate health care agenda of maintaining and expanding the current system.

"The best you can do is build on the affordable care law and look at the parts that do not work," Shaheen said. "I think that's the fastest way to expand coverage while lowering costs." including cost reduction and public option proposals.

Stewart Boss, a spokesman for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said Democrats were "focused on proposals that expand coverage, improve access to health care and cut costs," while republican incumbents "held accountable for their harmful votes repeal of the Affordable Care Act.

Republicans have used the depositor as a key issue The National Republican Senatorial Committee has paid for posters that highlight the problem on the battlefields of the Senate, and One Nation, a nonprofit organization that is supporting the GOP Leadership affiliated has switched to television advertising that is attacking politics.

"For Democrats, all roads lead to Medicare for All and eliminating employer-related coverage," said Jesse Hunt, a spokesman for the NRSC, "The Senate Democrats will not to be in the position of the promised socialist agencies escaping. "The presidential candidates of their party, no matter how hard they try to disguise their true purpose. "

Stakeholders advocating Medicare for All agree that a single payer who wins the nomination will put tremendous pressure on Senate candidates running in Swing States – but you see this as more of an advantage as a commitment.

"You will see that they are forced to respond to Medicare for All," says Coogan-Gehr. "People will hold their feet by the fire like never before."

Source link