قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / The Supreme Court appeals to the Trump government's plan to ask for citizenship in the census

The Supreme Court appeals to the Trump government's plan to ask for citizenship in the census



The Supreme Court added a politically explosive case to its nondescript file on Friday, and agreed to decide by the end of June whether the Trump administration would ask the Citizens Census Form 2020, which is sent to every US household, a citizenship issue can add. [19659002] The census has stopped questioning every household since 1950, and last month a federal judge prevented the Department of Commerce from adding it to the upcoming count. He questioned the motives of Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and said that the secretary had broken a "regular ban" on federal rules by overriding the advice of civil servants.

Those who oppose the issue argue that the census response rate is likely to fall if households are asked if undocumented immigrants are present, and the Constitution's requirement for a "true enumeration" of the population after a decade exactly.

Since the administration has stated by the end of June that the census form may contain the question, the court has bypassed its usual procedures to accept the case. The case is said to be filed in late April.

The judges will directly test the 227-page opinion of US District Judge Jesse M. Furman of New York and will not need to go to court in US appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

The Trump government, as well as the 18 states, municipalities and others who questioned Ros's decision, told the court that the decision was so important that it justifies exceptional treatment.

Chief challenger, said in his brief statement before the court:

"The enumeration concerns the allocation of representatives of Congress among States, the allocation of voters in the electoral college, the allocation of congressional districts within each state, the division of the state and local legislative seats as well as the distribution of hundreds of billions of dollars in federal funds.

Attorney General Noel J. Francisco informed the court that Furman had exceeded his authority. [19659011] The district court made the "unprecedented step of solving a demographic issue from the 10-year census and preventing the Trade Minister from exercising his delegated powers" to decide how the census will be conducted, Francisco & # 39; s letter to the court.

According to the government, this is the first time that the judiciary has dictated the content of the ten-year census questionnaire. "

But Furman and the states questioning Ros's decision said that Congress has imposed restrictions on the type of information the secretary can pursue and the process for implementing the proposal.

Ross has not considered several important aspects of the problem; alternately ignored, picked with cherries or misinterpreted the evidence in the file before him; both irrational in the face of this evidence and its own stated decision-making criteria; and did not substantiate significant deviations from previous policies and practices, "Furman wrote.

Ross announced the decision to add the issue in March 2018. He said at the time that he responded to a request from the Justice Department Enforcement of Minority Rights Protection Acts Required.

Later e-mails and denials in the lawsuit showed that Ross had discussed the issue with White House officials calling for action against undocumented immigrants. that he had contacted Justice Department officials, not the other way around.

The New York Report says Ross acted directly against the advice of experts from the Census Bureau of Career.

"For at least 40 years, the Bureau has decided on the other hand, to add such a question, which is based on its concern that This inevitably jeopardizes the overall accuracy of the population census by suppressing the response rates of specific populations, including non-citizens and immigrants. "New York Attorney General Letitia James. [19659019] window.addEventListener ("DOMContentLoaded", function () {});
window.addEventListener ("load", function () {var isEUUser = wp_pb.StaticMethods.isEUUser () || false; var isAdfreeUser = wp_pb.StaticMethods.isAdfree () || false; function applyTwitter () {try {var $ tweetAuthors ) = $ ("tweet authors"); var $ tweetTimelines = $ (". twitter-timeline"); if ((!! !! tweetAuthors.length || !! $ tweetTimelines.length) && (! window.twttr | |! twttr.widgets)) $. ajax ({dataType: "script", cache: true, url: "// platform.twitter.com/widgets.js",success:function(data){if(!!$ tweetAuthors.length) $ tweetAuthors.find ( ".pb-twitter-follow.unprocessed"). removeClass ("unprocessed")}}}} catch (e) {}} if (wp_pb.StaticMethods.isPageHydrated ()) applyTwitter ());
__e = window .__ e || []; __e.push ([“shamble:end”,function(){applyTwitter()}]); wp_import (pbThirdPartyScripts) .always (function () {document.dispatchEvent (new CustomEvent ("pb-r-Third-Party-js") if (! isEUUser &&! isAdfreeUser) try {$ ("body"). catch (e) {} if (! isEUUser) {! function (f, b, e, v, n, t, s) {if (f.fbq) return; n = f.fbq = function () {n. callMethod? n.callMethod.apply (n, arguments): n.queue.push (arguments)} if (! f._fbq) f._fbq =
n; n.push = n; n.loaded =! 0; n.version = "2.0"; n.queue = []; t = b.createElement (e); t.async =! 0; t.src = v; s = b.getElementsByTagName (s) [0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore (t, s)} (window, document, "script", "https://connect.facebook.net/en/fbevents). js"); fbq ("init", "1063176057035408"); fbq ("track", "pageview"); if (wp_meta_data.clavis && wp_meta_data.clavis.auxiliaries && wp_meta_data.clavis.auxiliary.luracha) ", {content_ids: wp_meta_data.clavis.auxiliaries}}}});
Source link