قالب وردپرس درنا توس
Home / US / The Supreme Court shields Trade Secretary Wilbur Ross from answering questions in census controversies

The Supreme Court shields Trade Secretary Wilbur Ross from answering questions in census controversies



The Supreme Court warned Trade Minister Wilbur Ross to answer attorneys' questions in a lawsuit in which his decision to add a citizenship question to the Census Form for 2020 was contestable

Supreme Court to block the interrogation of Ross as part of a lawsuit filed by several states, including New York, and civil rights groups. The groups are trying to prevent the administration from adding a citizenship question to the ten-year census. It is one of six legal challenges to the question that, according to Ross, should be added to the poll on March 26 to help enforce the Voting Rights Act.

The court's suit makes it unlikely that Ross will have to testify in the case (19659005) Advocate General Noel Francisco told the court that Ross had explained his actions and that it was inappropriate for courts "to allow an intrusive fishing expedition "The statements by senior government officials, including a cabinet secretary."

The states and groups said Ross should be discontinued. He said that "he offered varying and inaccurate explanations in his decision-making and testimony before the Congress," as well as in new documents filed in the case, according to a letter from the New York Immigration Coalition, the ACLU, and others.

Democratic lawmakers and immigrant rights groups have blown up the idea of ​​adding the citizenship issue. They claim that immigrants and their families will be less likely to complete the form, resulting in a more costly and less accurate count.

Six former census directors and an internal Census Bureau analyst have also said that the question of counting would hurt

That in turn could distribute states with large immigrant populations in Congress and federal funds on the basis of the population.

Ross first said that he added the citizenship question at the behest of the Ministry of Justice, which said it was needed to help enforce suffrage.

But e-mails showed that he had previously pushed for the inclusion of the citizenship issue, and the groups and states claim that the demand of the judiciary is an excuse.

In One Document In response to questions submitted by New York Justice Minister Barbara Underwood (D), Ross admitted that he had the problem with former White House Advisor Stephen K. Bannon and a Republican had discussed Secretary of State, leader in anti-immigration efforts.

In the document, Ross said he now remembered Bannon calling him in the spring of 2017 to ask if Ross would speak with Kansas Foreign Minister Kris Kobach about ideas for a possible citizenship issue on the census

Statement to Congress to contradict this year. At a hearing on March 20 by MP Grace Meng (DN.Y.), whether the President or anyone in the White House had discussed the citizenship issue with him, Ross said, "I know nothing about it." [19659015] Ministry of Commerce spokesman Kevin Manning said in an e-mail message that Ross replied to "a question about an RNC campaign email, not a direct question about citizenship issue." Manning added that Ross "did indeed see the RNC email. The congressman hired him during the hearing when he answered the question from Rep. Meng and truthfully replied that he did not receive the RNC email

Meng has asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions to investigate Ross's crimes that relate to false allegations or representations of documents that must be submitted to Congress.

"I do not like it, lied to "In a statement, Meng said," The whole process around the city The Zenship question was badly handled and rushed.

In August, a judge at the US District Court ordered Ross and John Gore, acting deputy attorney general of the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, to convict themselves.

Earlier, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg had temporarily taken a lower court decision Ross had to undergo an interrogation, and both a district judge and two panels of the US Circuit Court have said that the statements should go further.


Source link