UNITED NATIONS – The Trump government stepped up its opposition to the UN Assembly next week on Friday to pass a landmark pact on migration. He calls it a "pro-migration" document that undermines sovereignty and warns that supporters are trying to create new international law.
The US Mission to the United Nations has issued the blistering tripartite "National Statement" on the "Global Compact on Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration", to be formally approved at a high-level meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, on 10 May. and December 11th.
The statement claims that the pact has attempted to "globalize" migration management at the expense of state sovereignty, and "its pro-migration attitudes do not recognize the well-managed. Legal immigration must begin with effective national control of borders
The design process for the Global Compact was launched after all 1
The United States, however, retreated under President Donald Trump a year ago, claiming that numerous provisions were set in the EU compact was "incompatible with US immigration and refugee policies."
In July, 192 countries unanimously agreed on the 34-page pact – the first global anti-migration document – to boycott only US states after lengthy negotiations on the often-debated issue.
But in recent months, countries like Hungary, Austria, Israel, Poland, Switzerland, Australia and Slovakia have ceased their support, saying that they will not attend the meeting in Marrakech.
Slovak Foreign Minister Miroslav Lajcak, The former President of the General Assembly, who chaired the meeting in July, resigned because of his country's opposition to the pact, but said he changed his mind on Friday after being supported by the president was not, Prime Minister and many others.
U.N. Press spokesman Stephane Dujarric said Friday that 135 countries are the U.N. have informed. They are attending the meeting in Marrakech and "we also expect more of them to register on the first day of the conference." He also announced the participation of UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres.
Louise Arbor, the UN envoy for international migration chairing Marrakech, expressed very disappointment last week that some countries reject their support for the pact. especially because it is not legally binding and after its formal adoption "there is no country that is obliged to do something it does not want".
Dujarric called it "regrettable," but stressed Friday that this "is not a closed door" and the UN hopes that the countries "will come back and participate in these discussions. "
" This is a non-binding pact, "Dujarric said." It's about helping countries cope with migration. This is about affirming the rights of the countries, obviously controlling their own borders. It seems to contradict the logic of how to handle migration without global conversation. "
But the US statement On Friday, concerns expressed" that compact supporters recognize the lack of broad support for a legally binding international migration convention , try to use the Treaty and its results and objectives as a long-term means of building customary international law or the so-called "soft" law "in the field of migration."
It is said that the word "compact" has no agreed meaning in international law, "but it does imply a legal obligation."