Home / US / The White House tells Don McGahn not to comply with the Democrat summons

The White House tells Don McGahn not to comply with the Democrat summons

McGahn's decision to disobey the summons could lead Nadler to disregard McGahn, just as he did to Attorney General William Barr after the Department of Justice issued a summons on the basis of the unadjusted Müller report lying evidence had refused. A Nadler adviser reported that CNN Justice Department officials and judicial committee staff had come to Capitol Hill on Tuesday after meeting with MP deputies to try to negotiate a friendly outcome of the committee's demands, according to the report Mueller is to appear in an untouched version that the Ministry of Justice has not yet released. The adjutant said the vote on Wednesday was whether Barr was to be scorned, at least at the end of the meeting is still planned.

Nadler issued a summons to McGahn for documents and testimony in connection with McGahn's lawyer investigating the commission of inquiry McGahn's attorney William Burck said in a letter Tuesday that McGahn had committed himself to the White House's position of taking control of the Kept documents that Nadler had specified.

Tuesday, the deadline for McGahn's conversion.

"The committee is trying to force Mr. McGahn to produce White House documents that the executive has requested that they not produce," Burck wrote. "If equal government branches make conflicting demands on Mr. McGahn regarding the same documents, the best answer for Mr. McGahn is to maintain the status quo, unless the committee and executive reach shelter."

The Legal Adviser White House Pat Cipollone wrote to Nadler on Tuesday and asked the committee to request the White House and not McGahn documents.

"Because Mr. McGahn does not have the right to make these documents available to third parties. I would like to ask the committee to send the relevant documents to the White House, the responsible legal depositary," Cipollone wrote. "The acting Chief of Staff of the President, Mick Mulvaney, has instructed Mr. McGahn not to submit these White House documents in response to the April 22 summons of the Committee."

Cipollone added that the documents in question are still protected by the executive's privileges "because they imply significant confidentiality interests of the executive."

However, the White House has not yet called for executive privileges for the material.

  Mitch McConnell argues & # 39; Case completed, & # 39; Time to progress from Müller report

. While the White House said it would not allow McGahn to hand in documents, the White House did not state its position as to whether it would look for it. According to a person familiar with the matter, McGahn's statement is also to be blocked.

The Justice Committee voted last month to approve McGahn's summons and five other former White House officials interviewed by the Special Representative's team. The Committee is interested in receiving documents from these officials referring to the preparation of their interviews with the Special Lawyer as part of the panel's separate investigation into possible disability in the judiciary.

So far, Nadler has only issued one summons to McGahn, not the other four White House officials.

Rep. Doug Collins, the supreme Republican justice committee, called on Democrats to negotiate with the White House to reach an agreement.

"As I said more than a month ago, when the Democrats summoned Don McGahn, they summoned the wrong person," the Georgian Republican said in a statement. "The White House is still trying to meet the unruly demands of the Democrats, and I hope Chairman Nadler will accept this reasonable offer rather than continuing to refuse negotiations in good faith."

McGahn was a key witness in the Special Representative's report on the obstruction of justice, including an episode in which Trump asked McGahn to fire the special lawyer, and McGahn would not.
  READ: Letter from the White House to House Democrats regarding Don McGahn's summons

If the committee goes to court to try to force McGahn to hand over records, which could lead to a review of the executive's executive law, which could have implications for the House's numerous investigations into the Trump administration.

The House Democrats have argued that McGahn and other former White House officials had renounced executive rights while talking to Mueller's team. Nadler also says that the documents he seeks are not subject to executive law because they were handed over to lawyers outside the White House.

However, the White House bureau has reaffirmed its right to assert executive executive power to conduct a Congressional investigation, arguing that refusing executive law to Mueller's criminal investigation is not the same as having its own branch of government.

This story was updated on Tuesday with further developments.

CNN's Kara Scannell contributed to this report.

Source link